• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Forcing Keyword Parameters

    June 22, 2011 Ted Holt

    Programming languages use two conventions for passing arguments (commonly referred to as parameters) to a called routine. Some languages use positional parameters. That is, the parameters must be passed to the routine in a certain order. The other (and less error-prone) method is to password parameters in keyword format. IBM i allows you to force callers to use keyword format–to a point–when they use your CL commands. Here’s how.

    But first, let’s review the two major problems inherent in positional parameters. First, it is easy to get a parameter value into the wrong position. Take the following OCL command for example.

    LIBRLIBR HISLIB,HERLIB,,REPLACE,,REPLACE
    

    OCL uses commas to separate positional parameters. Adjacent commas mean that you are not passing a value for a parameter. If you omit one of the commas or add an extra comma, the system will not pass the correct values to the parameters of the LIBRLIBR routine.

    The second problem is that the meaning of each parameter is not obvious. Two parameters have the value REPLACE. What does each REPLACE mean in this context?

    In addition to OCL, other languages that use positional notation are the CALLP opcode in RPG and Unix (and Unix-like) shells, including Qshell.

    Keyword parameters do not have these problems because the order in which the parameters are coded does not matter, and each parameter’s function is documented by its keyword. Look at the following CL command.

    CPYSRCF FROMFILE(HISLIB/QRPGLESRC)
            TOFILE(HERLIB/QRPGLESRC)
            FROMMBR(REPLACE)
            MBROPT(*REPLACE)
    

    Is the meaning of any parameter in doubt?

    When you create a CL command of your own, give some thought to whether or not you want to force callers to enter keywords. The only advantage (of which I’m aware) of allowing users to enter parameters positionally is that the source code is sometimes cleaner and easier to read. Compare the following equivalent CL commands:

    IF (&OPTION *EQ 'W') DO
    
    IF COND(&OPTION *EQ '1') THEN(DO)
    

    Both are legible, but I prefer the first one. The second one is too cluttered for my taste. But the IF command only has two parameters. If there were, say, a half dozen or more, the absence of keywords would decrease readability.

    To force users to enter parameters in keyword format, use the MAXPOS parameter of the Create Command (CRTCMD) command.

    CRTCMD CMD(MYLIB/DOIT)
           PGM(*LIBL/DOITC)
           SRCFILE(MYLIB/QCMDSRC)
           SRCMBR(DOITX)
           <b>MAXPOS(1)<b>
    

    The help text for MAXPOS appears to me to be in error. It reads that the MAXPOS value must be greater than the number of required parameters, but my experience is that the MAXPOS value must be greater than <b>or equal to</b> the number of required parameters.

    And that brings up one little feature of which I am not fond. The preceding paragraph implies that you cannot force required parameters to be entered in keyword format. That is true, and I don’t like it, but nobody asked my opinion.

    If a caller passes too many parameters positionally, the system responds with two error messages: CPD0065 (Number of positional parameters exceeds limit of 1); and CPF0001 (Error found on DOIT command).

    For more information about positional and keyword formats, follow this link to IBM’s website.



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    DRV Tech

    Get More Out of Your IBM i

    With soaring costs, operational data is more critical than ever. IBM shops need faster, easier ways to distribute IBM applications-based data to users more efficiently, no matter where they are.

    The Problem:

    For Users, IBM Data Can Be Difficult to Get To

    IBM Applications generate reports as spooled files, originally designed to be printed. Often those reports are packed together with so much data it makes them difficult to read. Add to that hardcopy is a pain to distribute. User-friendly formats like Excel and PDF are better, offering sorting, searching, and easy portability but getting IBM reports into these formats can be tricky without the right tools.

    The Solution:

    IBM i Reports can easily be converted to easy to read and share formats like Excel and PDF and Delivered by Email

    Converting IBM i, iSeries, and AS400 reports into Excel and PDF is now a lot easier with SpoolFlex software by DRV Tech.  If you or your users are still doing this manually, think how much time is wasted dragging and reformatting to make a report readable. How much time would be saved if they were automatically formatted correctly and delivered to one or multiple recipients.

    SpoolFlex converts spooled files to Excel and PDF, automatically emailing them, and saving copies to network shared folders. SpoolFlex converts complex reports to Excel, removing unwanted headers, splitting large reports out for individual recipients, and delivering to users whether they are at the office or working from home.

    Watch our 2-minute video and see DRV’s powerful SpoolFlex software can solve your file conversion challenges.

    Watch Video

    DRV Tech

    www.drvtech.com

    866.378.3366

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Sponsored Links

    VAULT400:  Stuck in the 70's with Tape Backup? Get modern, secure back-up and DR
    Enforcive:  Enterprise security for the IBM i. Formerly Bsafe Information Systems
    SEQUEL Software:  FREE White Paper: The Race To Access Enterprise Data

    IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

    BACK IN STOCK: Easy Steps to Internet Programming for System i: List Price, $49.95

    The iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $49.95
    The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59
    The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59
    The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39
    Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49
    Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49
    The All-Everything Operating System: List Price, $35
    The Best Joomla! Tutorial Ever!: List Price, $19.95

    Education Matching Innovation: OCEAN Tech Conference Building a Legacy

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 11, Number 19 -- June 22, 2011
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

SEQUEL Software
ProData Computer Services
WorksRight Software

Table of Contents

  • SQL Implicit Cast of Character Strings and Numeric Values
  • Forcing Keyword Parameters
  • Admin Alert: Things to Think About in a Power i Development Environment

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • The Power11 Transistor Count Discrepancies Explained – Sort Of
  • Is Your IBM i HA/DR Actually Tested – Or Just Installed?
  • Big Blue Delivers IBM i Customer Requests In ACS Update
  • New DbToo SDK Hooks RPG And Db2 For i To External Services
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 33
  • Tool Aims To Streamline Git Integration For Old School IBM i Devs
  • IBM To Add Full System Replication And FlashCopy To PowerHA
  • Guru: Decoding Base64 ASCII
  • The Price Tweaking Continues For Power Systems
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Numbers 31 And 32

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle