• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Software Powerhouses Agree on SOA Standards Bodies

    March 26, 2007 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    In December 2005, seven software companies got together in an unnamed group to pitch the idea of creating some standards to govern the way applications written to a service oriented architecture should be implemented; last July, the group expanded its membership to 17 companies–many of the major software players, minus Microsoft and Sun Microsystems. And last week, the SOA group, now with Sun as a member, but still not Microsoft, decided to submit its proposed Service Component Architecture (SCA) and Service Data Objects (SDO) standards to the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, or OASIS.

    The SOA standards advocates behind this effort include BEA Systems, Cape Clear, IBM, Interface21, IONA, Oracle, Primeton Technologies, Progress Software, Red Hat, Rogue Wave Software, SAP, Siemens, Software AG, Sun Microsystems, Sybase, TIBCO Software, and Xcalia.

    This may not be a very exiting announcement in terms of feeds and speeds, but submitting SCA and SDO to a neutral standards body is going to eventually make it possible for SOA standards to evolve in a non-contentious fashion–something that end user companies really want.

    SCA and SDO are actually collections of language-neutral standards that describe how an SOA service is created, how multiple services are assembled into an application, and how data is moved among services as they provide a layer of abstraction to link into myriad APIs in operating systems, databases, middleware, and application software. OASIS is getting control of SCA, which as the name suggests, is focused on how services are architected into applications, while OASIS is only getting a hold of the SDO pieces that relate to programming languages other than Java. To make Sun happy, the SDO-Java work will be steered by the Java Community Process, the meritocracy created by Sun for its Java licensees to control the development of the Java programming language and related runtimes and tools.

    To find out more about the SCA and SDO specifications, go to the Open Service Oriented Architecture site. SCA specifications have been created for Java, Spring, BPEL, and C++ languages, with additional standards for service assembly, policies, and binding. SDO specifications have been created for Java and C++, and there are draft specifications under review for C and COBOL. No one has said bupkus about RPG. Uh, IBM. Now might be a good time to get some specs together for RPG.

    RELATED STORIES

    New Vendors Join SOA Collaboration Group

    Major IT Firms Join to Standardize SOA



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 16, Number 12 -- March 26, 2007

    Sponsored by
    JAMS Software

    One Scheduler. IBM i, Windows, Linux, and More.

    IBM i teams trust JAMS to schedule and orchestrate jobs across every platform in their environment. Centralized visibility, cross-platform dependency management, and alerts that reach the right person before the business feels it.

    Fewer than 5% of IBM i shops run IBM i only. The rest are managing cross-platform dependencies — often without a clear picture of how they connect. JAMS draws that map, enforces those dependencies automatically, and gives your team a single place to monitor, manage, and recover when something goes wrong.

    If you are running hundreds of CL scripts and custom RPG processes, bring them as-is. JAMS runs them exactly as they do today — except now they are visible, monitored, and part of an orchestrated workflow instead of scattered across folders only one person knows about.

    No consumption-based pricing. No surprise bills when your workload spikes. You pay based on how many machines JAMS talks to — that’s it.

    Learn More → https://jamsscheduler.com/lp/ibm-i

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Black Market for ID Theft Has Strong U.S. Ties, Symantec Finds Magic Software Hires a New Chief Executive

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 16 Issue: 12

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Financial Services Industry Spent the Most on Servers in 2006, Says Gartner
    • Fortran Creator, John Backus, Dies at 82
    • Magic Software Hires a New Chief Executive
    • Software Powerhouses Agree on SOA Standards Bodies
    • Black Market for ID Theft Has Strong U.S. Ties, Symantec Finds
    • Financial Services Industry Spent the Most on Servers in 2006, Says Gartner
    • As I See It: Workplace Heaven
    • IDC Chops Server Forecasts Thanks to Virtualization, Multicore Chips
    • Oracle Sues SAP Over ‘Corporate Theft on a Grand Scale’
    • IBM to Meet Upset WDSc Shops Half-Way on Features?

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • More Power Systems Price Hikes, This Time They Are “Directional”
    • AI Is Not Just For Developers, It Is For Everyone At Your Company
    • Guru: Finding Data In The Forest – Exploring Three-Part Naming In SQL
    • Former IBMer’s New Book Puts The Midrange In The Spotlight
    • Have You Tried To Buy A Server Lately?
    • GenAI Is The Death Of Deterministic Project Budgeting
    • PTC Adds Support For VS Code With Implementer 12.7
    • Guru: Single Threading A Program Execution
    • As I See It: Push Back
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 21

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle