• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Ballmer Dishes on Big Blue; Why Should Ellison Have All the Fun?

    October 12, 2009 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Last week, it was Oracle‘s chief executive officer, Larry Ellison, explaining how he wanted to buy Sun Microsystems to be the platform company of the 21st century as IBM was back in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. And now we have Microsoft‘s CEO, Steve Ballmer, bashing Big Blue for its profit-obsessed business strategy.

    Yes, we have woken up, once again, in BizarroWorld.

    In an interview with the New York Times, Ballmer basically called IBM a chicken, one that ditches businesses that it helped create–networking, memory chips, disk drives, PCs, printers–in an obsessive desire to squeeze profits out of everything it does.

    “IBM is the company that is notable for going the other direction,” Ballmer told the Times, a paper that has had strong ties to Big Blue for decades for obvious reasons. (Both are New York institutions that have tried to go broke more than once.) “IBM’s footprint is more narrow today than it was when I started. I am not sure that has been to the long-term benefit of their shareholders.”

    You can criticize IBM for not figuring out how to make a disk drive or a PC or an operating system for it profitably–I am with you there. But I think it is perfectly idiotic to suggest that IBM needs to stay in businesses that it cannot make money in, at least from the point of view of shareholders. From the point of view of an observer and sometime participant in the IT sector, I think Big Blue had benefits to gain by staying in the PC and related desktop operating system space, and I would agree that an IBM that thinks the way it clearly does might be sorely tempted to stop making servers and farm that job out to someone else, too.

    IBM normally brushes off this kind of criticism, and its own soft-spoken top exec, Sam Palmisano, is not one to take any argument he might have about IBM’s tactics and strategies to the press. But a few days later, at an event hosting Palmisano and the newly designated and first chief information officer for the Federal government, Aneesh Chopra, IBM’s president, CEO, and chairman didn’t take the bait, but did make an oblique reference to Ballmer’s criticism, which was again reported in the Times.

    “People say IBM invented the PC, I.B.M. invented the disk drive. Why sell it?” Palmisano asked rhetorically, and then answered it saying that “a $300 netbook is a commodity” and that businesses get trapped by their “cultural resistance to change.”

    In past speeches, Palmisano has referred to IBM’s own resistance to change in the early 1990s as a “near death experience” where the company had to lay off nearly half of its 400,000 employees and radically transform itself. It is not clear that Palmisano was intimating that Microsoft had itself become a legacy IT supplier itself, one trying to expand into new markets while holding rigidly to the monopolies it has, but the comparison between the Microsoft of the late 2000s and the IBM of the late 1980s is probably not lost on long-time IT observers. A lot of what Microsoft does these days is to react to what other players do and to spend great big buckets of money trying to chase new markets established by other players–just like IBM used to do.

    Ballmer is probably just miffed that IBM likes Linux, is happy to sell Lotus Symphony as a replacement for Office, is still selling Notes and Domino against Outlook and Exchange, and can still sell Power Systems and mainframes against Windows boxes at a lot of accounts.

    I think IBM needs to go back to being a full platform company, from the chip up through applications–the kind of thing that Ellison is trying to build with the combination of Oracle and Sun. If there is any justifiable criticism of IBM, it is that it is far too happy to make money helping customers cobbling together mix-and-match IT systems and not interested enough in building integrated systems that include applications, like the AS/400 of days gone by.

    RELATED STORIES

    Ellison Wants Oracle to Be IBM 1.5

    EU Haunts Oracle-Sun, Oracle Taunts IBM

    Sun Shareholders Vote to Sell to Oracle

    Jilted Sun Snapped Up by Oracle for Application Systems

    IBM Really, Really Doesn’t Want Sun

    The IBM-Sun Saga Continues–Or Rather, Doesn’t

    IBM Poised to Buy Sun, Rumors Say

    Wall Street Makes IBM, Sun Strange Bedfellows?



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 18, Number 36 -- October 12, 2009

    Sponsored by
    Maxava

    Migrate IBM i with Confidence

    Tired of costly and risky migrations? Maxava Migrate Live minimizes disruption with seamless transitions. Upgrading to Power10 or cloud hosted system, Maxava has you covered!

    Learn More

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: The Great CBU Survey and More Cloud Storage Services Make their Way to the i OS Midrange

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 18 Issue: 36

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • IBM’s DB2 Pure Scale–Not Quite iDatabase V1
    • Early Views on iManifest: ISV Expectations, Public Misconceptions
    • News Flash: IT to Drive Economic Recovery
    • As I See It: The Greening of IT
    • The Power Systems Catalog Gets Skinnier
    • Reader Feedback on Moore’s Law and the Performance Wall
    • Ballmer Dishes on Big Blue; Why Should Ellison Have All the Fun?
    • IBM Deals on Blade Chassis, Tivoli Provisioning Manager
    • Notes/Domino 8.5.1 Dances with the iPhone
    • Much Ado About IBM’s Mainframe Monopoly; Once Again, the i Is Overlooked

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Public Preview For Watson Code Assistant for i Available Soon
    • COMMON Youth Movement Continues at POWERUp 2025
    • IBM Preserves Memory Investments Across Power10 And Power11
    • Eradani Uses AI For New EDI And API Service
    • Picking Apart IBM’s $150 Billion In US Manufacturing And R&D
    • FAX/400 And CICS For i Are Dead. What Will IBM Kill Next?
    • Fresche Overhauls X-Analysis With Web UI, AI Smarts
    • Is It Time To Add The Rust Programming Language To IBM i?
    • Is IBM Going To Raise Prices On Power10 Expert Care?
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 20

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle