• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • SPEC Members Start on Energy Benchmark for Web Servers

    June 16, 2008 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    There’s an old adage: You can’t manage what you don’t measure. As most data center managers and server and storage arrays makers have been well aware of for years, we have some pretty serious power and cooling issues affecting IT operations. (As I write this, the 95-degree temperatures in New York City have me worrying about keeping IT Jungle’s Linux-Windows cluster cool once again drives the point on home.) While we have many different benchmarks for determining performance of computers, there are few workloads that have been tweaked to provide a standard means of gauging power draw while benchmarks are running.

    This is a problem, and the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation, one of the key providers of benchmarks used by the industry, says that it is now working on its second power-related benchmark test, this time around, one that measure the power efficiency of Web serving.

    “Power used by data centers is expected to double in the next five years and Web servers will likely play a prominent role in that growth,” explains Rema Hariharan, the chairman of the SPECweb committee that is putting together the new test and a former technical staff member of AT&T, a performance engineer at Sun Microsystems, and now hailing from Advanced Micro Devices. “A SPEC benchmark could help abate this trend and establish more power-efficient practices.”

    In January, as we previously reported, SPEC put out its first benchmark that gauges the performance and power consumption of servers, called SPECpower_ssj2008. While the code used in this test is different from others, it beats some resemblance to the SPECjbb2005 Java server benchmark test. Importantly, the SPECpower_ssj2008 test not only gives us a standardized test to measure power consumption at various performance levels, but sets out a methodology by which other benchmark tests can be tweaked to give them a consistent set of power consumption metrics. This will probably guide how the SPECweb committee develops a power-sensitive and power-measuring version of the SPECweb2005 test.

    AMD, Fujitsu-Siemens, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, and Sun are all on the SPECweb committee that is coming up with the Web power rating benchmark, and they are all soliciting input from corporations, universities, vendors, and any other interested parties. The new SPECweb power test is expected to be launched at the end of 2008 or in early 2008.

    SPEC has also announced that it has updated the SPEC CPU2006 suite of integer and floating point performance tests, which are perhaps the best known of the SPEC family of benchmarks. With CPU2006 V1.1, SPEC has implemented more portable code, which will allow the benchmark test to be moved from machine to machine in a family of products and across families of compatible products without having to recompile the benchmark code in each individual machine. The new suite also is easier to set up and run on larger systems, particularly those with lots of processors and cores. (The benchmark has to reach a steady state of operation before the test results can be gathered from the system, and this process of ramping up the workload used to take a lot more time.) Companies using the V1.1 code to test their boxes can compare them to prior V1.0 release results; the changes in the code are about usability of the test code but have no effect on performance results, according to SPEC.

    RELATED STORIES

    Servers Get Their First Power and Performance Benchmark

    SPEC Launches Java Messaging Benchmark

    EPA Says American Data Centers Can Cut Power Use Dramatically

    SPEC Introduces MPI Supercomputer Benchmark

    Transaction Processing Council Launches TPC-E Benchmark

    Uncle Sam Pushes Energy Star Ratings for Servers



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 24 -- June 16, 2008

    Sponsored by
    JAMS Software

    One Scheduler. IBM i, Windows, Linux, and More.

    IBM i teams trust JAMS to schedule and orchestrate jobs across every platform in their environment. Centralized visibility, cross-platform dependency management, and alerts that reach the right person before the business feels it.

    Fewer than 5% of IBM i shops run IBM i only. The rest are managing cross-platform dependencies — often without a clear picture of how they connect. JAMS draws that map, enforces those dependencies automatically, and gives your team a single place to monitor, manage, and recover when something goes wrong.

    If you are running hundreds of CL scripts and custom RPG processes, bring them as-is. JAMS runs them exactly as they do today — except now they are visible, monitored, and part of an orchestrated workflow instead of scattered across folders only one person knows about.

    No consumption-based pricing. No surprise bills when your workload spikes. You pay based on how many machines JAMS talks to — that’s it.

    Learn More → https://jamsscheduler.com/lp/ibm-i

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    There’s Still Money in Operating Systems, But Disruptions Loom Enterprises Are Judged by the Measure of IT Performance

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 24

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Happy 20th Birthday, AS/400!
    • The Power 595 Takes the Top TPC-C Benchmark Ranking
    • The World Can’t Get Enough Disk Array Capacity
    • Mad Dog 21/21: iPhone Home
    • IBM Is Enjoying the Role of Green Giant
    • Reader Feedback on Forget About Platforms, Let’s Talk About Jobs
    • Another i5/OS-i Security Vulnerability Surfaces
    • There’s Still Money in Operating Systems, But Disruptions Loom
    • SPEC Members Start on Energy Benchmark for Web Servers
    • Enterprises Are Judged by the Measure of IT Performance

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Inside The Encryption Key Management Changes In IBM i 7.6
    • FalconStor Moved To The Blue Lagoon, And Is Poised For Growth Because Of It
    • Guru: Claude’s SQL Tip
    • Astera Makes Extracting Legacy Report Data an AI Specialty
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 27
    • Welcoming The New IBM i Chief Architect And Other New Top Brass
    • A Deep Dive Into That Power S1112 Entry Power11 Server
    • Guru: Beyond Three-Part Naming – Running SQL Across Remote IBM i Systems
    • How IBM Bolstered IBM i Resilience In The Summer Tech Refreshes
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 26

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle