• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Help Wanted: AS/400 Advocate

    June 22, 2009 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    The iManifest coming out of a group of business partners is Japan, which you can read about elsewhere in this edition of The Four Hundred, has stirred up a lot of thought and talk in the AS/400 market (yes, I said it that way on purpose) concerning who is to be responsible for the safeguarding of the present and the future of the AS/400 platform. This is all healthy and good, but it doesn’t solve the central problem the AS/400 faces: It has no advocate inside of IBM.

    As we know all too well, IBM has made many, many changes in the AS/400 platform over the years to suit its needs, much as it did when it created the AS/400 in the first place, merging two similar but incompatible minicomputer lines on a single hardware and software platform in such a way that the vast majority of the base (System/36 customers) were highly displeased with the machine (which resembled a System/38 more than anything else).

    It has been particularly tough on the AS/400, both inside of IBM and in customer data centers and the market large, in recent years, but if you want to be honest, the troubles really began a long time ago. I think the last time the AS/400 was truly an AS/400 as we knew and loved it was with the 1995 launch of the original PowerPC-based AS/400 lineup. That was an all-Rochester product line, well engineered and IBM’s first 64-bit operating system running on 64-bit iron. And it was also pretty much the last time the Rochester team had its own iron and had full authority to create a system that suited its customers needs, IBM Corporate be damned. And, not surprisingly, it was a hugely successful product line, offering customers a big increase in performance (like twice as much) for the same money.

    The slide to the homogenized Power Systems began shortly after this, and mainly because the RS/6000 team in Austin messed up its 64-bit implementation of the Power processor. But somehow–and I don’t work at IBM, so I don’t know how–after the 1997 launch of the “Raven” Northstar PowerPC servers, Austin took over Power server designs and the input of people like Frank Soltis, the chief architect of the System/38 and AS/400, didn’t seem to get much of a hearing. IBM started homogenizing long before the “Mach II” eServer rebranding that gave us the iSeries, pSeries, xSeries, and zSeries lines. AS/400 shops hated this campaign because IBM stopped saying why you needed an AS/400 and stopped marketing the AS/400 at all, pretty much. When the downturn in IT spending came in late 2000, IBM was best positioned to storm the market with a converged Power4 “Regatta” server line, but the pricing was set to screw iSeries shops to extract profits out of them so IBM could afford to buy market share with its pSeries line. More than one AS/400 general manager has told me that they wanted to do some sort of violence to me (half-joking, of course), but when I think about what these short-term decisions by IBM’s bigwigs did to my life and your lives, it is hard not to have violent thoughts myself.

    I have watched so many AS/400 general managers come and go, key advocates of the platform retire or die, in the past several years that it can be depressing. You know this as well as I do. There hasn’t actually been an AS/400 Division (well, a System i division) for two years now, and executive responsibility for the line is spread across the Power Systems division and the Business Systems division. One does system development (Power Systems) and some marketing and the other does marketing and some system development (Smart Cube). But they have different missions, different employees, and different agendas. It is like IBM wanted to merge its server lines, but then couldn’t stand it and then ripped the System x and System i lines in half and smashed bits of them together.

    So who speaks for the AS/400? Who defends it? Who has power to say: “No. Not with my platform you don’t, mister.”

    COMMON, COMMON Europe, and a bunch of regional user groups do the best that grassroots organizations can. But they are as beholden to IBM’s assistance as they are independent from Big Blue. They have to criticize carefully and tread lightly to secure their own existence. Ditto for reseller and independent software vendors. The master resellers, Arrow Electronics and Avnet do the best that they can for themselves and their reseller partners, but their short-term, quarter-to-quarter interests have typically been considered and adopted by IBM ahead of what Big Blue has needed to do to remain competitive. IBM and resellers are concerned with maximizing profits over the short term, while Microsoft and its X64 server partners have been interested only in world domination and making profits through volume server sales. It takes no genius to see which strategy rules the midrange.

    Nothing is focusing the power of the customers, the resellers, and the ISVs in such a way that IBM can be compelled to think in a different way, to restore the AS/400 to its rightful dignity. That, as far as I can tell, is the central problem with the AS/400, and has been for nearly a decade. What we need now–what we have needed for so long–is an AS/400 advocate that is imbued with the power of the users and the channel and the software partners that counterbalances IBM’s ownership of the platform. IBM may control the roadmaps for the AS/400 platform, but good people of the midrange, you buy the boxes.

    So we need an advocate with power. Maybe it comes through a buyers co-operative, something like the AS/400 Large User Group, which I told you about in detail in January. (Well, as much detail as you can get out of the LUG.) The LUG is an aggregation of 112 of the biggest AS/400 shops in the world, and IBM hosts them in Rochester and listens to their needs. Why? Because money talks. And if you want the kind of power that the LUG wields, you need to bring the buying power and needs of 100,000 active i shops together and nail the Four Hundred Theses to the doors at IBM Somers and Armonk HQ.

    I hear Frank Soltis has some time on his hands these days. If Soltis doesn’t have an axe to grind, then he can borrow my black steel broadsword.

    RELATED STORIES

    AS/400: Still Kicking After 21 Years

    IBM i Manifest Takes Root in Japan

    IBM’s AS/400 20th Birthday Party Pictures

    IBM’s AS/400 20th Birthday Party Pictures

    The AS/400’s Grandfather Talks Past, Present, and Future

    Happy 20th Birthday, AS/400!

    The AS/400 at 19: Predicting the Future–Or Not

    Happy 18th Birthday, AS/400; Time to Leave the Nest

    The IBM Systems Agenda: iB(M)

    Happy 17th Birthday to the AS/400!

    The AS/400: 16 Years of Bending, Not Breaking



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 18, Number 24 -- June 22, 2009

    Sponsored by
    UCG Technologies

    CYBER-ATTACKS ON THE RISE. PROTECT WITH THE TRIPLE PLAY.

    COVID-19 has not only caused a global pandemic, but has sparked a “cyber pandemic” as well.

    “Cybersecurity experts predict that in 2021, there will be a cyber-attack incident every 11 seconds. This is nearly twice what it was in 2019 (every 19 seconds), and four times the rate five years ago (every 40 seconds in 2016). It is expected that cybercrime will cost the global economy $6.1 trillion annually, making it the third-largest economy in the world, right behind those of the United States and China.”1

    Protecting an organization’s data is not a single-faceted approach, and companies need to do everything they can to both proactively prevent an attempted attack and reactively respond to a successful attack.

    UCG Technologies’ VAULT400 subscription defends IBM i and Intel systems against cyber-attacks through comprehensive protection with the Triple Play Protection – Cloud Backup, DRaaS, & Enterprise Cybersecurity Training.

    Cyber-attacks become more sophisticated every day. The dramatic rise of the remote workforce has accelerated this trend as cyber criminals aggressively target company employees with online social engineering attacks. It is crucial that employees have proper training on what NOT to click on. Cyber threats and social engineering are constantly evolving and UCG’s Enterprise Cybersecurity Training (powered by KnowBe4) is designed to educate employees on the current cutting-edge cyber-attacks and how to reduce and eliminate them.

    A company is only as strong as its weakest link and prevention is just part of the story. Organizations need to have a quick response and actionable plan to implement should their data become compromised. This is the role of cloud backup and disaster-recovery-as-a-service (DRaaS).

    Data is a company’s most valuable asset. UCG’s VAULT400 Cloud Backup provides 256-bit encrypted backups to two (2) remote locations for safe retrieval should a cyber-attack occur. This is a necessary component of any protection strategy. Whether a single click on a malicious link brings down the Windows environment or an infected SQL server feeds the IBM i, once the data is compromised, there is no going back unless you have your data readily available.

    Recovery is not a trivial task, especially when you factor in the time sensitive nature of restoring from an active attack. This leads to the third play of the Triple Play Protection – DRaaS.  Companies have myriad concerns once an attack is realized and a managed service disaster recovery allows employees to keep focus on running the business in a crisis state.

    The combination of training employees with secure backup and disaster recovery offers companies the best chance at avoiding financial disruption in an age of stronger, more frequent cyber-attacks.

    Reach out to UCG Technologies to discuss your company’s security needs and develop a data protection plan that fits you best.

    ucgtechnologies.com/triple-play

     800.211.8798 | info@ucgtechnologies.com

     

    1. https://theconversation.com/cyberattacks-are-on-the-rise-amid-work-from-home-how-to-protect-your-business-151268

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: A Simple Save While Active Backup Program IBM to Offer Free EGL Tool for Web 2.0

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 18 Issue: 24

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • AS/400: Still Kicking After 21 Years
    • Power Systems i Weather Report: Partly Cloudy Soon
    • IBM i Manifest Takes Root in Japan
    • Help Wanted: AS/400 Advocate
    • COMMON Europe: Doing the Math on Top i Concerns
    • : A Community of Common Interest
    • IDC Forecasts Server Sales Declines Until 2011; Blame X64 Boxes
    • Big Blue Offers U.S. Companies U.S.-Only Support
    • IBM Office Suite Takes a Whack at Microsoft Licensing Albatross
    • Custom Tailored Solutions for the Crisis Prone

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Doing The Texas Two Step From Power9 To Power10
    • PHP’s Legacy Problem
    • Guru: For IBM i Newcomers, An Access Client Solutions Primer
    • IBM i 7.1 Extended Out To 2024 And Up To The IBM Cloud
    • Some Practical Advice On That HMC-Power9 Impedance Mismatch
    • IBM Extends Dynamic Capacity Pricing Scheme To Its Cloud
    • Here’s What You Should Do About The IBM i Skills Shortage
    • Matillion Founder Recounts Midrange Roots
    • Four Hundred Monitor, February 24
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 23, Number 8

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2021 IT Jungle

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.