BREAKING NEWS
News While It's Still Hot

Red Hat to Use Automation, Virtualization to Eat the Server Space

Published: November 7, 2007

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

It is not very often that you see an IT vendor that is not holding a monopoly or near monopoly in its market point to the upper decks and say that it is going to make a home run, on demand. But today, as the chief techies and marketeer at commercial Linux distributor Red Hat were announcing Enterprise Linux 5.1 and their vision to virtualize the data center, the company said that it was aiming to have its Linux own 50 percent market share on global server shipments by 2015.

Paul Cormier, executive vice president of worldwide engineering at Red Hat, didn't waste any time in proclaiming the company's lofty goal when he started the conference call with journalists and analysts. "We are predicting that Red Hat will power over 50 percent of servers by 2015," he declared. This undoubtedly sent a number of people checking to see if their phone lines or Web links were bad, or if maybe they had too much wax in their ears. But as soon as the presentations were over, everyone flooded the lines with the same question: You're gonna what? "We will more than double our market share by 2015," confirmed Scott Crenshaw, vice president of the company's Enterprise Linux business unit, adding that meant Red Hat would be on more than half of the servers shipped.

That is a hard ball to hit as high and as far as Red Hat seems to think it can hit it, but being an upstart Linux pioneer from the dot-com days, this is exactly the kind of behavior you expect. You just don't expect such statements publicly, and with such precision. That can, of course, be dangerous--particularly for a public company as Red Hat is, even if it does have tens of thousands of customers and operating systems already installed on millions of servers.

Cormier and Crenshaw believe that Red Hat's dominant position in commercial Linux in the data center, its huge market share in middleware thanks to the JBoss acquisition, and the automation it has build into its Red Hat Network and related service offerings will, when combined with a slightly more sophisticated but unified variant of its Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 platform and its subsequent kickers, give it enough of an edge over Microsoft's Windows platform, the current reigning shipment champion and the revenue leader for the past few years in the server space, and Unix, which still rakes in the money for IBM, Sun Microsystems, and Hewlett-Packard, to take more than half of global server shipments in a mere 12 years. Doing so means continuing to gnaw away at proprietary and Unix platforms while gaining Linux footprints on RISC and mainframe machines while at the same time getting a much bigger piece of the X64 (and presumably, X128 or X256) server market, too.

The secret ingredients that Red Hat plans to use to gain dominant share of the server market are integrated virtualization and support for other virtualization platforms; lots of automation for physical, virtual, and so-called "cloud computing" utility-style compute farms; a broad base of applications certified for the platform (3,400 to date, with hundreds added each week); and the distribution of software from independent software vendors through virtualized appliances. The latter idea, which involves packaging a set of applications inside a virtual machine and selling it that way as a means of simplifying installation on disparate hardware, is one that has been pushed by VMware for two years with a certain amount of success. rPath, which was founded by a bunch of ex-Red Hatters, is also creating custom Linux appliances using an application repository.

The foundation of Red Hat's strategy is, of course, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which was revved to a 5.1 release today. The company was a little vague on the improvements that are being rolled into the new release, but the key improvements seem to have to do with the integrated Xen hypervisor inside RHEL 5.1. The company said that in many cases, performance tweaks to Xen allow virtualized software stacks to run at near-metal performance; the Xen hypervisor that uses RHEL 5.1 as a domain controller for virtualized operating systems also adds Windows XP, Windows 2000 Server, Windows Server 2003, and the beta of "Longhorn" Windows Server 2008 to the list of supported guest operating systems. Red Hat has also worked with Intel and Advanced Micro Devices to tune RHEL to take better advantage of multicore processors and electronics for enhancing the performance of virtualization, such as nested page tables.

In addition to traditional desktop and server variants of RHEL, Red Hat said today it is working on two other means to provide Linux capacity to customers. The first is the ability to run Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 on Amazon's Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2) utility computing farm. Any of the 3,400 certified RHEL applications can be deployed on the EC2 utility, which is run by the bookseller's Web Services division. Red Hat said that RHEL 5.1 is the first commercial operating system to be supported on the EC2 service, which has a companion Amazon storage utility called Simple Storage Service (for storing files, and nicknamed S3). This claim is a bit of a stretch, since rPath announced its own Linux and the repository that can deploy appliance instances, was supported on the EC2 utility back in April. Red Hat plans to charge $19 per month for an EC2 instance, plus 21 cents to 94 cents per compute-hour of utility resource that customers use; the scale depends on the performance of the compute instance and includes bandwidth and storage fees. Red Hat Network will be used to provision instances on the EC2 farm. Sun does not support Linux on its eponymous grid utility--it maintains that it merely needs to support Solaris--but if it starts to, you can bet that Red Hat will be available here, too. The EC2 support for RHEL 5.1 is in private beta now, with a public beta expected before the year is out. The company did not say when EC2 support for RHEL 5.1 would be available for purchase.

The other way that Red Hat plans to drive the penetration of its Linux in the data center is through the creation of an appliance variant of RHEL 5.1 that ISVs will use to package up pre-configured and pre-installed instances of operating systems, middleware, and application software. The special variant of RHEL 5.1 made for appliances is called Red Hat Appliance Operating System, or AOS for short, and Brian Stevens, Red Hat's chief technology officer, said in the call that it is an instance of Linux optimized for virtual environments that will get a software development kit that helps ISVs figure out how to package their applications inside a virtual machine. Red Hat AOS will deploy inside the popular hypervisors, including the Xen hypervisor inside of Red Hat itself as well as VMware's ESX Server, and Microsoft's future "Viridian" hypervisor. The hypervisors used on IBM's mainframes and Power machines was not mentioned, nor was the Xen Server hypervisor from Citrix Systems (which just bought XenSource, the creator of Xen, a few weeks ago) or the Xen hypervisor inside Novell's SUSE Linux Enterprise Sever 10 operating system. Applications packed up inside AOS will also be deployable on the Amazon EC2 utility running RHEL 5.

Clearly, Red Hat has high hopes for its implementation of Linux, and it believes that the first six months of shipments for RHEL 5 portend good things. RHEL 5.0 was announced in March and has been shipping for the past six months. So far, Red Hat has 18,000 servers using its integrated virtualization software. The company says that it believes customers will deploy more than 50,000 servers using the Xen hypervisor woven into RHEL 5.1 before the first full year of shipments are out. That is a pretty steep hockey stick curve for shipments, and it implies that it could be as much as 120,000 servers by this time next year if it is a normal S curve. Looking out ahead seven years, it is not hard to imagine millions of servers running RHEL. Of course, the imagining is the easy part.


RELATED STORIES

Red Hat, IBM Commit to Better Mainframe Linux

rPath Linux Packages Up Amazon's Grid Computing

RHEL 5: How's It Going?

Red Hat to Push Desktop Linux with Intel Partnership

Brazilian Game Site Chooses Hybrid Mainframe-Cell Platform

Red Hat Integrates and Simplifies with RHEL 5

Mainframe Shops Charged Big Bucks for SLES 10 Linux

Mad Dog 21/21: The Grinchy Code

Novell Gives Mainframe Shops Cross-Platform Linux Licenses



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editors: Dan Burger, Timothy Prickett Morgan, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Delroy
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
nuBridges:  Linux-based software for electronic data interchange and secure managed file transfer
IT Security:  Solutions for your Windows & Linux environment

 

 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95


 
The Four Hundred
IBM Brags About Its Power6 Server Shipments

Neuwing, IBM to Quantify and Monetize IT Energy Savings

Ask TPM: Enticing Users to Upgrade Their i5/OS Hardware

Project ECLipz Surfaces, But Not the Way You Think

The Linux Beacon
Intel Quietly Releases 'Montvale' Itanium Kickers

Cray Revamps Supercomputers with XT5 Designs

Mandriva in a Tizzy after Microsoft Trumps Linux in Nigeria

Neuwing, IBM to Quantify and Monetize IT Energy Savings

Four Hundred Stuff
XAware Takes the Open Source Plunge

Quadrant Refines PPM Offering with IntelliChief 2.0

ARTech Nearly Done with 'Rocha' Rewrite of GeneXus 4GL

VAULT400 Offers Free Insurance with 'Quick-Ship'

Big Iron
Neuwing, IBM to Quantify and Monetize IT Energy Savings

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
V6R1 CL Enhancements

Copy Message Descriptions

Admin Alert: Five Benefits of a High-Availability System

System i PTF Guide
November 3, 2007: Volume 9, Number 44

October 27, 2007: Volume 9, Number 43

October 20, 2007: Volume 9, Number 42

October 13, 2007: Volume 9, Number 41

October 6, 2007: Volume 9, Number 40

September 29, 2007: Volume 9, Number 39

The Windows Observer
Visual Studio 2008 to Ship By End of November

Intel Quietly Releases 'Montvale' Itanium Kickers

Microsoft Unveils Free Enterprise Search Product

Windows Home Server Now Available

The Unix Guardian
SCO to Sell Unix Wares for $36 Million?

Sun Sues NetApp Right Back Over Patents

'Project Indiana' OpenSolaris Preview Debuts

Midrange Shops Get Disaster Recovery Services from IBM

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

BACK ISSUES

Breaking News

Printer Friendly Version





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement