• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • All i Want For Christmas Is RDi Lite

    December 12, 2018 Alex Woodie

    All some IBM i community members wanted for the holidays was RDi Lite. Instead, they’re looking at IBM like the Grinch due to its decision not to offer a free, scaled-down version of the application development tool. What’s more, the community is expressing great displeasure at the manner in which IBM handled the matter through its Request for Enhancement (RFE) process.

    Hassan Farooqi kicked off the campaign for RDi Lite in August 2017, when he posted an RFE on the new IBM developerWorks website that’s designed to facilitate collaboration with its user communities by allowing them to submit ideas for new products and features. Farooqi’s RFE (#108558) asked IBM to split RDi into two pieces: a free version that offered basic capabilities, dubbed RDi Lite, and a more advanced version that had all the bells and whistles, dubbed RDi Premium.

    Citing the overall low-level of adoption of RDi in the IBM i community and the growing need to get IBM i community using modern tools, Farooqi argued that a scaled-down version of RDi would lead to a better alignment of costs and capabilities in the wider IBM i community.

    “RDi pricing makes management hesitant to allocate budget,” Farooqi wrote in his initial RFE. “They can’t see the return on investment. To make ROI more obvious, we need a light version of RDi that is free and includes the basic functions of SEU: editing, compiling, running and debugging. The remaining hundreds of features can remain in the paid version.”

    The response from the IBM i community was almost entirely positive over the months that followed, if the comments in the RFE are any measure. “A free or even reduced price (under $100) would be a game changer for this product. As discussed, the $800 price tag plus retraining is cost prohibitive for my shop,” wrote Brian Bradley. “This is awesome,” wrote Alex Krashevsky. “RDi price is way beyond understandable…” wrote Jan Salminen.

    A screenshot of RFE #108558 shows IBM has marked the request “delivered.”

    At first, IBM seemed receptive to the idea. “Implementing this RFE is good for the platform,” wrote Dawn May, IBM’s advisor to the COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC), COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC), and the Large User Group (LUG). “It will result in additional users of RDi and as a result, moving applications forward.” (May has since left IBM to run her own consultancy).

    Earlier this year, IBM changed the status of the RFE to “delivered,” which indicates that it would take action in support of the request. On June 13, an IBM product manager explained that in a future release, RDi would be available free to use within a 120-day evaluation period, up from the current 60-day period.

    The IBM product manager also explained the different ways that customers can get RDi (via the hardware channel, through Passport Advantage, as a trade-in of entitlements, and through a bundle with an MSP). The manager also explained that RDi is available at up to 50 percent discount through various programs. All told, the RFE received 344 votes, although it’s not clear whether those votes were in support of the RFE, because that information is not provided on the website.

    IBM’s response to the RFE – and in particular, how it categorized the request as “delivered” — was not taken well by the IBM i community, to say the least. Here’s a sampling of some of the comments made on the RFE:

    “What has been ‘delivered’ is not a free, limited version of RDi,” writes Ted Holt, the editor of IT Jungle’s Four Hundred Guru and a developer at Profound Logic. “I ask IBM to reconsider this request.”

    “Closing this as ‘delivered’ is a farce,” wrote John Yeung. “It is a slap in the face because it is disingenuous and comes across as completely and utterly tone-deaf.”

    “RFE closed incorrectly,” wrote Rohit Sharma. “The request was to provide a ‘lite’ or basic version that was free to use.”

    IBM “delivered” on the RDi Lite RFE like the Grinch “delivered” on Christmas.

    “Please correct the status of this item,” wrote Kevin Wright. “An RDi Lite (whatever the name), which is the point of this RFE, has not been delivered.”

    “Either change the status or change your action but the current state of things is a lie,” writes Mihael Schmidt.

    “I do agree with those who claim that Delivered status was given here prematurely,” wrote Alex Krashevsky. “The requestor was asking for RDi Lite with basic functionality that would come with operating system with no extra charge, and it’s hard to see how that is currently ‘delivered.'”

    “It is truly sad and unfortunate, that our efforts was met with a ‘Delivered’ response, which is simply untrue,” writes Marinus Van Sandwyk on the ILE-RPG developers group on LinkedIn. “Please review the original request and our recent APPEAL to IBM to please review this favourably. Please consider adding your voice to this appeal? This is a CRUCIAL component for the ILE-RPG Developer community, as we want to do our bit for IBM i and the future of our platform?”

    However, it appears unlikely that IBM will reconsider the matter. “This request cannot be reconsidered. Only requests that have been declined can be reconsidered,” it states under the “Reconsideration” tab on Farooqui’s RFE.

    RELATED STORIES

    IBM i And RDi: Where There’s Smoke, There’s Fire

    If RDi Was Free, Would You Go For A Ride?

    Vote On New IBM i Functionality With RFE Community Program

    IBM i Requirements: It’s About (To) Change

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: CAAC, CEAC, COMMON Americas Advisory Council, COMMON Europe Advisory Council, developerWorks, IBM i, ILE, Large User Group, LUG, RDi, RDi Lite, Request for Enhancement, RFE, RPG, SEU

    Sponsored by
    WorksRight Software

    Do you need area code information?
    Do you need ZIP Code information?
    Do you need ZIP+4 information?
    Do you need city name information?
    Do you need county information?
    Do you need a nearest dealer locator system?

    We can HELP! We have affordable AS/400 software and data to do all of the above. Whether you need a simple city name retrieval system or a sophisticated CASS postal coding system, we have it for you!

    The ZIP/CITY system is based on 5-digit ZIP Codes. You can retrieve city names, state names, county names, area codes, time zones, latitude, longitude, and more just by knowing the ZIP Code. We supply information on all the latest area code changes. A nearest dealer locator function is also included. ZIP/CITY includes software, data, monthly updates, and unlimited support. The cost is $495 per year.

    PER/ZIP4 is a sophisticated CASS certified postal coding system for assigning ZIP Codes, ZIP+4, carrier route, and delivery point codes. PER/ZIP4 also provides county names and FIPS codes. PER/ZIP4 can be used interactively, in batch, and with callable programs. PER/ZIP4 includes software, data, monthly updates, and unlimited support. The cost is $3,900 for the first year, and $1,950 for renewal.

    Just call us and we’ll arrange for 30 days FREE use of either ZIP/CITY or PER/ZIP4.

    WorksRight Software, Inc.
    Phone: 601-856-8337
    Fax: 601-856-9432
    Email: software@worksright.com
    Website: www.worksright.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Open Source Is the Future, So Where Does IBM i Fit In? IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 20, Numbers 50 And 51

    Comments are currently closed.

TFH Volume: 28 Issue: 83

This Issue Sponsored By

  • iTech Solutions
  • Datanational Corporation
  • COMMON
  • WorksRight Software
  • HiT Software, Inc. a BackOffice Associates Company

Table of Contents

  • All i Want For Christmas Is RDi Lite
  • Open Source Is the Future, So Where Does IBM i Fit In?
  • Happy Holidays From IT Jungle
  • Four Hundred Monitor, December 12
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 20, Number 49

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • To Comfort The Afflicted And Afflict The Comfortable
  • How FalconStor Is Reinventing Itself, And Why IBM Noticed
  • Guru: When Procedure Driven RPG Really Works
  • Vendors Fill In The Gaps With IBM’s New MFA Solution
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 27
  • With Power11, Power Systems “Go To Eleven”
  • With Subscription Price, IBM i P20 And P30 Tiers Get Bigger Bundles
  • Izzi Buys CNX, Eyes Valence Port To System Z
  • IBM i Shops “Attacking” Security Concerns, Study Shows
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 26

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle