• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Common Sense Comparisons

    May 17, 2006 Hey, Esteemed, Professional Colleagues

    Today’s technical tip is not rocket science, but that’s OK with me because rocket science won’t help me keep the factory going. No, today’s tip is a practical, yet very simple, SQL (and OPNQRYF) technique that I hope to use regularly for years to come.

    One of the first things that was drilled into my bald head in my early days of computer programming was that you can’t compare numeric data to character data. It didn’t matter what the language was–RPG II, COBOL 68, FORTRAN IV, GW-BASIC–numeric and character were apples and oranges.

    I never questioned this restriction until I started working in a production environment. That’s when I found out that a certain datum–a date, an item number, or a department code, for instance–might be stored in a numeric field in one file but in an alpha field in another file. Comparing fields of different types required me to convert one of the fields to the type of the other. Why couldn’t the computer do that conversion for me?

    In V5R3, IBM loosened up this restriction in certain places. I’ve discovered two of those places–SQL and Open Query File (OPNQRYF). It is possible as of V5R3 to compare numeric data to character data, with the computer handling the conversion. The rub is that the alpha field must contain valid numeric data.

    As a simple example, consider a file with two fields–a four-byte alpha field cleverly named ALPHA and a five-digit numeric field of zero decimal places named NUM. The following query uses the DECIMAL function to illustrate what the system will and will not like in character-to-numeric comparisons.

    select num, alpha, dec (alpha,4,0)
    from some file
    

    If I execute this query in interactive SQL, this is what I see.

    NUM     ALPHA      DEC 
      3-    -3           3-
      3-    - 3      ++++++
      3-    -  3     ++++++
      3-    3-       ++++++
      0              ++++++
      1     1            1 
      2      2           2 
      3     +3           3 
      4     0004         4 
      4     0  4     ++++++
      5     5.0          5 
     40     4 0      ++++++
    

    The lines with the plus signs in the third column show which character values will not convert to numeric during a character-to-numeric comparison. Notice what the system likes. Leading and trailing blanks are ignored, but embedded ones are not. You may include a leading plus sign or minus sign, and you may include a decimal point.

    So far I have used character-to-numeric comparisons in two SQL clauses–WHERE and JOIN–and they work as I expected.

    select *
       from SomeFile
       where CharField > NumField
    

    OPNQRYF also allows comparison of character to numeric data. The following commands select the records where an alpha field is equal to a numeric field.

    OPNQRYF FILE((ONEFILE))
       QRYSLT('alpha *eq num') 
    CPYFRMQRYF FROMOPNID(ONEFILE) TOFILE(ANOTHER) +
       CRTFILE(*YES)
    

    However, Query/400 does not allow character-to-numeric comparisons, at least not in V5R3.

    –Ted

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    ARCAD Software

    [Live Webinar] Rewrite your Synon in Java? It could be… a mistake!

    Converting from Synon CA 2E to a modern language? There are many good reasons to take this step. Beyond the critical shortage of Synon skills, applications developed in this 4GL environment can no longer take advantage of key technology advances in the IBM i operating system. And though a leader in its day, the Synon CASE tool is incompatible with modern DevOps practices and concurrent development.

    Do you think the best way to move away from Synon CA 2E is by rewriting everything in Java?

    Think again. A full rewrite is risky, expensive, and slow — often leading to years of redevelopment and countless functional regressions.

    Join Philippe Magne, CEO of ARCAD Software and Ray Bernardi, senior solution architect to learn why a conversion to Free Form RPG is a risk-free and high-performance option that leverages the architecture of the original Synon application – retaining all the reliability and security advantages of the host platform.

    In our Webinar, we will share a secure, automated migration path for business applications developed in Synon CA 2E:

    • 100% automated conversion to modern Free Form RPG and DDL (SQL)
    • Guaranteed conversion accuracy with test automation process
    • Possible modernization of the user interface during the project
    • Risk free, fixed price Modernization as a Service (MaaS)
    • Modern full DevOps framework for delivery

    Leverage the competitive advantage within your Synon application.

    Register Today!

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Sponsored Links

    Bytware:  Network security, anti-virus, monitoring, notification/alerts, file recovery, & compliance
    COMMON:  Join us at the Fall 2006 conference, September 17-21, in Miami Beach, Florida
    ProData Computer Services:  Use Server Proven DBU-on-demand for $10 a day anytime, anywhere!

    TMW Systems Gets New CEO Sun Microsystems Begins Taking Java Open Source

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 6, Number 20 -- May 17, 2006
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

WorksRight Software
Asymex
Profound Logic Software

Table of Contents

  • Debugging iSeries Java Applications Remotely
  • Common Sense Comparisons
  • STRCPYSCN: The Poor Man’s 5250 Remote Control Program

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Bang For The Buck On Entry Power10 And Power11 Machines
  • A Hardware Refresh Is The Perfect Time To Re-Evaluate Your HA/DR Strategy
  • Fresche Taps AI For New RPG-To-Java Conversion Tool
  • Gartner Raises 2025 IT Spending Forecast, Puts Out 2026 Prediction
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 45
  • EvolveWare Makes Progress With RPG Code Modernization Using AI
  • Why The IBM i Market Needed Another VTL Option
  • What Price Power?
  • Cloud Revenues Saved By The GenAI Boom
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 44

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle