BREAKING NEWS
News While It's Still Hot

Virtual Iron Beefs Up Server Virtualization with Version 4

Published: September 4, 2007

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

The run for the money is in full swing for server virtualization, and now that VMware has gone public and is now worth nearly $26 billion and XenSource is in the process of being eaten by Citrix Systems for $500 million, it is a lot easier for any vendor of virtualization products to make noise. But it is also getting more difficult to be heard over the cacophony. Virtual Iron, which has been chasing server virtualization as long as XenSource and which uses a variant of the Xen hypervisor, is one of the louder vendors in the space aside from the big two.

This week, trying to steal a little thunder ahead of the VMworld 2007 event being hosted by VMware in San Francisco, Virtual Iron is launching Version 4 of its eponymous server virtualization tool set. Virtual Iron 4, like its predecessor, includes a variant of the Xen hypervisor--Xen version 3.1 in this case--wrapped with software developed by Virtual Iron years ago that not only allows a server to be carved up into virtualized slices, but also allows multiple physical servers to be ganged up to present a single image for the hypervisor to use. This latter bit is something that neither VMware's ESX Server nor XenSource's XenEnterprise hypervisors can do, and Microsoft's future "Viridian" hypervisor for Windows Server 2008, formerly known as Longhorn Server, will not have this capability, either, when it is in customer hands maybe in May or June 2008.

As has been the case for the past year, Virtual Iron has been trying to position its software as providing the same functionality or more as VMware's ESX Server and the related Virtual Infrastructure 3 extensions at a price that is competitive with XenEnterprise virtualization tools. VMware dominates the server virtualization space because of the sophistication of its products, and customers have thus far been willing to pay a hefty premium for functionality and compatibility; ESX Server is by far the most certified hypervisor on servers, and the most widely distributed. But that doesn't mean there is room for players like Virtual Iron, XenSource, and others.

With Virtual Iron Version 4, the company is moving to the 64-bit version of the Xen 3.1 hypervisor, to which Virtual Iron, among many others, have contributed code as part of the open source Xen hypervisor project that was initially created by XenSource several years ago. Virtual Iron Version 4 supports up to 128 GB of physical memory (in one box, spread across as many as 16 boxes, or somewhere in between) and a guest virtual machine riding atop of the hypervisor can have as much as 32 GB of memory for itself. The Xen 3.1 hypervisor also supports eight-way SMP clustering inside of a VM (in this case, this means up to eight CPU sockets, regardless of how many cores are involved), and the hypervisor now knows about ACPI power management, too, enabling the hot-plugging of processors. This extended SMP support is important for Microsoft Exchange Server groupware and SQL Server database workloads. Obviously, 32-bit as well as 64-bit operating systems can be run on Virtual Iron.

Virtual Iron Version 4 also has Novell's SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 Service Pack 1 kernel and drivers integrated into it, which is how the Virtual Iron hypervisor boots itself onto a bare metal server. VMware uses a variant of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 for this purpose, while XenEnterprise uses a variant of Debian Linux. The integration of the SUSE Linux kernel and drivers for the Virtual Iron hypervisor means SUSE Linux is a lot easier to support above the hypervisor as well. (It is not clear if this confers any performance benefits compared to other Linuxes.)

On the operating system front, the updated Virtual Iron product supports Microsoft's Windows Vista and Windows 2000 operating systems, expanding beyond the already existing support for Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 has been added to the support matrix, alongside the existing RHEL 4 and CentOS 4.4; the company has not yet announced its support plans for RHEL 5, which was announced in March of this year. SLES 9 and SLES 10 are supported on Virtual Iron's implementation of the Xen hypervisor, and so is Oracle Enterprise Linux 4.

Virtual Iron already has LiveMigrate, a feature for teleporting running VMs around virtualized servers connected over a network, as well as LiveCapacity, a dynamic resource allocation feature, and LiveRecovery, a means of moving VMs when hardware is failing to maintain VM uptime. Rather than create its own physical-to-virtual and virtual-to-virtual image creation software, Virtual Iron is partnering with PlateSpin to gain P2V and V2V capability. Virtual Iron is embedding a version of PlateSpin's PowerConvert tool in a high-end variant of its own product and is renaming the feature LiveConvert to be consistent. The new release of Virtual Iron also has a graphical management console that runs on Windows machines and graphing and reporting tools to help with capacity planning for virtualized environments.

With Virtual Iron Version 3, the company offered a freebie version aimed at a single physical server and offering up to 12 VMs on a single processor with local disk storage. Virtual Iron Enterprise Edition offered unlimited numbers of VMs, virtual SMP inside a machine; local disk storage or iSCSI or Fibre Channel SAN storage; LiveMigration and LiveMaintenance patching, and standard business support for $499 per processor socket. With Virtual Iron Version 4, the company is adding a new bundle, called Extended Enterprise Edition, which adds in LiveRecovery and LiveCapacity features, the LiveConvert P2V and V2P conversion from PlateSpin with up to six P2V conversions and two V2V conversions per CPU socket, and all the other capabilities of the Enterprise Edition for $799 per socket.

According to Mike Grandinetti, chief marketing officer at Virtual Iron, the functionality in Virtual Iron Version 4 Extended Enterprise Edition is roughly akin to the Virtual Infrastructure 3 stack from VMware, which runs $2,875 per server processor socket. XenEnterprise 4, which was just announced a few weeks ago as Citrix was buying XenSource, has similar functionality, but does not have P2V and V2V transformation bundled in and the storage management features that were announced through a partnership with Symantec will not be ready until later this year, and will also drive the price of XenEnterprise 4 above the current $1,250 per socket. Many of the features that XenSource is bragging about in XenEnterprise 4 have been in Virtual Iron products for more than a year. Virtual Iron is committed to competing on features and price, and has been doing so for years. Which is why the company has hundreds of customers even though it is much smaller than VMware.

Virtual Iron Version 4 will be available on September 10.

As for the acquisition of XenSource by Citrix, Virtual Iron is not worried about this as it relates to its conversion from its own proprietary hypervisor to Xen, which the company did back in April 2006. "The Xen project will move to a more open, traditionally managed, independent project, complete with third party governance," says Grandinetti. "This is a positive step forward."

While this is certainly true, Citrix has paid $500 million for XenSource, and it will do everything in its power to make that investment pay off, which probably means Virtual Iron will feel some increasing competitive heat.


RELATED STORIES

Virtual Iron Inks Distribution Deal with Tech Data

Virtual Iron Adds iSCSI Support to Server Virtualization

VMware, XenSource Launch Virtualization Bundles

XenSource, Virtual Iron Gun for VMware with Features, Low Prices

Virtual Iron Readies Next-Generation Virtualization, Partners with PlateSpin

Novell, Virtual Iron Embed VFe-Capable Kernel into SLES 9

Virtual Iron Standardizes on Xen, Goes Open Source

Virtual Iron Broadens Support with Release 2.0



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editors: Dan Burger, Timothy Prickett Morgan, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Delroy
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
nuBridges:  Linux-based software for electronic data interchange and secure managed file transfer
Bytware:  The power of McAfee with award-winning StandGuard Anti-Virus for Linux

 

 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95


 
The Four Hundred
IBM Explains Its Domino 8 on DB2/400 Spike

Consumers Create a Feedback Loop into IT

Aldon Works on Acquisitions to Build Out Biz

Mad Dog 21/21: Leverage

The Linux Beacon
Oracle Adds Features to Linux, Validates Configurations

Novell Almost Profits on Rising Linux, Stabilizing NetWare

Ubuntu Opens Up Development for LTS 8.04, Due in April 2008

Consumers Create a Feedback Loop into IT

Four Hundred Stuff
SugarCRM Delivers 'Landmark' Release

Automating Database Encryption Expands Linoma's Portfolio

Services a Priority at ASNA after Merger with BluePhoenix

The Data Quality Inflection Point

Big Iron
PSI Adopts NEC Itanium Servers for Mainframe Clones

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
PHP: An Easy Yet Powerful Language Syntax

I Want My F15 Back!

Admin Alert: Magical & Mysterious iSeries Access CWB Programs

System i PTF Guide
August 11, 2007: Volume 9, Number 32

August 4, 2007: Volume 9, Number 31

July 28, 2007: Volume 9, Number 30

July 21, 2007: Volume 9, Number 29

July 14, 2007: Volume 9, Number 28

July 7, 2007: Volume 9, Number 27

The Windows Observer
Acer Buys Gateway, and Maybe Packard Bell, Too

AMD's Chip Roadmaps: Beyond Barcelona

Server Sales in Q2 Reach Heights Not Seen Since 2000

Microsoft Gets System Configuration Manager Out the Door

The Unix Guardian
AMD's Chip Roadmaps: Beyond Barcelona

Server Sales in Q2 Reach Heights Not Seen Since 2000

IBM Messes With System p 595 Prices, Tweaks Deals

The X Factor: Economic Recession Is the IT Innovator's Ally

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

BACK ISSUES

Breaking News

Printer Friendly Version





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement