• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Readers Prefer ISDB

    December 11, 2002 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Dear Readers:

    In the article, “Use the Full-Screen Debugger with OPM Programs,” which published in the November 6, 2002, edition of Midrange Guru, I asked for your reasons why you prefer ISDB to the full-screen ILE debugger. Several of you responded.

    Here are the reasons some Midrange Guru readers prefer ISDB, in order of preference.

    Most readers liked the fact that ISBD allows you to watch the value of one or more variables as you step through the source code. The variables’ values are shown at the top of the display. STRDBG requires you to continually press F11 or use the eval command to view the value of a variable.

    The fact that you can type RUN lineno at the ISDB command line or place the cursor on a line (and press F13), to which ISDB runs and stops regardless of breakpoints, is the second highest preference among readers.

    The least preferred choice is ISDB’s use of different colors for the different types of source lines. Source code lines are shown in green by default, but comments are in white, I/O operations are in red, nesting structures are purple, and array definitions are shown in blue.

    Here are some of the additional comments I received.

    Thom wrote:

    The watch command exists in both debuggers with very different operations behind them. I find both watch operations useful and, in fact, I feel that each debugger really needs to have the other’s WATCH command along side its own.

    The one thing I don’t like about the ILE debugger is the fact that I no longer have the option of turning off the interactive portion of it and using the old trace listing methods. Occasionally when debugging a run of large amounts of data where very few records are in error, I find it more convenient to look at a trace listing.

    Lynne wrote:

    On the other hand, STRDBG is superior to STRISDB for two reasons.

    Using WATCH on a variable halts program execution when the variable changes, which is invaluable when you have NO idea where in the program the field value is being changed and/or corrupted.

    This choice is much friendlier to use when debugging a serviced job. On my shop’s system we have so many jobs active at any given time that it is a pain to find your job in the list provided by STRISDB.

    Toni wrote:

    It is confusing using both versions as the function keys are different.

    Thank you, Larry, Thom, Pam, Rich, Lynne, Ken, Pete, Fred, Bob, and Toni for your input.

    — Ted

    Sponsored By
    inFORM DECISIONS

    ELIMINATE THE COSTS OF PRE-PRINTED FORMS, LABOR AND POSTAGE WITH
    inFORM Decisions iDocs™ ‘Suite’

    iSeries based e-Forms, e-Checks, e-Mail, e-FAX, and Document Retrieval from the Web are available as individual modules or as a complete e-Document processing ‘Suite’.

    Click to Download the Complete Suite or Individual Modules today
    www.inFORMDecisions.com

    or call (800) 858-5544

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mgo_rc, Volume 2, Number 92 -- December 11, 2002

    Sponsored by
    ARCAD Software

    Are you ready for AI on the IBM i? Optimization and guardrails. . .

    what you need to know today

    with Jeff Tickner

    As organizations assess the role and impact of AI, they must make informed choices, particularly around implementing guardrails to ensure secure and controlled usage.

    In this Lunch & Learn session, Jeff Tickner, CTO North America of ARCAD Software, and Alan Ashley, Sr. Solution Architect, will explore how to effectively prepare for the adoption of AI in IBM i environments.

    This session will cover key AI considerations, including:

    • Preparing source
    • Defining security rules and ensuring data privacy
    • Leveraging MCP Servers for optimization

    A deeper dive will also address:

    • The use of MCP Servers with BOB and other AI assistants
    • ARCAD’s approach to integrating AI into DevOps processes through MCP

    Register Now!

    By registering for this session, I acknowledge that my contact information will be shared with the sponsor, ARCAD.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Subfile Positioning Reader Feedback and Insights: RPG Compiler Directives and V4

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

MGO Volume: 2 Issue: 92

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • SBMJOB’s RQSDTA Parameter
    • Subfile Positioning
    • Readers Prefer ISDB

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Power Systems Still Waiting For The GenAI Bump
    • The IBM i and the Hybrid Cloud World: Things To Keep In Mind
    • CData Adds Db2 for i Support to CDC Tool
    • As I See It: The Cost of Having Ethics
    • Brace Yourself: Another Power Systems Price Hike Coming May 1
    • Updates Announced for IBM i BRMS And SMTP Email Client
    • AI Will Be Front And Center At POWERUp 2026 Next Week
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 16
    • Spring IBM i Tech Refreshes Will Come A Bit Later This Year
    • You Are Much More Than Power Systems, And So Are We

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle