|
Microsoft Again Postpones Delivery of Windows .NET Servers
by Timothy Prickett Morgan
Microsoft quietly this week pushed out the
expected delivery date for its next generation of server operating systems by several months, or
possibly longer. It seems very likely that the delays in bringing Windows .NET Server, the kicker
to the current Windows 2000 products, has to do with beefing up security and making sure the .NET
Framework it includes does not increase the exposure companies may face in moving ahead.
This would be consistent with the message
that Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman and
chief software architect, has been trying
to get across to company employees and to
customers. In January, Gates launched the
Trustworthy
Computing initiative at Microsoft,
which seeks to instill the idea that the
company's next generation of products has
to do a better job when it comes to security,
even if this means taking a lot more
time bring products to market.
Officially, Bob O'Brien, group product
manager for the Windows .NET Server
division at Microsoft, says that the
delay has to do with performance tuning
on the four Windows .NET Servers. While
extra time will give Microsoft that
option, no one believes this is the real
reason for the delay. Given that faster
and faster processors are available,
Microsoft almost certainly is less
concerned with performance and simply
wants to make sure that the .NET Framework,
which is designed to make the links
between computers and applications more
transparent and liquid, does not inadvertently
introduce security risks that hackers can
exploit. Microsoft stopped all software
development at the company a month ago to
closely scrutinize security issues in
Windows desktop and server operating
systems and their associated programs.
This may have caused the delay, and it
seems likely that Microsoft has built
similar bug and security hunts into its
development process from here on out.
This would be akin to the regular clock
stoppages that NASA builds into rocket
launches, which gives everyone a little
breathing room to check things out as
part of the process, instead of causing
this to delay the launch process.
Windows .NET Server, which was developed
under the code-name "Whistler" and was
known as Windows 2002 for a while before
taking its current name, was originally
slated for the October 2001 timeframe.
At the end of March 2001, Microsoft pushed
Whistler deliveries out to the first half
of 2002. Now the delivery of Windows .NET
Server Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is
expected sometime in summer--perhaps in
August or September. The number of Release
Candidates for Windows .NET Server will
depend on customer feedback, and the
product could actually slip into late 2002
or early 2003, depending on how Microsoft
and its customers feel about the product.
Such a delay has positive and negative
ramifications. On the positive side,
Microsoft will be perceived as doing better
than usual in making its products secure,
stable, and efficient. However, it will
keep products that may or may not have
that label--specifically, Windows 2000
Server editions--in the field for a longer
time than most customers may want. On the
whole, if Microsoft is taking its time
and making Windows .NET Server a more
secure and robust product, no one can slam
the company for that. If this is what is
behind the delay, then the delay--no matter
what cost to its marketing message or
revenue and profit streams--is well worth
it in the long run.
In November 2001, Microsoft announced the
third and final beta of Whistler in four
different versions--Windows .NET Web Server,
Standard Server, Enterprise Server, and
Datacenter Server. The Web Server edition
is optimized for Web serving jobs, as the
name suggests. Standard Edition is aimed
at two-way entry servers (like the Windows
2000 Server), and Enterprise Server is
aimed at four-way and eight-way servers
(like Windows 2000 Advanced Server).
Datacenter Server supports 8-way, 16-way,
and 32-way symmetric multiprocessing.
Windows .NET Server is expected to be
delivered on 32-bit Pentium III and Pentium
4 server processors (both regular and Xeon
flavors), as well as on current 64-bit
"Merced" Itanium and next-generation
"McKinley" chips.
|
Sponsored
By
ASNA |
|
"I've had no formal training for Web site development.
Everything I've learned, I learned on the job, at the keyboard! I couldn't
have done this project without AVR. It let me put my data access skills to
work and put my learning cycles to work on other phases of the project,"
Bill Deady, Senior Programmer/Analyst, Wasserstrom.
Discover how 100-year-old Wasserstrom used ASNA Visual RPG
(AVR) to implement their on-line catalog and shopping cart!
Industry expert Roger Pence describes the simple path that Wasserstrom
took to get their AS/400 data on the Web quickly using their existing
RPG skills.
"This has been the most fun I've had programming in years! Having
programmed in RPG for 19+ years, ASNA Visual RPG made the programming
for this Web application easy. With the examples provided in ASNA Visual
RPG's Web Smarties manual, I was able to quickly pick up the dynamics
of programming for the Web. Using the Internet as my resource guide, I
was able to incorporate various advanced features of HTML, JavaScript,
DHTML, and CSS into this project," Bill Deady.
http://www.asna.com/wasserstrom.asp
|
|