tlb
Volume 5, Number 4 -- January 29, 2008

The Rumor Mill on IBM's Impending Platform Announcements

Published: January 29, 2008

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

A year ago, when it was just becoming clear that IBM was going to take longer to get its Power6-based server platforms to market than many had expected, there were plenty of rumors going around when IBM would get its revamped System i and System p iron and their respective i5/OS V6R1 and AIX 6.1 operating systems to market. As we headed into summer, mainframe customers heard that the new z6-based machines were coming, and they held back spending, too.

There's just no question at all that IBM had planned to have the Power6 processors and their servers into the field in late 2006, and that problems with Power5+ processors and very likely the complex issues of updating i5/OS and AIX for the very different Power6 chips pushed the roadmaps for Power6 iron out into 2007. Even with that pushed out roadmap, people were expecting Power6 iron in late 2007, and IBM rejiggered an existing 570 server platform, retrofitting it with the Power6 chip and providing basic support for the operating system with patched versions of AIX 5.3 and i5/OS V5R4 in May and July 2007, respectively. IBM has contended that there is no issue with the Power6 chips in terms of design or manufacturing, and yet, here we are with a substantially unchanged product line. To be fair, IBM did get AIX 6.1 out the door in November after six months of beta testing, timing the launch with the delivery of the first Power-based blade server, the JS22, which uses Power6 processors. And IBM did in July preview i5/OS V6R1 and put it out for beta testing, too, making promises to deliver V6R1 in 2008 (not specifics) and having it run on the new blades as well as on rack and tower servers based on earlier Power iron. Even with these delayed product roadmaps, however, the market has been expecting a real Power6 product line in early 2008. Which is now, basically. (See IBM's Rumored System i Power6 Server Plans.) According to some sources, IBM was expected to launch the "real" Power6 server line in maybe January but probably February of 2008.

When IBM's chief financial officer, Mark Loughridge, briefed Wall Street on Big Blue's financial results for the fourth quarter of 2007 two weeks ago, he said made it clear that IBM was going to put the mainframe at the head of the line. Loughridge said that IBM would be launching new mainframes in late February, presumably based on the quad-core z6 processor, that would ship in late February and that would deliver a 50 percent performance bump for customers (much as the jump from Power5+ to Power6 does for System i and System p processors). He added that during the first quarter that IBM would deliver new entry System p machines based on the Power6 chips, and that during the first and second quarter, the remaining System i and System p products would get the Power6 chips. The z6 chips and the Power6 chips both support Linux, of course, and more importantly, Linux partitions are an important driver of sales on mainframe and AIX servers, and to a smaller extent, on i5/OS servers.

Loughridge didn't say anything about i5/OS V6R1 being launched, but I heard only a few weeks ago that IBM was planning a big shindig at the end of January to wrap together a bunch of system announcements. This is indeed happening today, and there will be some announcements about the improvement of the co-existence of Linux and i5/OS.

Back in June 2007, I did a story revealing what the future Power6 machines were expected to look like. No one is certain if these are the machines that Loughridge is referring to, but it seems likely. And it also seems likely that some of the processor feeds and speeds could change, depending on Power6 yields. The future 9407-615 server is expected to use a 3.5 GHz Power6 chip, while the 9408-625 will use a faster 4.2 GHz Power6 chip. The documents for the entry System i machines show them having six small form factor disk drives and five PCI-Express peripheral slots. They may also have InfiniBand ports, or they may not. The 9409-655 server will use a 4.7 GHz Power6 chip. These are the same three clock speeds that IBM is offering in the modified System p 570 server right now; the System i 570 just uses the 4.7 GHz chip to keep it simple. (That 570 box was given a new processor card and a new memory and I/O subsystem to make use of the Power6 chip in the same chassis that the Power5+ chips plugged into.) In all three Power6 machines, according to this source, each Power6 core will be allocated with six DDR2 main memory slots, giving a single processor card up to a dozen memory slots. With 4 GB DIMMs, that puts main memory at 24 GB per core, but most customers will want to use cheaper 2 GB DIMMs, which IBM is almost certainly going to offer on these "real" Power6 machines. IBM will be offering 667 MHz DDR2 main memory, and might offer slower memory for customers worried about heat. The new Power6 servers will also be equipped with a new service processor based on Big Blue's own PowerPC 440 embedded processor, said this source.

There will obviously be a larger 64-socket Power6 machine to replace the high-end System p 590 and 595 and System i 595 servers, and IBM has promised to allow system upgrades (important for accounting reasons) from these older machines to the new Power6 box, presumably called the 695.

Why this is taking so long is a bit of a mystery. My guess is that the microcode changes IBM is making underneath i5/OS V6R1 turned out to be a little more complex than it anticipated. (Some of these changes have to do with new features in the Power6, and some are just changes IBM thinks need to be made in the virtualized computing environment that resides below the compilers and the Technology Independent Machine Interface that is a defining feature of AS/400, iSeries, and System i servers.) And ditto for all that neat new live migration and workload partitioning that IBM is cooking into AIX 6.1. These features were expected as a patch for AIX 5.3 back in late 2006. Clever software always takes longer to deliver than clever hardware. It is ever the way with systems.

And so long as IBM's rivals are all relatively late with updates to hardware and software (as is the case with everything in the market except Intel with its quad-core Xeon chips for two-socket servers), Big Blue is perfectly willing to take a breather and take its time to get the kinks out of this complex software underneath i5/OS V6R1 and AIX 6.1. You know that all of the new general managers of the Enterprise Systems, Business Systems, and Modular Systems units, who are new to their jobs and facing customers and partners, are not eager to push something out the door early; the same holds true for the executives in charge of Power Systems and the System z and System x product divisions. They now how a firewall between their development teams and the customers who use their products, and they will not feel the same pressure to hurry up that IBM's sales teams are feeling. They are being judged on the quality of the products they deliver as much as on the timing.


RELATED STORIES

Weak Dollar, Services, and Power6 Give IBM a Solid Fourth Quarter

Mad Dog 21/21: Motherboarding

IBM Brags About Its Power6 Server Shipments

Power6 Blades Finally Come to Market from IBM

Project ECLipz Surfaces, But Not the Way You Think

IBM Previews i5/OS V6R1, Due in 2008

IBM Upgrades High-End System i Server with Power6

IBM's Rumored System i Power6 Server Plans

IBM Launches First Power6-Based Server

IBM Opens Up Beta for Future AIX 6



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editor: Timothy Prickett Morgan
Contributing Editors: Dan Burger, Joe Hertvik, Kevin Vandever,
Shannon O'Donnell, Victor Rozek, Hesh Wiener, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Thomas
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

Bytware:  The power of McAfee with award-winning StandGuard Anti-Virus for Linux
COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
NowWhatJobs.net:  NowWhatJobs.net is the resource for job transitions after age 40


 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

Getting Started with PHP for i5/OS: List Price, $59.95
The System i RPG & RPG IV Tutorial and Lab Exercises: List Price, $59.95
The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95


 
The Four Hundred
IBM to Buy AMD? Seems Unlikely, But an Interesting Idea

i5/OS V6R1: It Must Be Getting Close, Since People Are Talking

Microsoft Rains on IBM's Lotusphere Parade

As I See It: Avatar Nation

Readers Pipe Up On the STG Reorg and System i Wish List

Four Hundred Stuff
AURA Equipments Beats IBM to the Punch with DB2/400 Engine for MySQL

IBM Sets Sights on Microsoft and SMB with Linux/Domino Combos

Mirroring/400 Considers Move Into U.S. Market

VAI Debuts System i Consultation Services

RJS Updates Document Management Software

Big Iron
CA Offers Mainframe Software Bundles and Freebie Services

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
A Database Union is Not a Join

More About Blocking

Admin Alert: Before You Buy That New System i, Part 2

System i PTF Guide
January 19, 2008: Volume 10, Number 3

January 12, 2008: Volume 10, Number 2

January 5, 2008: Volume 10, Number 1

December 29, 2007: Volume 9, Number 52

December 22, 2007: Volume 9, Number 51

December 15, 2007: Volume 9, Number 50

The Windows Observer
Microsoft Moves to Solidify Virtualization Offerings

Microsoft to IBM: Tolerate PSI Mainframes or Quit Europe

Dell Launches New, Power-Efficient Blade Servers

E-Government Program Unveiled by Microsoft

Microsoft Rains on IBM's Lotusphere Parade

The Unix Guardian
Sun Asks ISVs Why They Love Solaris

Weak Dollar, Services, and Power6 Give IBM a Solid Fourth Quarter

IBM Aims for Server Expansion in 2008

SOA Remains Hard to Define, but Projects on the Rise

The Rumor Mill on IBM's Impending Platform Announcements

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Storix
Guild Companies
Roaring Penguin
IT Security
ShaoLin Microsystems


Printer Friendly Version


TABLE OF CONTENTS
openSUSE Build Service Pumps Out Red Hat, CentOS Packages

IBM to Buy AMD? Seems Unlikely, But an Interesting Idea

Lenovo Licenses X64 Server Designs from IBM to Build Boxes

As I See It: Avatar Nation

SOA Remains Hard to Define, but Projects on the Rise

But Wait, There's More:

The Rumor Mill on IBM's Impending Platform Announcements . . . HP FOSSology: Making it Easier for Companies to Adopt Open Source Apps . . . IBM Tweaks Prices on BladeCenter H and Power Blade Networking Gear . . . Sun Makes an Honest Profit in Fiscal Q2 on Weak Growth . . . IBM Buys AptSoft, Bringing Yet Another Twist to the SOA Story . . .

The Linux Beacon

BACK ISSUES





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement