• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Oracle Bad for Open Source, Survey Says

    March 7, 2011 Alex Woodie

    How bad is Oracle for open source software? According to the results of a survey released by EnterpriseDB last week, Java developers would rather see Larry Ellison in a dunk tank than Bill Gates, the former Microsoft CEO who crusaded against Linux. The company behind the open source PostgreSQL database also detected some bad karma emanating from Oracle’s handling of MySQL, which is something that IBM i professionals can relate to.

    The enticing specter of billionaire tech CEOs sitting in a dunk tank is the product of a non-scientific survey conducted by EnterpriseDB at the JavaOne conference held in September in San Francisco. Nearly 40 percent selected Ellison for the wet seat, compared to 26 percent for Apple CEO Steve Jobs, 25 percent for Gates, and 9 percent for former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.

    While all of those tech giants have been perceived to be unfriendly to Java at one point or another, Oracle, which obtained Java along with Solaris, the Sparc server business, and MySQL with the 2010 acquisition of Sun Microsystems, is considered the current bogeyman by Java supporters. Some 56 percent of the survey respondents said Oracle’s recent lawsuit against Google for copyright and patent infringement is “bad for Java.” Interestingly, 14 percent said the lawsuit would be a good thing for Java, while 30 percent said it would have no impact.

    When it comes to other open source projects like MySQL (Java is a pseudo open source project), 46 percent of respondents said projects like MySQL would “stagnate” under Oracle’s ownership, with an additional 19 percent saying open source would “die” under Oracle. About 35 percent said open source projects would thrive.

    If Oracle’s handling of MySQL running on IBM i is any indication, MySQL customers can expect the Redwood Shores, California-based company to make more unpopular decisions with the open source database. Indeed, more than 42 percent of the JavaOne survey respondents think Oracle will raise MySQL prices.

    IBM i customers running the MySQL database for their PHP apps would have welcomed a price increase compared to what they got–a notice late last year that Oracle would no longer be producing binaries for MySQL to run on the IBM i OS, and a cessation of technical support for the database-server combination. Oracle cited “low demand” as the reason for ending support for IBM i, despite reports from IBM executives and industry experts that uptake of the database was doing quite well on the platform.

    Some have speculated that the real reason Oracle dropped support for IBM i was simply to deal a blow to IBM, its longtime rival in the enterprise IT business. This speculation was fueled by another Oracle support decision regarding the “Blue Stack” of IBM middleware that is used by IBM i customers running the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne ERP software. Oracle also killed off the Blue Stack in late 2010. You just shouldn’t expect Oracle to do anything nice for IBM as it seeks to build a complete enterprise IT stack that’s under its complete control, industry insiders say.

    But it’s not just open source. Oracle appears more willing to use its considerable heft to get its way these days. It’s taken off the gloves with another rival, SAP, which ran the now-defunct TomorrowNow company that provided technical support and maintenance for Oracle ERP applications, including JD Edwards and PeopleSoft. A jury awarded Oracle $1.3 billion in damages, but SAP is appealing that decision.

    Oracle is also apparently playing hard ball with the third-party hardware support companies. According to accusations leveled last month by the Service Industry Association, Oracle is using anticompetitive practices to discourage third-party companies from servicing Sun servers and StorageTek storage products.

    SIA, which is based in San Diego, California, has filed complaints in all 50 states and Europe, alleging that Oracle’s policies “are the most onerous of all within the IT service and maintenance industry and are created solely to monopolize the Sun hardware maintenance business.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Oracle, SAP Still Going At It Over TomorrowNow

    Oracle Drops MySQL Support for IBM i

    Oracle’s Withdrawal of JDE ‘Blue Stack’ Raises Questions



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    PERFSCAN

    Revolutionary Performance Management Software

    At Greymine, we recognize there is a void in the IT world for a dedicated performance management company and also for a performance management tool that’s modern, easy to use, and doesn’t cost an arm and a leg. That’s why we created PERFSCAN.

    PERFSCAN is designed to make your job easier. With revolutionary technology, an easy-to-read report and graphics engine, and real time monitoring, tasks that used to take days can now take minutes. This means you will know your system better and will be able to provide better service to your customers.

    OUR FEATURES

    PERFSCAN is full of robust features that don’t require you to take a three-day class in order to use the product effectively.

    Customizable Performance Reporting

    Whether you are troubleshooting a major system problem or simply creating a monthly report, PERFSCAN lets you select any combination of desired performance metrics (CPU, Disk, and Memory).

    User Defined Performance Guidelines

    No matter if you are a managed service provider managing complex systems in the cloud or a customer analyzing your on-premises solution, PERFSCAN gives you the flexibility to define all mission critical guidelines how they need to be.

    Understanding The Impact Of Change

    Tired of all the finger pointing when performance is suffering? PERFSCAN’s innovative What’s Changed and Period vs. Period analysis creates a culture of proof by correlating known environmental changes with system performance metrics.

    Comprehensive Executive Summary

    Creating performance graphs is easy. Understanding what they mean is another thing. With one mouse click, PERFSCAN includes an easy-to-understand executive summary for each core metric analyzed.

    Combined Real-Time Monitor And Performance Analysis Tool

    With PERFSCAN’s combined built in enterprise real-time monitor and historical performance analysis capability, you will always know how your mission-critical systems are performing.

    Cloud Performance Reporting Is Easy

    Managing performance for production systems in the cloud can be a black hole to many system administrators. The good news is PERFSCAN analyzes all core metrics regardless of the location. That’s why MSPs and customers love PERFSCAN.

    Detailed Job Analysis

    PERFSCAN shows detailed top job analysis for any desired period. All metrics are displayed in two ways: Traditional Report and Percentage Breakdown Pie Chart. This toggle capability instantly shows the jobs using the most system resources.

    Save Report Capability

    Your boss lost the report you gave to him on Friday. Now what do you do? With PERFSCAN’s save report capability, any report can be retrieved in a matter of seconds.

    Professional PDF Reporting With Branding

    Creating professional looking reports for your customers has never been easier with PERFSCAN. Branding for our partners and service provider customers is easy with PERFSCAN.

    Check it out at perfscan.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    BIRT Makes Open Source Waves in BI World Customer Service is Serious Business for IBM i Software Vendors

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 20, Number 9 -- March 7, 2011
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

BCD
PowerTech
Maxava
New Generation Software
WorksRight Software

Table of Contents

  • Some Insight Into the iASP and ISV Issue
  • Global Financing Offers Power5/5+ Takeouts to Power6/6+ Buyers
  • IBM Cuts 600 Workers; Corporate Citizenship Questioned
  • As I See It: I Think Therefore I Lie
  • Servers in the Others Category Do Well in Q4
  • US Adds Jobs in February, and at IT Companies, Too
  • IBM Kills Off a Bunch of Power Trade-In Deals
  • Plug Gets Pulled on System i 570 and 595 CPU Card Sales
  • Oracle Bad for Open Source, Survey Says
  • Data Centers Love Flash Storage

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • IBM i Delivers Sizable Benefits, Forrester Consulting Reports
  • SBOMs Will Come to IBM i, Eventually
  • IBM i Backup Provider Storagepipe Snapped Up By Thrive
  • Four Hundred Monitor, June 7
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 23
  • Power10 Boosts NVM-Express Flash Performance
  • Fortra Completes Postmortem Of GoAnywhere Vulnerability
  • Guru: Binding Directory Entries
  • How Does Your Infrastructure Spending Stack Up To The World?
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 22

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2023 IT Jungle