• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Reader Feedback: Run Collection Services Before You Upgrade

    February 4, 2008 Hey, TPM

    Good article and guidance regarding moving to V6R1. [Editor’s Note: The reader is referring to Bracing for i5/OS V6R1 and the Winding Down of V5, from the January 14 issue of The Four Hundred.]

    If you get the opportunity, remind folks to run the system’s Collection Services before moving to capture a set of baseline performance data. Once they move the data, if not needed, it can be erased. If they move and have some performance issues, they have a base to compare to. Otherwise, it’s really a challenge for the performance analyst to make good decisions as to what might be causing a problem.

    –Rick

    Hi, Rick:

    Thanks for the tip. Any chance you want to write some performance tuning articles for us for Four Hundred Guru?

    –TPM

    Not real sure about writing. I’ve cut back a lot on consulting; one reason being that there’s a lot of “new” stuff the last two to three years that I’m just not up to date on at all.

    Also, it seems that the articles I’ve done the last few years in iSeries News have gotten very little, if any, feedback. There seems to be an attitude that more hardware solves all problems, so it’s not necessary to understand how to “tune” things.

    I’d rather do some advanced training on Job Watcher and PEX analysis, but haven’t been successful in convincing others to include some performance sections in the classes they currently teach. Last winter, I did an IBM Redbook on PEX Statistics, which I believe is one of the best tools the AS/400 (and its predecessors and successors) ever had, along with the current iDoctor and Job Watcher combination. But once again, very little feedback either for or against. Sort of like Ron Paul’s presidential try.

    On the other hand, I still enjoy doing performance analysis, but being a Minnesota golfer, only in the off season.

    Thanks, take care.

    –Rick

    Maybe if the performance tools showed you how much money you didn’t have to spend by using them or how many barrels of oil that extra hardware really costs–with the fully burdened environmental and military-industrial-Congressional complex impact added in as well as manufacturing costs and power and cooling costs over a three-year span–people would work a lot harder on tuning software and buy a lot less hardware. Making something a commodity is not necessarily an improvement in the quality of life, is it?

    I am not advocating for the days of core memory. I am just saying, scarcity makes people clever and sometimes makes things run more efficiently, not less so.

    Thanks again,

    –TPM

    RELATED STORIES

    i5/OS V6R1 Announced Today, Ships in March

    Some Info on i5/OS V6R1 and V6R2 Support

    Bracing for i5/OS V6R1 and the Winding Down of V5

    IBM Previews i5/OS V6R1, Due in 2008



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 5 -- February 4, 2008

    Sponsored by
    GiAPA – The IBM i Developer’s Best Friend

    Want to Speed Up Your IBM i Applications?

    GiAPA pinpoints where performance can be optimized – down to program statements.

    First performance tips free!

    Highlights from www.GiAPA.com:

    • Automatic analysis of all applications
    • Total potential time savings shown
    • Finds optimizations – even in applications believed to run OK
    • Uses <0.1% CPU
    • Free Trial

    2-minute Intro Video    

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    i5/OS V5R3 Support Ends in April 2009 IBM Brings SAN Performance to Parity with Internal Arrays

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 5

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Entry System p Servers Get Power6 Chips, System i Boxes Await
    • The Power6 Server Ramp: Better Than Expected
    • IBM Takes System i Disk Clustering Up a Notch with HASM
    • The X Factor: Survive, Adapt, Repeat
    • i5/OS V5R3 Support Ends in April 2009
    • Reader Feedback: Run Collection Services Before You Upgrade
    • IBM Brings SAN Performance to Parity with Internal Arrays
    • Let’s Take a Closer Look at JS22 Blade Servers Running i5OS V6R1
    • Alternate Operating System Support Improved with i5/OS V6R1
    • i5/OS V6R1 and Its Java Enhancements

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Spring IBM i Tech Refreshes Will Come A Bit Later This Year
    • You Are Much More Than Power Systems, And So Are We
    • Startup Seeks The “Golden Path” for IBM i Modernization
    • What Can IBM Do To Make The Future Power S1112 Mini System Compelling?
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 15
    • Bob 1.0 Users Bugged By Lack Of One Feature
    • Here Come The AI-Based Code Modernization Offerings
    • Guru: Cohesion First – What A Procedure Should Be Responsible For
    • IBM Offers Trade-Ins On Storage To Grease The Upgrade Skids
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 14

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle