tlb
Volume 5, Number 6 -- February 12, 2008

Alfresco Puts Out Second Annual Open Source Barometer Report

Published: February 12, 2008

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

Enterprise content management software maker Alfresco Software last year made some big headlines when it gathered up some of its own internal data about its customer set and took it private as a barometer of sorts for the adoption of open source applications among enterprises. The big finding from the July 2007 report from Alfresco was that companies test open source applications on Windows, but deploy on Linux. This time around, Alfresco is asking its customers some more detailed questions and the barometer is therefore a better indicator of the application weather in the data center.

Alfresco conducted its open source barometer survey by polling its 35,000-strong community, which spans over 260 countries. And according to Ian Howells, chief marketing officer at the software developer, the reason why the survey is interesting is not just because of the detailed questions it answers. "Our software has to fit the existing software stacks that enterprises have already chosen, so that is what makes us different," Howells explains.

And that is also what makes the survey data gathered by Alfresco relevant. Of course, you have to ask yourself how statistically significant a poll among users of a particular content management system is when discussing the broader desktop and server platform preferences in the wider IT community. But in the absence of any alternative data--or better still, an aggregation of data from a wide variety of open source products that are deployed by enterprises in productions--the Alfresco barometer is a great conversation piece at the least and perhaps a true indicator of larger movements in the overall IT space. It also helps to keep in mind that the Alfresco community has gained 35,000 members in about a year, growing from next to nothing. This is a huge wave of corporate users, and stunning for a company that was only founded by John Newton, a co-founder of Documentum (now part of EMC), and John Powell, formerly chief operations officer of Business Objects (acquired in 2007 by SAP).

This time around, Alfresco's numbers suggest some refinements. Specifically, developers tend to test open source applications on a Windows laptop and then deploy applications on a Linux server in production. This is inferred from two sets of data. Among the new users of the Alfresco product added in 2007 (and surveyed as part of the download process), 51 percent downloaded a Windows version of the software, compared to 30 percent for Linux and 6 percent for Unix (including Mac OS X, which is a Unix variant). Some 44 percent of new users to the Alfresco CMS said that they test it on a laptop, which suggests strongly that open source projects should make sure their code works well on popular laptops if they want to be successful. This compared to the 26 percent who deployed their trial Alfresco software on a company server, the 22 percent who used a hosted version of the product, and the 8 percent who left the question blank. When it comes to recent deployments, 64 percent of Alfresco's users deployed the software on Linux, compared to 22 percent for Windows and 14 percent for Unix (again, including Mac OS, which had 5 percent).

The other interesting thing to come out of the Alfresco barometer survey is the growing popularity of Ubuntu among Linux shops. According to the survey, Red Hat's Enterprise Linux accounted for 21 percent of installations of Alfresco (this is a mix of trial and production data), compared to 9 percent for Novell's SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and 23 percent for Ubuntu. If you add in Fedora to the RHEL variants, you get 35 percent, and if you add the other Debian distributions to Ubuntu you get 38 percent. Adding up SLES and openSUSE only brings the Novell total up to 13 percent. If you compare the data from the 2008 barometer to the earlier one from 2007, then Red Hat installations for supporting the Alfresco CMS are up 21 percent and Ubuntu is growing at 24 percent, compared to flatness for SUSE Linux. Why this is the case is not clear. "My feeling is that developers lean toward Ubuntu, while corporations tend toward Red Hat," says Howells.

Geography matters, however. While Red Hat Enterprise Linux is preferred by a factor of two-to-one worldwide for deploying the Alfresco CMS, in Germany, where SUSE hails from, SLES outnumbers RHEL by a four-to-one ratio. Interestingly, Howells thinks that the partnership with Microsoft helped Novell make some serious money from Windows shops who were curious about Linux, but it has not done anything, if the Alfresco data is representative, to boost the installations of SLES among enterprises.

On the Windows side, users are still deploying Alfresco's CMS on Windows XP (63 percent) and Windows Server 2003 (28 percent). Windows Vista only accounted for 2 percent of installations among the Alfresco community polled for the barometer survey.

On the database front, MySQL accounted for 60 percent of the installations, compared to 14 percent for an Oracle database or 13 percent for Microsoft's SQL Server, 9 percent for the open source PostgreSQL database, and 2 percent for IBM's DB2. The open source Tomcat application server accounted for 70 percent of installations, compared to 18 percent for Red Hat's JBoss Application Server. Sun Microsystems' Java Application Server accounted for 4 percent, Oracle's soon-to-be BEA WebLogic had 3 percent, and IBM's WebSphere had 3 percent.

Among those customers who use Alfresco in a virtualized environment, VMware's ESX Server and VMware Server products dominate, with 61 percent of installations, followed by Microsoft's Virtual Server at 16 percent, the Xen hypervisor (in its several flavors) at 9 percent, followed up by Parallels at 5 percent.

The lesson to be learned from this data, according to Howells, is simple. "Companies want an open source standard bearer," he says. "So at each level in the stack, you will see one genuine open source alternative," he says. So it ends up being Windows versus Linux, VMware versus Xen, and so forth. The Web application servers get a little messier, of course, with many open source alternatives and Tomcat, at least as far as Alfresco goes, dominating.


RELATED STORY

Companies Test on Windows, Deploy on Linux



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editor: Timothy Prickett Morgan
Contributing Editors: Dan Burger, Joe Hertvik, Kevin Vandever,
Shannon O'Donnell, Victor Rozek, Hesh Wiener, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Thomas
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

Bytware:  The power of McAfee with award-winning StandGuard Anti-Virus for Linux
COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
NowWhatJobs.net:  NowWhatJobs.net is the resource for job transitions after age 40


 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

Getting Started with PHP for i5/OS: List Price, $59.95
The System i RPG & RPG IV Tutorial and Lab Exercises: List Price, $59.95
The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95


 
The Four Hundred
WDSC Is Out, Rational Developer for System i Is In

Q&A with MKS CEO Philip Deck: Automating the Automaters

The System i Loses One Big Account and a Mid-Sized One, Too

As I See It: Why IT Will Save the Economy

High Voltage DC Systems for Data Centers Cut Power Use

Four Hundred Stuff
New Web Console Debuts with i5/OS V6R1

RPG to .NET Reduces Maintenance Pain, Adds Rich User Interface

IBM Makes DB2 Web Query More Affordable

Bug Busters' HA Offering Gets Role Swap Function

Security Vulnerability Reported in i5/OS

Big Iron
Novell Partners with SNA to Make Mainframe Linux Easier

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
Setting Up A PHP/Web Environment On System i: Where Do I Start?

Don't Let SQL Name Your Baby

A Checklist For Moving System i Boxes

System i PTF Guide
February 2, 2008: Volume 10, Number 5

January 26, 2008: Volume 10, Number 4

January 19, 2008: Volume 10, Number 3

January 12, 2008: Volume 10, Number 2

January 5, 2008: Volume 10, Number 1

December 29, 2007: Volume 9, Number 52

The Windows Observer
Free At Last: Microsoft Ships Windows Server 2008

Microsoft Offers $44.6 Billion for Yahoo!

High Voltage DC Systems for Data Centers Cut Power Use

The X Factor: Survive, Adapt, Repeat

VMware Revs Desktop Virtualization Offerings

The Unix Guardian
The Power6 Server Ramp: Better Than Expected

Rock and Tukwila Are the Stars of ISSCC This Week

Who Needs a Web Application Firewall?

The X Factor: Survive, Adapt, Repeat

High Voltage DC Systems for Data Centers Cut Power Use

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Storix
Guild Companies
Roaring Penguin
Gabriel Consulting Group
ShaoLin Microsystems


Printer Friendly Version


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Alfresco Puts Out Second Annual Open Source Barometer Report

Rock and Tukwila Were the Stars of ISSCC Last Week

Virtualization Software Player Announcement Roundup

As I See It: Why IT Will Save the Economy

Who Needs a Web Application Firewall?

But Wait, There's More:

Gartner Looks at the Big IT Issues for the Next Few Years . . . Red Hat Gets SAP Mainframe Cert, Hires New Exec in Japan . . . Dell Rejiggers Distribution for Athlon and Opteron Machines . . . The PHP Community Starts the PHP 4 Sunset, Gears Up for PHP 6 . . . IBM Emphasizes Security with OpenID and NSA Commitments . . .

The Linux Beacon

BACK ISSUES





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement