|
IBM Leaves iSeries Thin Client Biz, Third Parties Move In
by Dan Burger
The announcement by IBM that it has stopped selling its
5250 dumb terminals and thin clients for AS/400 and iSeries servers, as of March 26, has the remaining
vendors and resellers scrambling to field customer calls. Although IBM was once the dominant
manufacturer in this arena, the thin client and dumb terminal business is hardly in keeping with IBM's de-
emphasizing of low-margin hardware sales. The thin client business operates on razor-thin margins, much
like the PC business, and the entry of Dell and Compaq in the thin client market means that high
margins are probably unlikely anytime soon.
Because of this intense margin pressure, IBM has outsourced its PC manufacturing, and if the pressure
continues to increase, Big Blue may walk away from it entirely. That Dell and Compaq are interested in the
thin client market at all is an indication of the weakness in the PC industry and their desire to find growth in
other markets that resemble their core PC markets. IT industry forecasters predict that the thin client market
will show growth in the neighborhood of 70 percent per year during the next several years. That's why Dell
and Compaq are coming into this market. IBM, which has never been a low-cost manufacturer of anything,
is leaving it because it cannot compete with these two companies, which push much higher volumes.
Thin client vendors say they are happy IBM has moved out of their neighborhood, and readily point toward
a revitalized market. IBM's final 5250 terminal, the InfoWindow, is currently available only through
authorized resellers, and only while supplies last. Resellers say the supply probably will not last beyond the
end of April. According to IBM, it will continue to offer support for the machines, although the duration of
that support has not been announced.
An estimated 10 percent of the IBM midrange and mainframe market continues to use twinax. And of those
making the transition to Ethernet, many continue to use the dumb terminal for heads-down data entry. The
replacement of dumb terminals is still a good business for many smaller vendors. But a bigger share of
business belongs to the emulation terminals running Microsoft Windows CE, and migrating users in that direction is the
most common trend in the IBM-hosted environments. Some vendors offer Linux-based thin clients as well,
and they do so because Linux is cheaper--being essentially free--than Windows CE, and because it also has
a groundswell of support because of the emergence of open source in the commercial IT market.
IBM has made terminals since there were mainframes and minicomputers, and it has been in the thin client
business since 1996, when the AS/400 Division cut a reseller deal with Network Computing Devices, a maker of the X-terminals commonly
used on Unix systems. Big Blue never seemed to get a good handle on the thin client business, even though
it had, through NCD, a decent head start. The installed base was mostly built on the fact that the product
said IBM on it, which was good enough for a lot of shops. Customer satisfaction was widely considered to
be poor, and some of their needs, particularly among OS/400 shops, were not met. The software behind
early AS/400 thin clients was complex on the server side and limited on the client side, even for simple
5250 terminal replacements. Some companies wanted to buy a machine that could replace a 5250 dumb
terminal and at the same time give a limited amount of PC functionality for running, for example,
rudimentary word processors. They wanted these and other features six years ago, and many of them are
now finally available--just as PC prices have plummeted to make thin clients, in some respects, less
attractive.
IBM has handed off its thin client business to Neoware
Systems, a terminal and thin client vendor that used to be known as Human Design Systems. Neoware
has a global presence, but it does not have a particularly strong reputation in the IBM-hosted midrange and
mainframe markets, where things are a little more clubby. Neoware's reputation in the general purpose,
emulator-based thin client market will, no doubt, carry some weight, but several of the smaller companies
that have established themselves with terminal emulation suites for IBM hosts are in a more favorable
position. At the top of these third-party vendors are companies like Affirmative Computer Products, Computer Lab International, and, to a lesser degree, companies
like Decision Data's NLynx Systems and Praim.
With Big Blue pulling out, companies with a focus on IBM midrange and mainframe environments are
anticipating healthy growth. Charles Winslow, president and CEO at Affirmative, says his company had an
annual revenue increase of 75 percent in 2001, and so far in 2002 the revenues are running 80 percent
higher than in the same months in 2001."Some very large companies that we had lost in the past to IBM are
now coming back," Winslow says. "Originally they thought IBM had the staying power and a small
company didn't, but we're still here."
Companies in the thin client arena are bullish on the future. It is generally believed thin clients will
eventually take over a major share of the PC environment. "The overhead of a PC is astronomical," says Al
Wilson, director of sales at Computer Lab International. Wilson says studies indicate that PC overhead is
$4,000 per year, which includes the large staffs to maintain them and the costs of dealing with viruses and
other security issues. "With thin client, you don't get any of that," Wilson says. "It comes with management
software that allows constant upgrading, has no moving parts, and everything is coming through the server,
which avoids viruses." Wilson says industry after industry is changing from PCs to thin clients. The larger
the company, the larger the migration from PCs. "Look at what the Fortune 500 companies are doing," he
says.
In the Neoware/IBM deal, announced in January, Neoware became "the preferred provider" of thin client
appliance products to IBM and its customers. Neoware's thin client appliances are available through
Options by IBM, IBM's premier third-party marketing and distribution program. IBM swapped thin client
software technology as well as terminal emulation and systems management intellectual property in return
for Neoware stock. The financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Howie Hunger, formerly the worldwide marketing manager for thin clients at IBM, and now in a similar
role with Neoware, says IBM customers represent a very significant opportunity, in terms of growth and
qualified leads, and in terms of selling software upgrades to the IBM install base. Sources at Neoware say
the company intends to offer new thin client software for IBM's NetVista 2200, 2800, and N70 products.
Neoware will also apparently unite a new version of its ezRemote Manager software with IBM's thin client
management software.
Hunger developed the thin client strategy at IBM that continues at Neoware. That approach is to transition
the underlying operating system on the thin clients from what had been called V2R1 to a Linux-based
offering. At IBM, the focus was on porting the 5250 and 3270 emulators from V2R1 base to Linux.
Customers were told that Linux was the sole path for transitioning. Neoware is continuing the
implementation of those emulators on its Linux offering. "Users don't know it's Linux," Hunger says. "This
is very much an appliance piece of hardware. It just happens to use Linux as an underlying operating
system." Linux is one of the operating systems available for Neoware and other thin clients. The most
popular environment right now is Windows CE implementation with Internet Explorer. Just about every
thin client supplier uses the same chipset, but internal power supplies and other features differ and are
generally used for differentiation.
The customer requirements for thin clients have changed over the years. Neoware's Hunger recalls that
better than 60 percent of the thin clients IBM was selling in the 1996-1999 time frame were green-screen
replacements. "A very high percentage of those devices, although they were doing emulation, were ordered
by customers wanting to get at Windows applications. Those thin clients were providing access to
multiuser Windows applications [through Citrix
Systems' Metaframe and then later, Microsoft's Terminal Server]. What has changed, in the IBM
marketplace, is an increasing number of customers want a browser in addition to emulation. From 1999 to
the current time frame, it has gone--I am guessing--from a 20 percent rate of using a browser to a 40
percent to 50 percent customer requirement."
"IBM helped by introducing the thin client concept into the market," says Pierre Hernicot, director of
European Operations for NLynx. "Now that it has dropped that business, it has been a door-opener for us.
The demand for thin clients is increasing. We have increased our business by about 25 percent in the past
three months, and the momentum is still increasing." He says that, before the IBM announcement, NLynx's
business was increasing by 5 to 10 percent per quarter.
|