tlb
Volume 4, Number 34 -- September 18, 2007

HP Engineers New Blade Server Box for SMB Shops

Published: September 18, 2007

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

Server makers have finally figured out that enterprise-grade blade server systems that require raised floor data center environments and 240-volt electricity are not going to appeal to small and medium businesses that tend to cram their computers into corners and closets. Last week, Hewlett-Packard, which has taken the lead in the blade server space after losing it to IBM over the past few years, is finally bringing a blade system--true to the name of its BladeSystem product line--to market that is engineered for SMB customers.

Like larger enterprises that have been embracing blade servers for certain infrastructure workloads, mid-market customers and even small enterprises have long wanted some of the ease of use, integration, and ease of installation capabilities that come through the use of blade servers, which these days integrate processors and memory, storage, and switching on all blades within a single chassis. But a blade server with 14 or 16 server slots in it is overkill for an SMB shop that might only have a half-dozen servers and will not grow beyond this point. It is a lot to ask a customer to get a large chassis and run it one third full.

The c-Class 3000 chassis that HP announced last week is a smaller box than its older and larger c7000 chassis brother, and it is designed not to just hold compute nodes, but disk and tape storage as well. And it is designed with gadgetry and a vast partner channel in tune with SMB customers to help them select, build, install, and maintain the machinery.

HP executives, who spoke during a Webcast launch event, made a big deal that this new chassis was engineered specifically for mid-market customers, what they called the "Global 500,000." Deborah Nelson, senior vice president of marketing and alliances at HP's Technology Solutions Group--which is the part of HP that makes servers, storage, and services aimed at businesses--said that companies with between 100 and 1,000 employees face many of the same problems as larger enterprises, and that they want to solve them with technology, but their requirements are different. Because, for instance, IT employees tend to be generalists at midrange shops, and they want their technology to just plug together and work.

Ann Livermore, the executive vice president in charge of TSG, said that according to HP's customer surveys, mid-market customers want technology that is tailored to them. "They are tired of being sold water-down enterprise solutions," she explained. "We have heard very clearly that customers want a bladed storage environment, and they want it all in a single, rackable system."

Well, yes. And they also want it to plug into a wall socket, which is something many of us have been saying since blade servers first came out in 2000, and they want it to actually fit in the closet, which is a tough thing to do with a half-height standard server rack. (I say this from personal experience.) Moreover, what these SMB customers undoubtedly wanted was such a machine many years ago, and the real wonder is why it has taken so long for server makers to make it happen. The good news is, server makers are finally giving SMB shops blade server setups that fit their needs better.

The new blade box, which is nicknamed "Shorty," has its blades oriented horizontally when it is in a rack and, just special for SMB customers, can be mounted on a wheeled pedestal like the Compaq deskside servers from a decade ago, before rack-mounted machines took over the data center. The Shorty chassis has room for four full-height blades or eight half-height blades--half the number that fit in the c7000 chassis that HP announced last summer and that has been driving its sales and its market share gains since that time. The Shorty chassis has a 6U form factor, compared to the 10U form factor of the c7000 chassis. It has a single Gigabit Ethernet link and three interconnect bays for linking server, disk, and tape blades together inside the chassis; the enterprise-class chassis has eight bays for interconnect switches. The unit has up to six fans (compared to 10 for the larger chassis) and runs on either 110-volt or 240-volt power. The box also has only one on-board service processor, while the c7000 has redundant service processors in case one fails. The c7000 mounts its blades vertically instead of horizontally, but when the c3000 is tipped on the side to be put on wheels for a deskside or closet unit, the blades are vertical. (The orientation does not make that big of a difference, although vertical blades help with cooling a bit.)

All existing c-Class blade servers made by HP can plug into the c3000 chassis, just as they do in the c7000 chassis, which means customers can choose from Xeon, Opteron, or Itanium blades to support their workloads and a mix of Windows, Linux, HP-UX, and OpenVMS. The SB600c iSCSI storage blade that HP announced earlier this year plugs into the unit; this device has a RAID 5 controller, a Xeon processor running Microsoft's Windows Storage Server R2, and eight SAS disks for a total capacity of 1.16 TB; SB400c expansion blades, which have six SAS drives on them, can also plug into the chassis, and another 9 TB of disk capacity can be attached to the unit and shared by the blade servers inside of it through outboard iSCSI links. The chassis also supports a DVD drive that can be shared by all server blades, the Ultrium 448c tape blade, and various kinds of switches to connect to external storage and networks.

The Shorty unit includes a 3-inch LCD screen that interfaces with the service processor, which has been equipped with simplified management and monitoring software for shops that would not know a Fibre Channel port from a Gigabit Ethernet plug. Because of the blade architecture, all components in the unit slide in and plug directly into the backplane for power and connectivity. There are no cables, which makes it a lot easier than installing surround sound on your HDTV. HP has also equipped the service processor with features to allow partners to remotely monitor and manage the c3000 chassis and its components for the many SMBs that do not have a formal IT shop to maintain the gear they tuck away in corners and closets.

Perhaps the most interesting feature of this new c3000 chassis is that HP has done the work and testing to ensure that it can run in a 100-degree (Fahrenheit, people, not Celsius) environment, which I can tell you from personal experience is not hard to hit inside a data closet (what else would you call such a mini data center?) on a hot summer day in New York City. By allowing it to operate at such temperatures, the Shorty chassis is going to end up all over the company--just like minicomputers and midrange servers from days gone by did. HP is hoping to generate some marketing buzz because of this, and the Shorty chassis has its own MySpace page and HP is hoping that customers talk about the weird places they put these boxes in.

So are mid-market customers going to buy Shorty? Are they going to make the switch to a smaller blade chassis and rack them or roll them in towers? According to Paul Miller, vice president of marketing for HP's Enterprise Storage and Servers unit, the breakeven point where this machine makes sense compared to rack or tower servers is at three to five servers. Simpler servers are easier to cost justify, but the relatively high expense of blade switching gear machines pays off after a few more servers are added to the mix. On the c7000 chassis, which is much expansive and more expensive, the breakeven point in the rack-versus-blade comparison is from five to eight servers. Clearly, the c3000 chassis is a better financial and technical fit for mid-market customers.

The c3000 chassis is available now in a rack-mounted configuration and costs $4,299; the c7000 chassis costs $5,399. Switches cost thousands of dollars, depending on the speed and bandwidth they offer, and blade servers cost roughly $2,500 to $3,000, depending on processor type and memory for two-socket blades. A base storage blade without any disks in it costs $1,599, and that iSCSI SAN blade costs $9,968. The tape blade costs $1,999. So when HP says that customers can get into a Shorty machine starting at $8,000, this is not even close to the initial sticker price of the box. A real configuration is probably something on the order of $25,000 to $30,000. Of course, this is a complete data center for a mid-market customer, all in two square feet of floor space that plugs into wall socket power.


RELATED STORIES

IBM Rejiggers BladeCenter for SMBs

Hitachi Aims New Blade Server at SMBs



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
STORIX

Why File-based System Backup is your Best Bet
File-based, Full System Backups Create Advantages Over Image-based Backups

File-based backups used for system recovery have been around for years. And, until recently, file-based meant a long, painstaking, manual process capable of turning off even the most meticulous system administrator. Image-based backups, then, seemed to solve this problem by eliminating the need to deal with recreating partitions, filesystems, volume groups or other details related to the system's storage configuration. In an image-based restore, the storage configuration and data from the original system are restored as a whole to the new system. While this method produced fast recovery times, Linux administrators began to realize disk image backup was more of an alternative method with its own set of problems and limitations than an answer to the challenges of manual, file-based backup.

Limitations to Disk Image Backup
Since disk image backups make no distinction between files and instead backup the hard drive as a group of sectors, bare-metal recovery can be quick and easy by simply rewriting a duplicate image onto a new, identical disk drive. A fine solution, as long as the old system and new system are indeed identical in types, sizes, locations- basically the exact same hardware. Any differences in hardware, however, could render an image backup unusable.

Many system administrators know first-hand the frustration caused by the inflexibility of image-based backup. "What I hear time and time again from clients is that they switched from image-based backup to file-based because of the limitations they encountered when trying to restore a backup onto different hardware." said Manuel Altamirano, Storix Software Director of Sales and Marketing. "Administrators assume they will have access to identical hardware after a disaster or for migration when the time comes. Unfortunately, so often this is not the case. Companies are left with unplanned, excessive downtime."

Even more advanced disk image backup products, that offer alterations to disk partition tables, still fail to understand more advanced and increasingly common storage configuration tools such as the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Software RAID (meta-disks) that also must be altered to match new hard disk configuration before data can be restored. In these cases, users must manually alter and build the configuration, usually through command-line utilities and manual editing of configuration files. This also requires users to have knowledge on how to make a system bootable. Rebuilding a system using a disk image backup requires experienced Linux administrators and could take days, weeks or longer resulting in crippling downtime for an organization.

Advances in File-based Backup
File-based backup tools today can automate the process of recording every aspect of a system separately such as disk, filesystem and boot loader configuration while supporting all popular Linux storage configuration tools (i.e. LVM and Software RAID). This detailed backup information is used to greatly simplify the recovery of a failed system from scratch, even if hardware differences are detected on the new system. Furthermore, systems rebuilt from the ground up using file-based backups often times operate better than the original because there is virtually no fragmentation when the restore is completed.

    Flexible recovery based on file-based backup
    File-based backup products have the ability to reconfigure disks, partitions, filesystems and other storage solutions to fit onto new hardware. This ability to adapt a backup to fit new hardware or alter the system's storage configuration is called "Adaptable System Recovery" or ASR. Only backup solutions that gather details about the original system have enough information and flexibility to make the ASR process of altering configuration so simple even novice Linux administrators can quickly perform the recovery. Once new configuration is completed, data files from the backup are easily restored onto the new hardware. Finally, the system is made bootable based on the new hardware.

    The revolutionary adaptability of ASR found in file-based backup tools creates further added value for system administrators because these products can now be used for far more than just reactive tasks such as disaster recovery.
    Applications for ASR:
    Reactive
  • Disaster Recovery- restore systems in minutes after a crash, even if hardware is not the same as the original
    Proactive
  • Provisioning/cloning- a single backup "golden image" can be used to provision different systems, even if disks, adapters or other elements are not the same.
  • Storage software migration- change configuration on the same system for improved performance and availability
  • Hardware migration- install the same system onto newer or virtual systems
    New system backup management features
    Products using file-based system backup have not neglected to consider a system administrator's daily backup responsibilities. These products now incorporate functionality for backup management as well as some of the most advanced features seen in backup and recovery solutions for Linux and AIX. Some advanced features designed to simplify daily backup management for system administrators include:
  • Graphical, Web and Command line interfaces
  • Local and remote backups to disk or tape devices
  • Sequential and random tape autoloader support
  • Support for SAN storage solutions
  • Tivoli Storage Manager integration
  • Oracle database backup support
  • Backup data encryption
  • Multiple compression levels

File-based Backup Solutions Provide Most Bang for the Buck
Inexpensive products exist that combine both file-based backup management and ASR in one program. Look for a file-based system backup product with advanced features like those mentioned above. In turn, regular backup responsibilities such as automatically verifying backups and encrypting backup data will become much easier. Additionally, combined ASR capabilities greatly reduce downtime and required expertise for both reactive (even bare metal) and proactive recovery projects. File-based system backup and recovery solutions are an economical and more comprehensive option than their image-based counterparts.

About the Author
Anne Stobaugh is an independent contractor working with Storix Software to educate Linux and AIX users on the advantages of file-based backup and recovery solutions.
www.storix.com
www.stobaughmarketing.com


Editor: Timothy Prickett Morgan
Contributing Editors: Dan Burger, Joe Hertvik, Kevin Vandever,
Shannon O'Donnell, Victor Rozek, Hesh Wiener, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Thomas
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
nuBridges:  Linux-based software for electronic data interchange and secure managed file transfer
Bytware:  The power of McAfee with award-winning StandGuard Anti-Virus for Linux


 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95


 
The Four Hundred
EGL: The Future of Programming for the System i?

Rumored Layoffs at IBM Rochester Not True

HP Beats the System i on Integration for Midrange Shops

LANSA Packages Modernization; Leasing Covers it All

Four Hundred Stuff
Sentillion Aims for Low Cost, Ease-of-Use with SSO Product

Vaulting Over Backups: The Pros, Cons

Bsafe Puts a Smack Down on Rouge IP Traffic

Raz-Lee Eases Compliance with Update to iSecurity

Big Iron
IT Skills Shortage Could Play Out in Favor of Mainframes

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
Reuse Deleted Records? *YES!

Accessing File Member Timestamps from a .NET C# Program

Admin Alert: A Primer for Changing Your i5/OS Startup Program

System i PTF Guide
August 11, 2007: Volume 9, Number 32

August 4, 2007: Volume 9, Number 31

July 28, 2007: Volume 9, Number 30

July 21, 2007: Volume 9, Number 29

July 14, 2007: Volume 9, Number 28

July 7, 2007: Volume 9, Number 27

The Windows Observer
New Test Releases of Windows Server 2008, 'Viridian' Imminent

AMD Gets Aggressive About Watts with Quad-Core Barcelonas

Microsoft Ships BizTalk Server R2

Microsoft Patches Four Security Flaws

The Unix Guardian
Sun Rolls Out Update for Solaris 10 Unix

AMD Gets Aggressive About Watts with Quad-Core Barcelonas

Transitive Rejiggers Emulation Software, Adds Partners

Sirius Expands Northeast Presence with SCS Buy

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Centrify
Storix
Storage Guardian
Roaring Penguin
Vibrant Technologies


Printer Friendly Version


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Canonical, VMware Create Skinny Linux for Virtual Appliances

HP Engineers New Blade Server Box for SMB Shops

SCO Files for Bankruptcy Protection

Transitive Rejiggers Emulation Software, Adds Partners

But Wait, There's More:

Microsoft Bags Two More Big Linux Customers . . . Novell to Add Hooks for VMware ESX Server into Linux Kernel . . . The Linux Foundation Sponsors Legal Summits . . . Virtugo Expands Virtualization Management Tools . . . European Developers Embrace C#, AJAX . . . Eclipse Foundation Delivers PHP Extensions to Open Source Toolset . . .

The Linux Beacon

BACK ISSUES





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement