• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • USDA Farm Service Agency Wants to Consolidation 2,384 AS/400s

    January 15, 2007 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    According to a request for information seeking proposals from IT experts put out by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Farm Service Agency, which operates a network of 2,384 AS/400 Model 170 servers that host applications to help the farmers of America, is looking to simplify its IT infrastructure. And rather than just call IBM Global Services, the USDA posted a request for information to solicit ideas from the world at large to help the farm agency solve its unique problem.

    The FSA network has 2,384 service centers, which host a variety of System/36 RPG, COBOL, and assembler programs that run in the S36 Virtual Machine environment and which support over rural 8,000 counties and 10,000 end users. These applications, which were originally written in 1984 and subsequently maintained and updated over the years, do not run in the System/36 Emulation Environment, but the S36 VM environment, which was last supported in OS/400 V4R4 and which provided a binary compatible System/36 environment for both programs and data running on OS/400 V4R4 machines. Because the applications are accessing the S36 VM, and have not been updated, the USDA is trying to figure out how to consolidate the machinery in all of these field offices into as few as six regional data centers. The reason why USDA wants to do this is because the machines have sensitive personal information on them, but the physical security of the offices is not up to snuff; it is far easier to secure six offices and use telecom to connect users than to try to secure thousands of sites. However, the nature of the file formats used in the applications and the use of the S36 VM environment makes consolidation tricky. USDA is willing to consider recompiling the applications, of course, and given the nature of the problem, this seems unavoidable.

    In any event, the RFI makes for interesting reading, even if the format of the document is not exactly optimal. You can read it here. The USDA really doesn’t want to stop coding in the System/36 environment it knows so well.



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 16, Number 2 -- January 15, 2007

    Sponsored by
    Lightedge

    Your IBM Power Cloud Strategy Should Start With “Why?”

    Moving IBM i to the cloud isn’t just an infrastructure decision.

    A hardware refresh, data center exit, IBM i skills gap, disaster recovery requirement, or broader cloud initiative can each lead to a very different architecture.

    At Lightedge, we start by understanding what you’re trying to accomplish. Then we look at the workload, application dependencies, resiliency requirements, operating model, and long-term strategy to determine where that workload belongs.

    Managed IBM Power cloud? IBM Power Virtual Server? DR in the cloud? A hybrid architecture connecting IBM Power with AWS or Azure?

    There isn’t one right answer for every IBM i environment.

    Start with the business requirement. Understand the workload. Then decide where it belongs.

    Explore IBM Power cloud, managed services, and hybrid solutions from Lightedge.

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Information is Useless: Survey LTO Consortium Spins Ultrium 4 Tape Format with Native Encryption

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 16 Issue: 2

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • IDC Says Global IT Spending Will Kiss $1.5 Trillion By 2010
    • IBM Wins U.S. Patent Count Again as Vendors Build Up Patent War Chests
    • LTO Consortium Spins Ultrium 4 Tape Format with Native Encryption
    • USDA Farm Service Agency Wants to Consolidation 2,384 AS/400s
    • Information is Useless: Survey
    • IDC Says Global IT Spending Will Kiss $1.5 Trillion By 2010
    • Reader Feedback on The System iWant, 2007 Edition
    • Mad Dog 21/21: Between y o u and i
    • Next Generation ERP and the Rise of the Agile Organization
    • Why the Number of Women in IT Is Decreasing

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • PHP’s Evolution On The IBM i Platform Continues
    • Protecting IBM i Data For The AI Revolution
    • Guru: Two More Small But Handy RPG Enhancements: LIKE(*EXT) And %LOOKUPNE
    • IBM i Integration Gives Costco Shoppers Real-Time Inventory
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 33
    • IBM “Price Harmonization” Increases For Power Systems Coming In The New Year
    • Code For i Continues To Grow. Here Is What’s New
    • PowerSC: Your One-Stop Shop For Security On IBM i – And Beyond
    • As I See It: You’ve Been Flocked
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 32

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle