• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • IBM Temporarily Banned from U.S. Government Deals

    April 7, 2008 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Given the shaky state of the economy in the United States and IBM‘s dependence on services contracts and sales to the Federal government, any kind of interruption on the flow of deals is something that Big Blue wants to avoid. But for a couple of days last week, IBM was barred from bidding on contracts with Uncle Sam.

    According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, which was echoed later by a press release put out by IBM and elaborated on not at all by a separate statement that the company sent to its PartnerWorld partners, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia last Monday served IBM’s corporate officers and certain (and unspecified) employees with grand jury subpoenas requesting testimony and documents regarding interactions between employees of the Environmental Protection Agency and IBM’s employees. Apparently, according to the report in the Journal, IBM was bidding on an IT contract for the EPA and someone somewhere became available that IBM had access to sensitive information relating to an $80 million IT systems modernization contract that IBM bid on in March 2006. The nature of that information, and whether or not it led to IBM winning the deal, is not clear.

    On Monday, IBM announced that in the prior week, Uncle Sam barred IBM from bidding on new government contracts and by Friday, nine days later, after a preliminary investigation, the government said IBM could start bidding again. The EPA is still investigating if IBM broke its procurement rules and the U.S. Attorney’s Office is also still actively investigating whatever happened.

    Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice sued Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems, and Accenture for making kickbacks to other tech firms they partnered with as they sold IT solutions to the federal government in the 1990s and 2000s.



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 14 -- April 7, 2008

    Sponsored by
    FalconStor

    Simplify Secure Offsite Data Protection for IBM Power with FalconStor Habanero™

    IBM i teams are under growing pressure to ensure data is protected, recoverable, and compliant—without adding complexity or disrupting stable environments.

    FalconStor Habanero™ provides secure, fully managed offsite data protection purpose-built for IBM Power. It integrates directly with existing IBM i backup tools and processes, enabling reliable offsite copies without new infrastructure, workflow changes, or added operational overhead.

    By delivering and managing the service end-to-end, FalconStor helps organizations strengthen cyber resilience, improve disaster recovery readiness, and meet compliance requirements with confidence. Offsite copies are securely maintained and available when needed, supporting recovery, audits, and business continuity.

    FalconStor Habanero offers a straightforward way to modernize offsite data protection for IBM i: focused on simplicity, reliability, and resilience.

    Learn More

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    You Win: IBM Makes Power Blade Software Tiers Make Sense Linden Lab, IBM to Take Virtual Worlds Corporate and Private

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 14

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • It’s Official: Now We’re Power Systems and i for Business
    • Power6 Chips Get i Support in New Entry and Blade Machines
    • We’re Listening About and Acting For the i Platform, Says IBM
    • Mad Dog 21/21: Bears’ Turns
    • Goodbye, AS/400, Old Friend
    • Most CIOs Say 2008 IT Budgets Are Stable, So Far
    • COMMON Prepares for the Power Systems Evolution
    • You Win: IBM Makes Power Blade Software Tiers Make Sense
    • IBM Temporarily Banned from U.S. Government Deals
    • Linden Lab, IBM to Take Virtual Worlds Corporate and Private

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Inside The Encryption Key Management Changes In IBM i 7.6
    • FalconStor Moved To The Blue Lagoon, And Is Poised For Growth Because Of It
    • Guru: Claude’s SQL Tip
    • Astera Makes Extracting Legacy Report Data an AI Specialty
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 27
    • Welcoming The New IBM i Chief Architect And Other New Top Brass
    • A Deep Dive Into That Power S1112 Entry Power11 Server
    • Guru: Beyond Three-Part Naming – Running SQL Across Remote IBM i Systems
    • How IBM Bolstered IBM i Resilience In The Summer Tech Refreshes
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 26

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle