• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Johnny Can’t Read and RPG Can’t Do Math

    October 25, 2002 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Hey, Ted:

    I ran into an anomaly and was wondering if you could shed some light on it.

    A subprocedure that I wrote doesn’t return the correct value. The problem is caused by an expression that doesn’t return the value that I think it should.

    Why does the expression, which returns the correct value (.3) in the Test4 evaluation, apparently return an incorrect value (.29999) when combined in another expression?

    H EXPROPTS(*MAXDIGITS)
    D X               S              5  0 Inz(1)
    D Y               S              5  0 Inz(6)
    D  ABC            S             15A   Inz('13077.39')
    D  NUM            S             15  5 Inz(0000013077.00000)
    D  Digits         S             10    Inz('0123456789')
    D   Test1         S             15  5
    D   Test2         S             15  5
    D   Test3         S             15  5
    D   Test4         S             15  5
    D   Rslt1         S             15  5
    D   Rslt2         S             15  5
    
     /Free
          Test1= (.1**X);
          Test2= (%Scan(%Subst(%Trim(ABC):X+Y:1):Digits)-1);
          Test3= (Test1)*(Test2);
          Test4= (.1**X)*(%Scan(%Subst(%Trim(ABC):X+Y:1):Digits)-1);
          Rslt1= NUM + (Test1)*(Test2);
          Rslt2= NUM + (.1**X)*(%Scan(%Subst(%Trim(ABC):X+Y:1):Digits)-1);
          *InLR= *On;
     /End-Free
    

    Running the program in debug produces the following results:

    TEST1 = 0000000000.10000
    TEST2 = 0000000003.00000
    TEST3 = 0000000000.30000
    TEST4 = 0000000000.30000
    RSLT1 = 0000013077.30000
    RSLT2 = 0000013077.29999
    

    RSLT1 and RSLT2 should yield the same value but don’t.

    The problem does not seem to be precision-related, since the incorrect value requires a precision of 5 decimal places to produce and the correct value is only 1 decimal place. I tried both EXPROPTS(*MAXDIGITS) and EXPROPTS(*RESDECPOS) with no effect.

    Any ideas?

    — Paul

    Welcome to the wonderful world of floating point arithmetic, Paul. Your problem reminds me of some of the war stories I used to hear from old timers when I was just getting into this business. Before COBOL was introduced, businesses were using FORTRAN. Rounding errors were an everyday occurrence.

    Here’s some information I received from Barbara Morris of the RPG compiler development team at IBM‘s labs in Toronto.

    Since 1**X is a floating point expression, the whole expression is done in floating point. When you use ** or any floating point value in an expression, you should consider whether you want the whole expression to be done in floating point. If not, use the %inth or %dech built-in functions to return to decimal arithmetic.

    Also, half adjust (eval(h) or %inth or %dech) should always be used with floating point, unless truncation is really wanted.  Using eval(h) for the expressions in this case gives .30000 all the time.

    — Ted

    Sponsored By
    RJS SOFTWARE SYSTEMS

    Implement Document Imaging on your iSeries-AS/400 in 30 minutes or less

    Image Server/400 is a Web browser-based document image management system for the iSeries.

    Documents can be quickly scanned and stored in IFS folders, and then located and retrieved for viewing via any Web browser. Integrate with other iSeries-AS/400 applications.

    Visit us at COMMON, Booth 418, call us at 888-RJS-SOFT, or download a FREE fully functional demo from our Web site at

    www.rjssoftware.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mgo_rc, Volume 2, Number 82 -- October 25, 2002

    Sponsored by
    Raz-Lee Security

    Start your Road to Zero Trust!

    Firewall Network security, controlling Exit Points, Open DB’s and SSH. Rule Wizards and graphical BI.

    Request Demo

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Type2 IFS Directories Reader Feedback and Insights: Thanks for the Information

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

MGO Volume: 2 Issue: 82

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Reader Feedback and Insights: SQL to the Rescue!
    • Another Way to Dump an IFS File
    • Johnny Can’t Read and RPG Can’t Do Math

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Power Systems Grows Nicely In Q3, Looks To Grow For All 2025, Too
    • Beta Of MCP Server Opens Up IBM i For Agentic AI
    • Sundry IBM i And Power Stack Announcements For Your Consideration
    • Please Take The IBM i Marketplace Survey
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 43
    • IBM Pulls The Curtain Back A Smidge On Project Bob
    • IBM Just Killed Merlin. Here’s Why
    • Guru: Playing Sounds From An RPG Program
    • A Bit More Insight Into IBM’s “Spyre” AI Accelerator For Power
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 42

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle