• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Reader Feedback On Blade Servers Barely Nick IBM i Market

    December 12, 2011 Hey, Dan

    Good article. I agree with the complexity from an i-perspective, and liked your detailed analysis. I would like to add another point. I think blades in general are at an awkward junction. I work at a large Intel shop right now, with a mix of Windows (Windows 2000, Windows 2003, and Windows 2008 server) as well as Red Hat Linux (4.X thru 6). Several years ago they started moving from a standard rack mount to blade configuration. A funny thing happened on the journey. It’s called virtualization. Long story short, VM’ing everything has minimalized the need for blades.

    Instead, you buy a big rack-mounted IBM System x3850 or x3950, which is like a big rack-mounted Power7 server, and load up a ton of guests (logical partitions). While you can create a VM host on a blade, what’s the point? The x3850 or x3950 scales much better and ultimately is more cost effective (same discussion on a Power7 blade vs. Power7 rack mount). So right now, blades are relegated largely to single-application Oracle DB servers, as there are Oracle licensing considerations ($) on big Intel hosts. Most of the application servers (blades or rack-mounted) are being retired by virtualizing the app/web servers, etc.

    So, considering both the simplicity “bias” of the i-crowd, as well as the product placement juncture of blades in general (why do you need them anymore in a virtualized world?), I think that explains the reticence of small/medium business to do i-blades. The next step for most small/medium business is to virtualize their Intel farms, blades or rack mounted.

    Regards,

    –Joe

    Dan:

    VIOS could be avoided completely if SVC supported IBM i. As far as I know, IBM has no current or future plans to do so. I know SVC may not be a fit for all shops, but the V in SVC should apply to IBM i as well.

    –Joshua

    I just finished reading your article on the lack of acceptance of system i blade servers. You mentioned the users that are stuck on V5R4. Well, we are in that very spot and would pay IBM good money for the emulator feature. We also are running a product from one of IBM’s large software partners and rep said over their cold dead bodies would they support the development of such an emulator by IBM.

    They stand to make millions from companies stuck on V5R4. Although it would be a wonderful thing for many system i customers, IBM will probably listen to the great and powerful.

    I hold out a faint hope that some third party may see the opportunity for helping those of us in the “stuck” zone get our objects converted for IBM i 6.1 or 7.1 or develop such an emulator. Dream on.

    The real mess is that our current version of the software in question is doing fine for our users. They aren’t being held back and certainly don’t want to spend the better part of $1 million to implement a new ERP package at this time. However, we would very much like to take advantage of the enhancements found in IBM i 6.1 and 7.1 and the latest hardware.

    –Roger

    Thanks for taking the time to write. Hearing stories like yours helps add fuel to the fire we have for getting at real world situations.

    –Dan

    RELATED STORIES

    Blade Servers Barely Nick IBM i Market

    IBM Revives BladeCenter Chassis Giveaway

    Some Insight Into the HMC-to-SDMC Transition

    BladeCenter S Express i Edition Gets a Power7 Upgrade

    Let’s Take Another Stab at Power7 Blade Bang for the Buck

    IBM’s Power7 Blades Pack a CPW Punch

    IBM Bundles RAID into BladeCenter S i Edition, Adds Lots of Networking

    Power-BladeCenter Combo Gets Tweaks for i Shops

    One Less Headache: IBM Preconfigures i 6.1 and VIOS on Blades

    The i Edition of the BladeCenter S Finally Launches

    IBM Rejiggers BladeCenter for SMBs

    Power6 Blades Finally Come to Market from IBM



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    DRV Tech

    Get More Out of Your IBM i

    With soaring costs, operational data is more critical than ever. IBM shops need faster, easier ways to distribute IBM applications-based data to users more efficiently, no matter where they are.

    The Problem:

    For Users, IBM Data Can Be Difficult to Get To

    IBM Applications generate reports as spooled files, originally designed to be printed. Often those reports are packed together with so much data it makes them difficult to read. Add to that hardcopy is a pain to distribute. User-friendly formats like Excel and PDF are better, offering sorting, searching, and easy portability but getting IBM reports into these formats can be tricky without the right tools.

    The Solution:

    IBM i Reports can easily be converted to easy to read and share formats like Excel and PDF and Delivered by Email

    Converting IBM i, iSeries, and AS400 reports into Excel and PDF is now a lot easier with SpoolFlex software by DRV Tech.  If you or your users are still doing this manually, think how much time is wasted dragging and reformatting to make a report readable. How much time would be saved if they were automatically formatted correctly and delivered to one or multiple recipients.

    SpoolFlex converts spooled files to Excel and PDF, automatically emailing them, and saving copies to network shared folders. SpoolFlex converts complex reports to Excel, removing unwanted headers, splitting large reports out for individual recipients, and delivering to users whether they are at the office or working from home.

    Watch our 2-minute video and see DRV’s powerful SpoolFlex software can solve your file conversion challenges.

    Watch Video

    DRV Tech

    www.drvtech.com

    866.378.3366

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: More Information on Semi-Restricted State, Vendor Profiles, and Storage Pools Lowly Fax Still Essential to Business, Study Says

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 20, Number 42 -- December 12, 2011
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

ProData Computer Services
CCSS
Townsend Security
Computer Keyes
WorksRight Software

Table of Contents

  • Get With The Program
  • Tape Can Still Close The Backup Window
  • IBM Off To The Races With New Memory Tech
  • As I See It: Looking Ahead
  • Mad Dog 21/21: The Maltese Logon
  • Happy Holidays And the PM 2011 Edition Fruitcake Recipe
  • Reader Feedback On Blade Servers Barely Nick IBM i Market
  • IBM Bolsters ‘Smarter’ Initiatives with Two Software Acquisitions
  • Michigan PHP Program Progressing Nicely
  • Windows, Linux Big Server Sellers In Q3

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • The Power11 Transistor Count Discrepancies Explained – Sort Of
  • Is Your IBM i HA/DR Actually Tested – Or Just Installed?
  • Big Blue Delivers IBM i Customer Requests In ACS Update
  • New DbToo SDK Hooks RPG And Db2 For i To External Services
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 33
  • Tool Aims To Streamline Git Integration For Old School IBM i Devs
  • IBM To Add Full System Replication And FlashCopy To PowerHA
  • Guru: Decoding Base64 ASCII
  • The Price Tweaking Continues For Power Systems
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Numbers 31 And 32

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle