tfh
Volume 16, Number 14 -- April 9, 2007

Is the Adoption Rate of Server Virtualization Technology Over Estimated?

Published: April 9, 2007

by Timothy Prickett Morgan

According to a new report issued by The Strategic Counsel, a consultancy based in Toronto, and commissioned by systems software maker CA, the adoption rate of server virtualization technologies might not be as high as many surveys seem to indicate. It all depends on how you ask the question.

The consensus out there in the server industry is that somewhere around 5 percent and well south of 10 percent of the servers that are sold each day have virtualization technology in one of its myriad forms sold along with that box. This is not a very high penetration rate. However, many surveys in the past few years have shown that server virtualization has been adopted at a very high rate. So CA had the Strategic Counsel put together a survey to try to get to the bottom of that issue.

The Strategic Counsel surveyed 808 IT decision makers in companies of all sorts and with a rather heavy distribution of sites skewed toward fairly large organizations. Over half of the respondents had between 1,000 and 10,000 employees, while another 26 percent had even more employees. Only 23 percent of those surveyed had between 500 and 999 employees, and no one at a company with fewer employees was asked to participate in the survey. Forget for a moment that this is not a representative distribution for the whole server market. It is, however, representative of the high-end of the midrange server space and the enterprise server space, roughly speaking, and data centers for these companies have been using machines with various kinds of hardware and software partitioning for quite some time.

According to the survey respondents, 720 of the 808 companies that participated in the CA-commissioned server virtualization study said that they had either deployed virtualization technologies or planned to do so within the next 18 months, with the remaining 92 saying that they would not. That is an 89 percent penetration rate. So server virtualization is pervasive, right? Maybe not. The Strategic Counsel was honest that it threw out 946 other people who responded to the survey because they did not agree that operating system, hardware virtualization, hard partitions (logical or virtual), or clustering were kinds of server virtualization. When you throw the companies back into the pool who obviously have no idea what server virtualization is--even though it is probably a feature on their servers even if they don't know about it--then the adoption rate for server virtualization technologies among fairly large organizations is a mere 39 percent.

In any event, the study that CA commissioned has lots of other interesting bits of data in it, and you can take a gander at it here. The fact that the study lumped IBM's logical partition (LPAR) into the same basket as Hewlett-Packard's nPar hardware partitions is a bit weird, since LPARs are every bit as virtualized as VMware's ESX Server and GSX Server, Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005, and Sun Microsystems's Solaris Containers. In fact, IBM LPARs are in many ways a much more virtualized way of carving up servers, since LPARs can be fractions of CPUs and span across an entire IBM system with 16, 32, or 64 cores. Sun's Dynamic Domains are correctly identified as hardware partitions.

While it is easy to pick on definitions, the fact remains that the study does give some insight into the penetration of these technologies. Some 77 percent of shops using IBM iron said that they have or will deploy LPARs (this is obviously in the subset of people who knew what server virtualization was), followed by 71 percent for HP nPars and 59 percent for Sun domains. Some 58 percent of those polled said they had or will deploy VMware GSX Server, followed by 50 percent for ESX Server. Microsoft VS 2005 is the big winner in this poll, with 82 percent of those polled saying they have or will deploy it, while Solaris containers have been or will be adopted by 43 percent of those polled.

It is interesting to ponder these numbers, but the study did not actually count virtual machines and physical machines at companies and do a sum across all companies to come up with averages per employee for physical and virtual servers. Or, if the Strategic Counsel did such math, it didn't give away that data in the public report. But this is the math that needs to be done. It would also be interesting to know what percent of total servers (physical plus virtual) are virtualized today, and how companies expect that ratio to change over time. Moreover, a true count would have to ask companies how many virtual machines they have in reserve--virtual instances that are not deployed right now, but which are sitting in a library, waiting to be deployed when they are needed. What you really want to know is how many physical machines are there, how many potential virtual machines can be deployed on them, and how many virtual machines, on average, actually get deployed.



                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot


Sponsored By
VAULT400

                                                     ·Off-Site, Encrypted, Compressed
                                                     · Archived, Safe, Automated
                                                     · Instant Back-Up, 24x7 Recovery
                                                     · Starting at 100GB for less than $ 295 p/month

You will relax knowing your data on your System i
(and other platforms) is securely archived with VAULT400 -
knowing you saved a ton on your budget -
knowing you can recover at anytime.

Request a Pricing Proposal and / or
Sign Up for a Free On-Line Briefing at
www.vault400.com/itj


Editor: Timothy Prickett Morgan
Contributing Editors: Dan Burger, Joe Hertvik, Brian Kelly, Shannon O'Donnell,
Mary Lou Roberts, Victor Rozek, Kevin Vandever, Hesh Wiener, Alex Woodie
Publisher and Advertising Director: Jenny Thomas
Advertising Sales Representative: Kim Reed
Contact the Editors: To contact anyone on the IT Jungle Team
Go to our contacts page and send us a message.

Sponsored Links

COMMON:  Join us at the 2007 conference, April 29 May 3, in Anaheim, California
Vision Solutions:  The first new HA release from the newly merged Vision and iTera companies
LASERTEC USA:  Fully integrate MICR check printing with your existing application

 

IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95

 

The Linux Beacon
Intel Shows Off Future Penryn and Nehalem Chip Designs

Cornerstones Laid for the Linux Foundation

Gartner Says It Was "All Over" the Virtualization Effect

Revenue Up, But Profits Take a Hit at Red Hat in Q4

Four Hundred Stuff
CYBRA Finds the 'Edge' for Native i5/OS RFID Software

Lakeview Adds More Autonomics to MIMIX

Thoughts on the Coexistence of Full Test Automation and Manual Testing

Help/Systems Boosts Graphics with Robot/NETWORK V10

Big Iron
IBM Replies To Platform: No More Compatibles

Top Mainframe Stories From Around the Web

Chats, Webinars, Seminars, Shows, and Other Happenings

Four Hundred Guru
FTP Means 'First Try Pinging'

Improving Upon WDSC's Table View

Admin Alert: Graphically Moving i5/OS Objects with OpsNav

System i PTF Guide
March 31, 2007: Volume 9, Number 13

March 24, 2007: Volume 9, Number 12

March 17, 2007: Volume 9, Number 11

March 10, 2007: Volume 9, Number 10

March 3, 2007: Volume 9, Number 9

February 24, 2007: Volume 9, Number 8

The Windows Observer
Microsoft Loosens the Licensing Screws for Vista Virtualization

Microsoft Patches Animated Cursor Flaw in Windows

XenSource Extends and Improves Windows Support with 3.2 Release

Intel Shows Off Future Penryn and Nehalem Chip Designs

The Unix Guardian
Sun Boosts Performance of UltraSparc-IV+ Chips

Intel Shows Off Future Penryn and Nehalem Chip Designs

IBM Offers Rebates on System p5 and ISV Software Bundles

The X Factor: Virtualization Belongs in the System, Not in the Software

Four Hundred Monitor
Four Hundred Monitor's
Full iSeries Events Calendar

THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Software Engineering of America
LXI
Profound Logic Software
Bytware
VAULT400



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Hello, New York? Buy IBM

Security Still an Issue in 2007 for System i5 Shops

A Trained IT Staff Is A Happy and Competitive One

As I See It: The Legacy

But Wait, There's More:

Is the Adoption Rate of Server Virtualization Technology Over Estimated? . . . ERP Vendors CMS Software and XKO Software to Merge . . . Goldman Sachs Says IT Spending Will Soften a Bit in 2007 . . . PHP-Based Mantis Help Desk Application Coming Soon to the System i . . . Zend Issues a PHP Innovation Challenge to i5/OS and OS/400 Shops . . . Complacency Will Get You Killed, Security Researcher Says . . .

The Four Hundred

BACK ISSUES





 
Subscription Information:
You can unsubscribe, change your email address, or sign up for any of IT Jungle's free e-newsletters through our Web site at http://www.itjungle.com/sub/subscribe.html.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Guild Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Guild Companies, Inc., 50 Park Terrace East, Suite 8F, New York, NY 10034

Privacy Statement