|
IBM Defies Financial Gravity No Longer, Server Sales Down
by Timothy Prickett Morgan
IBM last week did something it hasn't done for more than
a decade: It warned Wall Street that it is not going to make its numbers. IBM has used a mix of financial
engineering tricks to buoy up its earnings in recent tough quarters, but the temptation to play around with
its numbers has evaporated in the wake of the Enron collapse. So IBM's chief financial officer, John Joyce,
played it straight and said that Big Blue's first quarter isn't going to be great.
Joyce told Wall Street that revenues for the first quarter would be in the range of $18.4 billion to $18.6
billion, down about 12 percent from the $21 billion in sales IBM posted in the first quarter of 2001. The
consensus among Wall Street analysts, according to those surveyed by market data firm First Call/Thompson, was that IBM would hit $19.7
billion in sales, despite the tough economic climate. Joyce said that IBM is expecting pre-tax earnings in
the range of $1.65 billion to $1.7 billion, down about 33 percent from the $2.49 billion pre-tax earnings
from the first quarter of 2001. Earnings per share, said Joyce, is expected to be down in the range of 66
cents to 70 cents, which is down about 31 percent from the 98 cents IBM brought to the bottom line in the
first quarter of 2001.
Joyce said that, as IBM has warned in the past year, business conditions remain difficult. He said that
customers were continuing to delay hardware, software, and services purchases because they were not
confident in the supposed economic recovery underway in the United States. He said that IBM is seeing
across-the-board weakness among its business units, and singled out its OEM business from the
Technology Group as one of the reasons for the decline. Joyce said that IBM expected Technology Group's
revenues, which come from sales of custom logic chips, hard disk drives, and displays, among other things,
would be down around 35 percent in the quarter and would lose about $200 million on a pre-tax basis,
accounting for about 8 cents per share in IBM's earnings decline.
Although IBM didn't say it, one of the things that has contributed to its diminished sales and profits at
Technology Group is the significant engineering problems IBM has had with its 10K RPM disk drives,
which have been failing in the field at higher rates than expected for more than a year, as well as its
lateness in bringing out 15K RPM disk drives. IBM has reportedly gone to rival Seagate Technology for the disks its uses in its enterprise servers,
after relying almost solely on its own units in some product lines. This would have the double-whammy
effect of reducing Technology Group's revenues and reducing IBM's profits because it is not getting disks
at cost in its server lines.
The speculation on Wall Street is that IBM's new CEO, Sam Palmisano, is setting the bar low so he can
look like a hero next year when the IT sector rebounds. He can say out loud, and honestly, that he inherited
a bad IT market, and whisper that IBM is changing its ways in the aftermath of the closer scrutiny that all
public companies are getting with so many high-flying companies going bust. IBM is reportedly telling
analysts that Palmisano is now managing expectations and that sales at the end of the first quarter were
disappointing, according to Steve Milunovich, the lead IBM-watcher at Merrill Lynch.
Milunovich has revised downward his revenue and earnings numbers for Big Blue for calendar 2002 and
2003. Milunovich says that he expects IBM's server revenues to be down 14 percent in the first quarter, to
$2.7 billion. According to Merrill Lynch's IBM sales model, sales of iSeries and AS/400 servers and
integrated storage would be down 21 percent, to a meager $325 million. So you can see why IBM is
considering moving up the iSeries Regatta and OS/400 V5R2 announcements--there is no point in waiting
on such announcements when customers are waiting to buy the new stuff (see "Are iSeries Regatta and OS/400
V5R2 Announcements Imminent?" for more on the iSeries Regatta announcements). IBM's mainframe
revenues for the first quarter will be down 7 percent, to $600 million; pSeries sales will be down 17
percent, to $690 million; and xSeries sales will be down 20 percent, to $460 million, says Milunovich.
Milunovich figures that pSeries and xSeries sales won't do much better in the second and third quarters of
2002, and that they won't surge enough in the fourth quarter to compensate for flagging mainframe and
zSeries sales and give IBM the same $4.1 billion server sales for the fourth quarter that it saw in 2001. For
calendar year 2002, Milunovich reckons that IBM will bring in $13.15 billion in server sales, down 8
percent compared with last year. And iSeries sales revenues will drop to $1.58 billion, according to Merrill
Lynch's IBM sales model, down 25 percent from last year's $2.1 billion. Milunovich also figures that
mainframe sales will drop 8 percent, to $2.88 billion, but that xSeries sales for the year will be flat, at just
over $2.43 billion, and that pSeries sales will be up 4 percent, to $3.34 billion. Mulinovich believes that
each of IBM's zSeries, iSeries, and xSeries server lines will experience single-digit growth in 2003, with
the pSeries line experiencing growth possibly as high as 12 percent.
The basic idea that such an economic model makes clear is that not only is the earnings bar going to be a
lot lower at IBM, but so will the bar for server sales. Of course, this can change--if IBM acts boldly and
immediately. With some 550,000 aging AS/400 servers and probably around 10,000 aging mainframes out
there in the world, IBM could aggressively cut prices to churn and modernize those customer bases. Such a
strategy would drive secondary sales of other IBM hardware, software, and services, and would make it
harder for alternative suppliers to get into these IBM accounts. But as long as IBM maintains the status
quo--"the iSeries offers the lowest TCO in the midrange"--and doesn't give OS/400 and OS/390 shops
substantial incentives to upgrade their machinery, Merrill Lynch's model is probably on target. Moving the
pSeries 670 and iSeries Regatta announcements forward two quarters doesn't solve IBM's problems. It just
shifts revenues from the third and fourth quarters to earlier in the year and shifts sales slumps to later in the
year. But the bigger picture will not change unless IBM changes its strategies and tactics.
IBM's general managers in Somers, New York, would do well to consider these numbers from Merrill
Lynch as the Ghost of Quarters Future. A change of heart could change IBM's future. This Tiny Tim, for
one, would sure like to be around in an iSeries business that is more generous, in an enlightened self-
interest manner, and therefore thriving.
|