tlb
Volume 5, Number 16 -- April 22, 2008

Canonical Launches Ubuntu 8.04 with Long Term Support

Published: April 22, 2008

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

As expected and right on time, commercial Linux distributor Canonical this week launched its next iteration of Ubuntu Linux, dubbed 8.04 because it ships in April 2008. Ubuntu 8.04 comes in server and desktop variants, and is available with extended support, which Canonical calls Long Term Support and which guarantees that tech support and security patches will be available for five years on servers and for three years on desktops.

The updated Ubuntu comes just as the company is winding down support for the first and prior LTS edition of Canonical's Linux, Ubuntu 6.10 LTS, which we told you about a few weeks ago. Ubuntu is itself a tweaked version of Debian Linux; it is probably safe to say that Ubuntu is also the most important version of Debian Linux in terms of commercial servers, but Xandros would probably argue with that assessment, as would a few other projects. Anyway, it is the LTS part of Ubuntu 6.10 LTS that made Ubuntu's variant of Linux credible in the data center, and two years of use among some enterprises and now a much more sophisticated Linux offering will presumably make Ubuntu 8.04 LTS an even more popular choice.

Mark Shuttleworth, Canonical's founder and chief executive officer, said in announcing Ubuntu 8.04 that this is the company's "most significant release ever" and that the effort to create it took two years of sustained effort by Canonical, the Linux community, other related projects, and Ubuntu contributors.

Because enterprises like regularity--something that Unix and Windows releases have not historically provided--Shuttleworth made a commitment to get LTS versions and point release updates out the door like clockwork--something no other Linux distributor has committed to. He said that the original plan was to do LTS versions every 18 to 36 months, in essence going with the flow of the underlying projects and trying to make it as regular as possible. Rather than take that flexible approach, Canonical is going to get religious about schedules--and do so because it believes that regularity of updates is as important as providing enterprise-class tech support to corporate customers wanting to deploy Linux in their data centers. "We are now confident that we can deliver an LTS release every two years, like clockwork," bragged Shuttleworth.

As for point releases, the first one for Ubuntu 8.04 LTS will come out in July, but after that, releases will come out every six months. (The point releases are important because it is here that support for new processors or I/O features, as well as hot new application software, can be injected into the Ubuntu version. You can't wait too long to do these or you fall behind other distros, and you can't do it continuously or you will drive your customers nuts.) Shuttleworth added that the firmness of his commitment to regularize LTS versions at two years and point releases every six months could only be changed by one thing: If all of the other Linux distributors would commit to regular version and release schedules, he would tweak the Ubuntu schedule to get in phase with them.

Many of the features of Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server Edition, which has over 500 applications in it and over 20,000 applications that can be plunked atop it from the Ubuntu repository or other open source projects, have been reported on in this newsletter as they were being developed. But here is a brief recap. Like other commercial Linuxes, Ubuntu has spent a lot of time and effort embedding virtualization into its Linux variant, complete with tunings and optimizations. The standard Ubuntu 8.04 kernel assumes that you will want to run the Kernel Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor created by Qumranet to create virtual Linux slices on your machine. KVM partitions can run various Linuxes, Windows, and Unixes that have been created for X86 and X64 processors. (See this page for the list of guests that KVM supports.) Ubuntu 8.04 also has an alternate kernel that has been optimized for the open source Xen hypervisor controlled by Citrix Systems and thus far the preferred hypervisor used by Linux rivals Red Hat and Novell. There is also a stripped down version of the system called Ubuntu JeOS, which is meant to be the Linux to host software appliances that in turn run in VMware ESX Server or KVM partitions. And, of course, the full-blown Ubuntu 8.04 server edition can be run inside ESX Server partitions as well as on the desktop VMware Workstation hypervisor; the software is being certified for these hypervisors now.

Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server Edition also includes FreeRadius for authentication, Munin for monitoring, OpenVPM for virtual private networking, and Bacula for backup and archiving. The kernel has been hardened for security as well, and Novell's AppArmor policy-based application security software is loaded by default in Ubuntu 8.04 on the server; some elements of Red Hat's rival SE-Linux kernel security have also been added to Ubuntu. The software includes a firewall, support for iSCSI storage, and is upgradeable from the Ubuntu 6.06 LTS server edition.

The one thing that Ubuntu 8.04 does not have, by the way, is support for Sun Microsystems's multicore Sparc T1, T2, and T2+ processors. Ubuntu 6.06 LTS and Ubuntu 7.04 and 7.10, which were not LTS releases, did have support for the Sparc T1 processors, and both Sun and Canonical made a lot of noise about this at the time. But Sparc T processors are no longer part of the standard Ubuntu distribution, beginning with the 8.04 release. The Sparc T support has been put out to the same ports.ubuntu.com pasture where the Power processor support was put two years ago. So much for that experiment.

"Our relationship with Sun has grown," explained Shuttleworth, who says that Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server Edition has been certified to run on a number of Sun's "Galaxy" X64 servers. (Sun has stopped short of preloading Ubuntu on its machines, which is about the same limbo that Hewlett-Packard has placed Sun's Solaris in on its own ProLiant servers.) "There are many people who deploy Linux on Sparc, but we found that they either wanted to support Linux themselves, such as among HPC customers, or they wanted support from Sun." Well, maybe Sun should just buy Canonical and get it over with. They already give a paycheck to Ian Murdock, the co-creator of Debian. Might as well take over the biggest Debian Linux distro. . . .

While Sun has certified Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server Edition on some Galaxy machines, HP and Dell are just dipping their toes in the water and have committed to participate in a hardware enablement program with Ubuntu. This program allows joint tech support between the Canonical support team and their equivalents over at HP and Dell, but it falls short of full platform certification. Shuttleworth says that Canonical is obviously keen on getting mainstream server platforms certified to run Ubuntu or preloading it, but was careful not to slight in any way the tier-two players who already do this.

On the desktop front, Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop Edition has the same basic technology, but is tweaked for desktop environments, meaning it is tuned for laptop and desktop iron and comes with other software features. For instance, the new Ubuntu has been certified to support IBM's Notes/Domino groupware, which should make it a viable option on tens of millions of desktops inside corporations. The new distro is also the first to put out the Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 5 Web browser.

Both the server and desktop editions of Ubuntu 8.04 LTS are distributed for free, and will be available beginning April 24. A one-year contract for 9x5 business support for Ubuntu desktop costs $294 and for Ubuntu server costs $881, while a 24x7 contract costs $1,058 for the desktop and $3,819 for the server.


RELATED STORIES

Ubuntu 6.10 Comes to the End of the Line

Canonical Ships Landscape System Management Tool for Ubuntu

Canonical Sets Ubuntu 8.10, Taps KVM Virtualization

How Is Ubuntu Doing as a Server Platform?

Ubuntu Hits Launch Target for 7.10 Linux Release

KVM Developer Launches as Qumranet with Desktop Virtualization

Canonical, VMware Create Skinny Linux for Virtual Appliances

Ubuntu Opens Up Development for LTS 8.04, Due in April 2008

Ubuntu Puts Out Fifth Alpha of Future Linux

Sun, Canonical Integrate Java, GlassFish, and NetBeans into Ubuntu

Canonical Updates Ubuntu Linux with 7.04 Release

Ubuntu to Support Linux on Sparc T1 Chips



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editor: Timothy Prickett Morgan
Contributing Editors: Dan Burger, Joe Hertvik, Kevin Vandever,
Shannon O'Donnell, Victor Rozek, Hesh Wiener, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Thomas
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

Bytware:  The power of McAfee with award-winning StandGuard Anti-Virus for Linux
COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2009 conference, April 26 - 30, in Reno, Nevada
NowWhatJobs.net:  NowWhatJobs.net is the resource for job transitions after age 40


 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

Getting Started with PHP for i5/OS: List Price, $59.95
The System i RPG & RPG IV Tutorial and Lab Exercises: List Price, $59.95
The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95


 
The Four Hundred
IBM Expands VIP to All Systems for Precision Sales

Power Systems Adds New Choices for IBM's Academic Initiative

IBM's Q1 Driven by Mainframes, Unix, Services, and the Weak Dollar

The X Factor: Everybody Wants Citrix Systems?

HP Goes Visual with Application Modernization Tools

Four Hundred Stuff
i-Based SCS500 Internet Phone System Now Available

Raz-Lee Flushes Out Fraud with Application Security Tool

ARCAD Looks to Aid Application Modernization Projects with Updated Software

BOSaNOVA Goes Semi-Rugged with New Thin Client

Quadrant Updates IntelliChief with Web Forms

Big Iron
HP Goes Visual with Application Modernization Tools

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
More about SQL and Logical Files

Performance Advice from a Mysterious Friend, Part 5

Admin Alert: V6R1 Changes for the i5/OS Administrator, Part 2

System i PTF Guide
April 12, 2008: Volume 10, Number 15

April 5, 2008: Volume 10, Number 14

March 29, 2008: Volume 10, Number 13

March 22, 2008: Volume 10, Number 12

March 15, 2008: Volume 10, Number 11

March 8, 2008: Volume 10, Number 10

The Windows Observer
Will Bloat and Complexity Get the Best of Windows? Probably Not

More Wheeling, But No Dealing in Micro-Hoo

Microsoft Unveils New Security Vision as 'Stirling' Goes to Beta

As I See It: Misera Plebs Contribuens

Windows and Linux Get a Skinny Blade Server from IBM

The Unix Guardian
Sun Plans to Scale T2+ Servers to Four Sockets, Maybe More

And Then There Was One: The New and Improved Power 570

Sundry Power Systems Announcements

As I See It: Goldilocks and the Zen of IT

Server Makers Start Shipping Barcelona Boxes

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Storix
Guild Companies
Roaring Penguin
IT Security
ShaoLin Microsystems


Printer Friendly Version


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Canonical Launches Ubuntu 8.04 with Long Term Support

Novell Puts Out JEOS Beta, Starts Appliance Effort

Server Makers Start Shipping Barcelona Boxes

The X Factor: Everybody Wants Citrix Systems?

IBM's Q1 Driven by Mainframes, Unix, Services, and the Weak Dollar

But Wait, There's More:

IT Shops Worried About Energy, But Cutting Power Isn't Happening . . . Let's Unscramble IBM's Server Sales in Q1 2008 a Little . . . Sun Updates Streaming System, Adds Solaris Support . . . IBM Expands VIP to All Systems for Precision Sales . . . Thanks to Convergence, i 6.1 Shops Get PAVE Linux-X86 Emulation . . .

The Linux Beacon

BACK ISSUES





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement