• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Do Your File Specifications Lie?

    January 21, 2009 Ted Holt

    An old joke says, “How do you know a salesman (or politician) is lying to you?” The answer: “His lips are moving.” All joking aside, your RPG IV F specs can lie to you, and it’s not obvious when they do. This is not a serious problem, but I’ve run across it on occasion and want to be sure others are aware of it.

    Let’s say the following program is running:

    H dftactgrp(*no) actgrp('QILE')
    Fcustcdt   uf   e             disk
    Ferd01p    o    e             printer
     /free
         *inlr = *on;
         dow '1';
            read cusrec;
            if %eof();  
                leave;
            endif;
            write erd01p1;
         enddo;
         return;
    

    This is a simple program, right? Read a record, write a record.

    Someone else comes along and starts up this program while the first program is running.

    pgm
    
    alcobj obj((custcdt *file *exclrd)) wait(0)
    call   SomePgm /* that uses custcdt */
    dlcobj obj((custcdt *file *exclrd))
    
    endpgm
    

    The second user is greeted with message CPF1002 (Cannot allocate object CUSTCDT) because the second program thinks the first program is updating file CUSTCDT. The F spec in the first program lied, therefore the second program won’t run.

    Maybe the first program used to update CUSTCDT, but someone since removed the update operation and failed to change the F spec. Here’s the corrected F spec, with the file designated as input only rather than updatable.

    Fcustcdt   if   e             disk
    

    Here’s another variation of the same program, with yet another lying F spec.

    H dftactgrp(*no) actgrp('QILE')
    Fcustcdt   if   e             disk
    Fsalesrep  if   e           k disk
    Ferd01p    o    e             printer
     /free
         *inlr = *on;
         dow '1';
            read cusrec;
            if %eof();  
                leave;
            endif;
            write erd01p1;
         enddo;
         return;
    

    The second F spec claims that this program uses the sales representative file, but that’s not true. The compiler generates warning message RNF7066 (Record-Format REP not used for input or output), but that warning message is unreliable. If you issue native I/O operations, such as CHAIN or READ, to a file name rather than its record format name(s), the compiler will generate RNF7066. In other words, RNF7066 is not a trustworthy indicator that the file is not used in the program. For this reason alone, I use record format names, rather than file names, in calculations when possible.

    By the way, the RPG III compiler will generate hard errors for these situations, but I’m not suggesting you use RPG III.

    The consequences of lying F specs may be more nuisance than catastrophe, but here are a few of the results that I have seen.

    1. As illustrated above, a program might not run because of another program’s lying F spec.
    2. Performance is affected, as programs open and close files they don’t use.
    3. Documentation packages may erroneously report that a file is being used, leading to wasted developer time when that file is modified.
    4. Based on their reading of source code, developers may make erroneous decisions or infer erroneous behavior of job streams.



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    New Generation Software

    “Fixing Your Data Supply Chain”

    FREE Webinar

    You’ve optimized your business processes, products and services, but is there still a logistics gap between your data and your managers and analysts?

    See how NGS-IQ simplifies query, reporting, data visualization, and analytics tasks. Enjoy Microsoft 365 integration, multidimensional modeling, built-in email, and FTP – with IBM i security and performance.

    October 23, 2025, 11am Pacific/2pm Eastern

    RSVP: https://ngsi.news/chain

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Sponsored Links

    ARCAD Software:  FREE Webinar, ITIL Best Practices with Philippe Magne, January 28
    COMMON:  Join us at the 2009 annual meeting and expo, April 26-30, Reno, Nevada
    System i Developer:  RPG & DB2 Summit in Orlando, April 15-17 for 3 days of serious training

    IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

    Easy Steps to Internet Programming for AS/400, iSeries, and System i: List Price, $49.95
    Getting Started with PHP for i5/OS: List Price, $59.95
    The System i RPG & RPG IV Tutorial and Lab Exercises: List Price, $59.95
    The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
    The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
    The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
    The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
    The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
    The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
    Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
    iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
    Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
    Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
    Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
    WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
    Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
    The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
    Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95

    Ricoh Launches New Color MFP i Roadmaps: Here Be Dragons

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 9, Number 3 -- January 21, 2009
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Help/Systems
WorksRight Software
System i Developer

Table of Contents

  • Redundant Join Criteria: Good or Bad Idea?
  • Do Your File Specifications Lie?
  • Trouble-Shooting WebSM to HMC Connectivity Problems

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Positive News From The Kyndryl Mainframe Modernization Report
  • NAViGATE, inPower 2025 On Tap for September 2025
  • Guru: WCA4i And Granite – Because You’ve Got Bigger Things To Build
  • As I See It: Digital Coup
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 37
  • AI Is Coming for ERP. How Will IBM i Respond?
  • The Power And Storage Price Wiggling Continues – Again
  • LaserVault Adds Multi-Path Support To ViTL
  • As I See It: Spacing Out
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Numbers 34, 35, And 36

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle