• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Readers Prefer ISDB

    December 11, 2002 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Dear Readers:

    In the article, “Use the Full-Screen Debugger with OPM Programs,” which published in the November 6, 2002, edition of Midrange Guru, I asked for your reasons why you prefer ISDB to the full-screen ILE debugger. Several of you responded.

    Here are the reasons some Midrange Guru readers prefer ISDB, in order of preference.

    Most readers liked the fact that ISBD allows you to watch the value of one or more variables as you step through the source code. The variables’ values are shown at the top of the display. STRDBG requires you to continually press F11 or use the eval command to view the value of a variable.

    The fact that you can type RUN lineno at the ISDB command line or place the cursor on a line (and press F13), to which ISDB runs and stops regardless of breakpoints, is the second highest preference among readers.

    The least preferred choice is ISDB’s use of different colors for the different types of source lines. Source code lines are shown in green by default, but comments are in white, I/O operations are in red, nesting structures are purple, and array definitions are shown in blue.

    Here are some of the additional comments I received.

    Thom wrote:

    The watch command exists in both debuggers with very different operations behind them. I find both watch operations useful and, in fact, I feel that each debugger really needs to have the other’s WATCH command along side its own.

    The one thing I don’t like about the ILE debugger is the fact that I no longer have the option of turning off the interactive portion of it and using the old trace listing methods. Occasionally when debugging a run of large amounts of data where very few records are in error, I find it more convenient to look at a trace listing.

    Lynne wrote:

    On the other hand, STRDBG is superior to STRISDB for two reasons.

    Using WATCH on a variable halts program execution when the variable changes, which is invaluable when you have NO idea where in the program the field value is being changed and/or corrupted.

    This choice is much friendlier to use when debugging a serviced job. On my shop’s system we have so many jobs active at any given time that it is a pain to find your job in the list provided by STRISDB.

    Toni wrote:

    It is confusing using both versions as the function keys are different.

    Thank you, Larry, Thom, Pam, Rich, Lynne, Ken, Pete, Fred, Bob, and Toni for your input.

    — Ted

    Sponsored By
    inFORM DECISIONS

    ELIMINATE THE COSTS OF PRE-PRINTED FORMS, LABOR AND POSTAGE WITH
    inFORM Decisions iDocs™ ‘Suite’

    iSeries based e-Forms, e-Checks, e-Mail, e-FAX, and Document Retrieval from the Web are available as individual modules or as a complete e-Document processing ‘Suite’.

    Click to Download the Complete Suite or Individual Modules today
    www.inFORMDecisions.com

    or call (800) 858-5544

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mgo_rc, Volume 2, Number 92 -- December 11, 2002

    Sponsored by
    Lightedge

    Your IBM Power Cloud Strategy Should Start With “Why?”

    Moving IBM i to the cloud isn’t just an infrastructure decision.

    A hardware refresh, data center exit, IBM i skills gap, disaster recovery requirement, or broader cloud initiative can each lead to a very different architecture.

    At Lightedge, we start by understanding what you’re trying to accomplish. Then we look at the workload, application dependencies, resiliency requirements, operating model, and long-term strategy to determine where that workload belongs.

    Managed IBM Power cloud? IBM Power Virtual Server? DR in the cloud? A hybrid architecture connecting IBM Power with AWS or Azure?

    There isn’t one right answer for every IBM i environment.

    Start with the business requirement. Understand the workload. Then decide where it belongs.

    Explore IBM Power cloud, managed services, and hybrid solutions from Lightedge.

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Subfile Positioning Reader Feedback and Insights: RPG Compiler Directives and V4

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

MGO Volume: 2 Issue: 92

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • SBMJOB’s RQSDTA Parameter
    • Subfile Positioning
    • Readers Prefer ISDB

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Will Power Chips Get A Converged Arm Instruction Set Like Z Mainframe CPUs?
    • Thinking About Moving IBM i To The Cloud? Don’t Start With The Quote
    • Precisely To Add Ransomware Protection In MIMIX 11
    • It’s D-Day For Cybersecurity, AI Firms Warn
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 30
    • Oracle Dips A Toe Into IBM’s EBCDIC World
    • When Your Small IBM i Team Is Really A Team Of One
    • Guru: Putting Failure Handling In Its Place
    • Inside The Security Enhancements In ACS
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 28: A Crazy Number of Security Vulnerability Patches

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle