• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Readers Prefer ISDB

    December 11, 2002 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Dear Readers:

    In the article, “Use the Full-Screen Debugger with OPM Programs,” which published in the November 6, 2002, edition of Midrange Guru, I asked for your reasons why you prefer ISDB to the full-screen ILE debugger. Several of you responded.

    Here are the reasons some Midrange Guru readers prefer ISDB, in order of preference.

    Most readers liked the fact that ISBD allows you to watch the value of one or more variables as you step through the source code. The variables’ values are shown at the top of the display. STRDBG requires you to continually press F11 or use the eval command to view the value of a variable.

    The fact that you can type RUN lineno at the ISDB command line or place the cursor on a line (and press F13), to which ISDB runs and stops regardless of breakpoints, is the second highest preference among readers.

    The least preferred choice is ISDB’s use of different colors for the different types of source lines. Source code lines are shown in green by default, but comments are in white, I/O operations are in red, nesting structures are purple, and array definitions are shown in blue.

    Here are some of the additional comments I received.

    Thom wrote:

    The watch command exists in both debuggers with very different operations behind them. I find both watch operations useful and, in fact, I feel that each debugger really needs to have the other’s WATCH command along side its own.

    The one thing I don’t like about the ILE debugger is the fact that I no longer have the option of turning off the interactive portion of it and using the old trace listing methods. Occasionally when debugging a run of large amounts of data where very few records are in error, I find it more convenient to look at a trace listing.

    Lynne wrote:

    On the other hand, STRDBG is superior to STRISDB for two reasons.

    Using WATCH on a variable halts program execution when the variable changes, which is invaluable when you have NO idea where in the program the field value is being changed and/or corrupted.

    This choice is much friendlier to use when debugging a serviced job. On my shop’s system we have so many jobs active at any given time that it is a pain to find your job in the list provided by STRISDB.

    Toni wrote:

    It is confusing using both versions as the function keys are different.

    Thank you, Larry, Thom, Pam, Rich, Lynne, Ken, Pete, Fred, Bob, and Toni for your input.

    — Ted

    Sponsored By
    inFORM DECISIONS

    ELIMINATE THE COSTS OF PRE-PRINTED FORMS, LABOR AND POSTAGE WITH
    inFORM Decisions iDocs™ ‘Suite’

    iSeries based e-Forms, e-Checks, e-Mail, e-FAX, and Document Retrieval from the Web are available as individual modules or as a complete e-Document processing ‘Suite’.

    Click to Download the Complete Suite or Individual Modules today
    www.inFORMDecisions.com

    or call (800) 858-5544

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mgo_rc, Volume 2, Number 92 -- December 11, 2002

    Sponsored by
    VISUAL LANSA 16 WEBINAR

    Trying to balance stability and agility in your IBM i environment?

    Join this webinar and explore Visual LANSA 16 – our enhanced professional low-code platform designed to help organizations running on IBM i evolve seamlessly for what’s next.

    🎙️VISUAL LANSA 16 WEBINAR

    Break Monolithic IBM i Applications and Unlock New Value

    Explore modernization without rewriting. Decouple monolithic applications and extend their value through integration with modern services, web frameworks, and cloud technologies.

    🗓️ July 10, 2025

    ⏰ 9 AM – 10 AM CDT (4 PM to 5 PM CEST)

    See the webinar schedule in your time zone

    Register to join the webinar now

    What to Expect

    • Get to know Visual LANSA 16, its core features, latest enhancements, and use cases
    • Understand how you can transition to a MACH-aligned architecture to enable faster innovation
    • Discover native REST APIs, WebView2 support, cloud-ready Azure licensing, and more to help transform and scale your IBM i applications

    Read more about V16 here.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Performance of the SQL LIKE Predicate Reader Feedback and Insights: RPG Compiler Directives and V4

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

MGO Volume: 2 Issue: 92

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • SBMJOB’s RQSDTA Parameter
    • Subfile Positioning
    • Readers Prefer ISDB

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • With Power11, Power Systems “Go To Eleven”
    • With Subscription Price, IBM i P20 And P30 Tiers Get Bigger Bundles
    • Izzi Buys CNX, Eyes Valence Port To System Z
    • IBM i Shops “Attacking” Security Concerns, Study Shows
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 26
    • Liam Allan Shares What’s Coming Next With Code For IBM i
    • From Stable To Scalable: Visual LANSA 16 Powers IBM i Growth – Launching July 8
    • VS Code Will Be The Heart Of The Modern IBM i Platform
    • The AS/400: A 37-Year-Old Dog That Loves To Learn New Tricks
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 25

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle