• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Oracle Slapped Over Anti-Power Advertising Campaigns

    August 6, 2012 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Larry Ellison, co-founder and CEO of Oracle, has never been shy and he likes to compete. The company also likes to keep its marketing messages as simple as they are aggressive, and contrary to the do-nothing marketing approach by IBM, Oracle has something to prove since it acquired Sun Microsystems more than two years ago. Still, sometimes its claims about how it is better than one competitor or the other cross the line.

    Twice in the past year, in fact, according to rulings from the Better Business Bureau‘s National Advertising Division, the advertising part of the North America organization business practices watchdog.

    Back in April, the NAD reacted to a challenge from IBM about an Oracle advertisement from last fall that claimed the Sparc SuperCluster T4-4 clustered system “runs Oracle and Java twice as fast as IBM’s fastest computer,” which the advertising identifies as the IBM “P795” server, adding that the Sparc SuperCluster T4-4 cost $1.2 million, while IBM’s Power 795, as the machine is actually called, costs $4.5 million. This ad ran on the front page of the Wall Street Journal as well as a full fold-out page in the interior of the paper. I never saw the ad myself, but I certainly saw and reported on the performance claims Oracle made for the machine.

    In his presentation, Ellison called the Power 795 “one big, expensive, single point of failure,” which is funny, but he did not get into how the comparison between a Power 795 backed by DS8700 disk arrays from IBM was rigged to look bad against eight racks of Exadata X2-2 database clusters. If you read what I wrote, I did just that, also pointing out that the comparison that Oracle made did not include the cost of the systems software, which was much cheaper on the IBM box and, at list price anyway, utterly dwarfed the cost of the hardware. And the funny thing is, IBM never did issue any kind of counter claims or pick apart the comparisons or make better ones.

    How is it that I do IBM’s job? Can I get IBM to pay me for it?

    Seems unlikely.

    The Exadata machine is jacked up on special Exadata storage arrays, with hybrid columnar compression on the database to speed up certain kinds of transactions, as well as having massive amounts of data compression. The machine is also packed with more flash memory to speed up I/O and therefore the database. A fair comparison would have used a flash-based PureScale cluster, or at least admitted that it was comparing two different kinds of systems–a database cluster and a big wonking SMP box. The NAD didn’t say jack about that, and quite likely because it doesn’t understand what either IBM or Oracle are talking about. What Ellison said back in September 2007 was that an Exadata cluster spanning two racks could do transactions anywhere from 10 to 50 times faster than the Power 795 backed by four DS8700 arrays. He also said an Exadata setup spanning eight racks delivering three times the processor cores, 3.5 times the storage capacity, 4.5 times the flash, and has 13.5 times the storage bandwidth, and 10 times the storage I/O operations per second. Such an eight-rack Exadata setup would cost $8.8 million compared to $18.6 million for the IBM setup.

    Anyway, after the March complaint by IBM, Oracle pulled the ads.

    Oracle has been running another set of ads, which claim Exadata runs 20X faster than IBM Power machines, and that this data came from a European retailer who switched platforms. IBM complained to the NAD once again, and correctly claimed that the 20X comparison between Exadata and Power was “overly broad,” which it sure as heck is. Oracle said it was a case study, not a general claim, and said further that we would all get that here in IT Land. The NAD disagreed, and on July 26 handed down a ruling against Oracle and said that Ellison & Co had done the right thing and stopped distributing the disputed ad materials.

    Oracle plans to appeal the NAD’s finding, apparently. It seems more likely that Oracle will announce a bunch of new systems at Oracle OpenWorld in late September and early October, and make all kinds of claims then.

    What IBM needs to do is stop messing around and show off all the goodies in its servers, storage arrays, operating systems, and database software and actually prove that its stack is as good as Oracle’s “engineered systems.” IBM spends far too much time talking about Smarter Planet and not enough time talking about Smarter Systems. And relying on the NAD to slap Oracle’s wrist (if it is even that) after the message is out there in the market doesn’t really fix anything.

    And another thing: I have been asking IBM for nearly a decade, and probably since 1995 if my memory serves, to build a cluster of low-cost, entry machines to compete with Oracle’s gridded database engines (that’s what the “g” in Oracle 11g stands for, after all) head-to-head. And I have also suggested that IBM should build those clusters from OS/400 and now IBM i systems. Take the fight to Oracle. Stop reacting and act.

    RELATED STORIES

    Oracle Has Built A Modern, Cloudy AS/400

    Oracle Takes The Midrange Fight To IBM

    Oracle Tries To Woo Midrange Shops With Database Appliance

    Oracle-Sun Exadata V2, Meet iDatabase V1

    HP and Oracle Launch Database Machine, and So Can IBM with i

    The System iWant, 2007 Edition

    Forget Oracle 10g. Let’s Talk About i5/OS V5g

    DB2/400: The Heart of a Supercomputer Cluster?

    Future iSeries Servers, Part 2



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    WorksRight Software

    Do you need area code information?
    Do you need ZIP Code information?
    Do you need ZIP+4 information?
    Do you need city name information?
    Do you need county information?
    Do you need a nearest dealer locator system?

    We can HELP! We have affordable AS/400 software and data to do all of the above. Whether you need a simple city name retrieval system or a sophisticated CASS postal coding system, we have it for you!

    The ZIP/CITY system is based on 5-digit ZIP Codes. You can retrieve city names, state names, county names, area codes, time zones, latitude, longitude, and more just by knowing the ZIP Code. We supply information on all the latest area code changes. A nearest dealer locator function is also included. ZIP/CITY includes software, data, monthly updates, and unlimited support. The cost is $495 per year.

    PER/ZIP4 is a sophisticated CASS certified postal coding system for assigning ZIP Codes, ZIP+4, carrier route, and delivery point codes. PER/ZIP4 also provides county names and FIPS codes. PER/ZIP4 can be used interactively, in batch, and with callable programs. PER/ZIP4 includes software, data, monthly updates, and unlimited support. The cost is $3,900 for the first year, and $1,950 for renewal.

    Just call us and we’ll arrange for 30 days FREE use of either ZIP/CITY or PER/ZIP4.

    WorksRight Software, Inc.
    Phone: 601-856-8337
    Fax: 601-856-9432
    Email: software@worksright.com
    Website: www.worksright.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: The Right Way To Delete User Profiles, Part 1 TEMBO Sets Out to Save IBM i with Database Modernization

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 21, Number 28 -- August 6, 2012
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Enforcive
Profound Logic Software
Maxava
Computer Keyes
RJS Software Systems

Table of Contents

  • IBM i Wins Software Pricing Throwdown Versus AIX-DB2 Combo
  • Big Blue Gives A Solid Installed Base Number For IBM i
  • Midsize IBM i Shops Find BI in Document Distribution
  • Mad Dog 21/21: For Whom The Tolls Bill
  • Oracle Slapped Over Anti-Power Advertising Campaigns
  • Reader Feedback On IBM Gives Killer Power System Deals Down Under
  • Bleak Outlook for European IT Spending Through 2013
  • Services Prop Up Manhattan Associates In Q2, Capel Tapped As Next CEO
  • Avnet Schools Partners On Pushing Innovation
  • SAP Breaks Records In Q2, Fires Up SMB BI Partners

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Public Preview For Watson Code Assistant for i Available Soon
  • COMMON Youth Movement Continues at POWERUp 2025
  • IBM Preserves Memory Investments Across Power10 And Power11
  • Eradani Uses AI For New EDI And API Service
  • Picking Apart IBM’s $150 Billion In US Manufacturing And R&D
  • FAX/400 And CICS For i Are Dead. What Will IBM Kill Next?
  • Fresche Overhauls X-Analysis With Web UI, AI Smarts
  • Is It Time To Add The Rust Programming Language To IBM i?
  • Is IBM Going To Raise Prices On Power10 Expert Care?
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 20

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle