BREAKING NEWS
News While It's Still Hot

Intel Cranks Out Two More Quads, AMD Sets Barcelona Date

Published: August 13, 2007

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

The exchange of fire between Intel and Advanced Micro Devices continues in their chip war today. Intel is putting out two more quad-core Xeon processors for servers and workstations in the wake of AMD finally setting a real launch date for its "Barcelona" quad-core Opteron processors, aimed at the same machinery.

Last week, AMD pushed the clock speed of its dual-core Opterons up to 3.2 GHz and cut prices on single-core Rev E Opterons by between 18 percent and 32 percent, and chopped prices on its dual-core Rev F Opterons by between 17 percent and 30 percent. These moves are an effort to keep Intel at bay until the Barcelona chips arrive.

Intel was ready for that move, and on Monday it will put two more Xeon chips into the field. The first is a high-end "Clovertown" Xeon X5365 chip, which Intel has cranked up to 3 GHz and which has a 1.3 GHz front side bus. The other is a 2 GHz low-voltage Clovertown.

All Clovertown chips are what are sometimes called "quasi" quad core chips, in that they are really just two dual-core chips put side-by-side in a single chip package and sharing a single CPU socket. AMD has tried to make a lot of hay out of the difference between a "real" quad-core chip, such as the Barcelona Opteron design--which really does have four cores on a single chip die--and such quasi quads. And while these benefits will no doubt be demonstrated at the Barcelona launch, they perhaps may not be as significant as getting a technically less elegant quad-core product to market nine months ahead of the competition, as Intel has done with the Clovertowns. The server market is crazy about increasing performance in the same thermal envelope these days and a lot less interested in how it gets done. Intel didn't listen about 64-bit memory extensions to the X86 chip, and AMD used that against Intel. This time around, with quad core designs, Intel did not leave AMD an opening at the same time that AMD's schedule slipped.

While this new X5365 Xeon processor is not exactly cool in that it has a thermal design point of 120 watts, it does provide a significant performance boost over the prior Xeon X5355 part, which runs at 2.67 GHz. The regular top-end Xeon 5300 series chip is the Xeon E5345, which runs at 2.33 GHz and has the same 1.3 GHz front side bus, but which only consumes 80 watts of juice. Intel also has slower 80-watt parts (which have lower prices, too), and two low-voltage variants that run at 1.6 GHz and 1.86 GHz and which have a 50-watt TDP. The new low-voltage part being announced today alongside the Xeon X5365 is the Xeon L5335, which runs at a slightly faster 2 GHz and which has the same 50-watt TDP. None of Intel's microprocessors include an on-chip main memory controller, which consumes roughly 20 watts of juice.

The 3 GHz Xeon X5365 chip costs $1,172 in 1,000-unit quantities, while the L5335 costs $380 per 1,000.

AMD's standard dual-core Opteron part now runs at 3 GHz, and the quad-core Barcelona is expected to debut at only 2 GHz, eventually rising to faster speeds as 2007 comes to a close. Obviously, AMD wants to get the Barcelona clocks up to 3 GHz as fast as it can while staying within the 95-watt thermal envelope of its standard parts. By doing so, AMD might be able to show some performance benefits compared to the Clovertowns. The Barcelona chip is also expected to offer sophisticated power management and virtualization features not available in the Clovertowns, which should also help AMD's competitive position a bit. But, the fact remains that in the past 18 months, Intel has substantially closed a huge performance, thermal, and technology gap that allowed AMD to increase its market share significantly in the X64 processor market for servers and workstations. All of AMD's Opteron chips have on-chip memory controllers, so you have to take that into account when comparing TDP ratings for X64 processors.

In related news, AMD has sent out invitations for an event on September 10 for "the most anticipated premiere of 2007." There is very little doubt that this is the official Barcelona Opteron launch, although AMD did not, as usual, confirm this. A lot of the market was under the impression that the Barcelona chips were coming in August, and the rumor only a month ago was late for a late August launch, just ahead of the Labor Day holiday. But for whatever reason, AMD has pushed the event to after the official end of the summer season.


RELATED STORIES

AMD Gooses Dual-Core Opteron Speeds, Cuts Prices

Intel Sets Up 'Tigerton' Xeon MPs Against Future Opterons

AMD Sets 'Barcelona' Quad-Core Opteron Launch for August

Intel Delivers Low-Power, Quad-Core Xeon Chips

AMD: Native Quad Core Opteron Will Best Intel Quasi Quads

Intel Delivers More Quad-Core Server and PC Chips

AMD Unveils Rev F Opterons, Prepares for Quad Cores in Mid-2007



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editors: Dan Burger, Timothy Prickett Morgan, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Delroy
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

COMMON:  Join us at the Annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
ANSYS:  Engineering simulation solutions for more than 30 years
Scalix:  Advanced email and calendaring for power users in the enterprise

 

The Four Hundred
System i Announcement Wrap Up

IBM Upgrades System i Storage with SAS Drives

Mainframe Vendor BluePhoenix Ready to Purchase ASNA

As I See It: Policeware

The Linux Beacon
Companies Test on Windows, Deploy on Linux

Intel Sets Up 'Tigerton' Xeon MPs Against Future Opterons

The IT Job Market Is More Competitive, Says Gartner

IBM, HP Boast of High Security for Servers with RHEL 5

Four Hundred Stuff
IBM Shows Off Web 2.0 Stuff with Lotus Quickr

Varonis Prevents Unauthorized Access to Unstructured Data

CA Updates System i Development Tools, Renames Them Again

Infor Gives Hitachi Auto's Partners a Leg Up on EDI

Big Iron
SHARE to Emphasize Business Continuity at Upcoming Conference

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
Use WDSc to Develop XSL Transformations

Have Your Cake and Eat It, Too

Admin Alert: Getting Around System i Default Passwords, Part 2

System i PTF Guide
July 28, 2007: Volume 9, Number 30

July 21, 2007: Volume 9, Number 29

July 14, 2007: Volume 9, Number 28

July 7, 2007: Volume 9, Number 27

June 30, 2007: Volume 9, Number 26

June 23, 2007: Volume 9, Number 25

The Windows Observer
Software Assurance is 'Healthy and Vibrant,' Microsoft Claims

Office Communicator 2007 Goes Gold

MojoPac Delivers Windows OS, Apps on a Thumb Drive

SteelEye Delivers CDP for Windows Servers

The Unix Guardian
Q&A: Sun's Top Operating System Brass Talk OS Strategy

Sun Exceeds Margin Goals in Q4 on Flat Sales

The IT Job Market Is More Competitive, Says Gartner

IBM Shows Off Web 2.0 Stuff with Lotus Quickr

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

BACK ISSUES

Breaking News





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement