• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • IT Shops Expect iSCSI and Fibre Channel to Co-Exist

    July 31, 2006 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    If you look at the history of network connectivity, what you will see is that any protocol that comes up against Ethernet, no matter how good it might be initially, eventually succumbs to Ethernet and is supplanted. But that may not be the case until someone creates something I will call iFC, which is short for Internet Fibre Channel. Let me explain.

    A few examples illustrate the point. In many ways, IBM Token Ring was technically a better protocol, offering higher bandwidth, better error correction. So what? In the long run, Ethernet improved, and because non-IBM shops–like the service providers who were responsible for building the Internet–chose Ethernet, that technology won. Similarly, InfiniBand was invented to create a switched fabric for connecting servers to storage and servers to each other, and it offered very high bandwidth and very low latency. But it never supplanted Fibre Channel light pipes between servers and storage, and as for system interconnections, so few vendors have come to market with InfiniBand products that they are relatively expensive and exotic, and Gigabit or 10 Gigabit Ethernet links are now popular at all but some of the largest supercomputing centers and for some clustered database implementations. And with the faster Ethernet links available today, Internet SCSI, or iSCSI, links to hook storage to servers is now giving Fibre Channel a run for the money.

    But, at least according to the sentiments expressed in a survey of storage buyers done by Xiotech, a maker of storage area network (SAN) arrays for Windows, Linux, and Unix servers called the Magnitude 3D, it looks like Fibre Channel and iSCSI will co-exist for quite some time yet. Xiotech put together a survey, which got 110 responses, asking companies about their iSCSI and Fibre Channel plans. (I think 110 responses is kind of meager, but it is also typical of such surveys, so take the results as you will.)

    The respondents in the survey said that while they expected iSCSI to increase from about 5 percent of their storage connectivity today to 19 percent two years from now, they also said that Fibre Channel would grow from 34 percent of their current storage connectivity today to reach 41 percent within that two-year span. Survey respondents said they would be less dependent on direct-attached storage two years from now, dropping from about the storage connectivity they have today (and dominated by SCSI links) to about a quarter of storage links.

    iSCSI is a less expensive storage connectivity option right now, but on the typical Gigabit Ethernet networks it is used on, it also offers much lower performance than the 2 Gb/sec or 4 Gb/sec Fibre Channel links available today for SANs. So it is no surprise that survey respondents gave Fibre Channel a rating of 4.49 on a scale of 5 for performance, compared to 3.55 for iSCSI, and a rating of 4.35 for reliability and 4.16 for security, versus ratings of 3.49 and 3.41 for these same technological aspects for iSCSI. iSCSI got high marks for initial low price, with a rating of 3.55, versus 2.52 for Fibre Channel.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 15, Number 30 -- July 31, 2006

    Sponsored by
    Focal Point Solutions Group

    Comprehensive Data Protection from Focal Point SG

    Your organization needs to be thinking differently about your backup & disaster recovery strategy

    Concerns of the Industry

    • Inefficient manual backup processes
    • Effectively storing data offsite
    • Developing and testing a concrete disaster recovery plan
    • Efficient access to data in a disaster scenario for necessary users
    • Risk of cyber security attack
    • Declining IT staff and resources

    The true cause of the above concerns is an organization’s status quo – 80% of IBM i users currently backup to tape and 40% of companies have no DR plan at all. Don’t wait for a disaster to take action.

    The new way to ensure cost-effective safety

    • Automated cloud backup
    • Two (2) remote sites – redundant storage, power, internet pipe, firewalls, etc.
    • Data encryption at all times – in-flight and at-rest
    • Fully managed remote hardware DR, including remote VPN access for necessary users
    • Regularly simulated phishing tests and cyber security training

    Potential “landmines” in solutions to avoid

    • Single point of storage – no redundancy
    • Misleading data analysis, compression/de-dup ratios, sizing of necessary computer resources for backup and DR
    • Large-scale cloud storage with difficult recovery
    • Inability to meet RTO/RPO

    Don’t get caught like the many organizations we’ve seen with inefficient exposed backup data and no DR plan!

    What VAULT400 has to offer

    Backup

    • Native software agent schedules backups to the Focal Point SG cloud based on your retention scheme
    • Client data is backed up to two data centers in US or two data centers in Canada
    • 256-bit AES encryption in-flight and at rest – only the client has the encryption key
    • Detailed data analysis to ensure proper sizing

    Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)

    • Focal Point SG provides “hands-off” DR – fully managed recovery
    • 60 days of remote VPN access available to unlimited users in event of a disaster
    • Documented reports to ensure defined SLAs are met

    Managed Service Cyber Security Training

    • Fully managed phishing tests
    • Detailed reporting of results
    • Fully managed administration of custom online cyber security training

    VAULT400 Cloud Backup & DRaaS is an IBM Server Proven Solution.

    VAULT400.com/proposal for FREE analysis & proposal

    813.513.7402 | ContactUs@FocalPointSg.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: Automatic Ways to Assign Group Authorities to an Object Print PC Documents to iSeries Printers

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 15 Issue: 30

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Agilysys Blames Fiscal Q1 Sales Weakness on IBM ‘Proprietary Servers’
    • Everybody Loves SOA, Aberdeen Survey Says
    • Bang for the Buck: Baby i5 Servers Versus Windows and Linux Boxes
    • IT Shops Expect iSCSI and Fibre Channel to Co-Exist
    • IBM Creates a Performance-Based Pricing Scheme for Software
    • Lawson Reports Preliminary Q4 Results, Loses CFO, and Buys CAS
    • New Vendors Join SOA Collaboration Group
    • Logility’s Sales Rocket Skyward in Fiscal Q4
    • As I See It: Productivity and Relationship
    • The Blogosphere Says the IRS Uses the iSeries to Manage Bill Gates’ Personal Taxes

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • IBM i Has a Future ‘If Kept Up To Date,’ IDC Says
    • When You Need Us, We Are Ready To Do Grunt Work
    • Generative AI: Coming to an ERP Near You
    • Four Hundred Monitor, March 22
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 12
    • Unattended IBM i Operations Continue Upward Climb
    • VS Code Is The Full Stack IDE For IBM i
    • Domino Runs on IBM i 7.5, But HCL Still Working on Power10
    • Four Hundred Monitor, March 6
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 11

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2023 IT Jungle