• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Freescale Claims Breakthrough in MRAM Memory

    July 17, 2006 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Freescale Semiconductor, the chip manufacturing company that was spun out of Motorola, announced last week that it has commercialized a new memory technology called Magnetoresistive Random Access Memory, or MRAM, that looks as if it will shake up the computer business.

    Magnetoresistive, or MR, technologies were first commercialized in the disk heads of IBM disk drives created by the Rochester, Minnesota, laboratories–back when Big Blue used to create its own memory and disk storage technologies. Motorola is the first company to commercialize the use of MR technologies in memory chips. MRAM is a non volatile memory technology, like flash memory, which means it does not need electricity to keep its 1s and 0s in order and therefore store information, as Dynamic RAM, or DRAM, does. But MRAM is also designed to have something akin to the speed of static RAM, or SRAM, and uses magnetic fields to flip bits, which means that anything in memory stays in memory, even if the power is turned off. This makes MRAM something of a dream, if you are a systems designer.

    Of course, DRAM has speed as well as capacity. The most popular DDR2 Synchronous DRAM comes in 64 Mbit chip capacities and modules that have 1 GB or 2 GB of total capacity; cycle times on this memory range from 3.75 nanoseconds to 5 nanoseconds. Motorola’s first MRAM chip is quite a bit skinnier and a lot slower, being a 4 Mbit device that has a 35 nanosecond read and write cycle time; it costs about $25 a pop. Part of the problem with the speed of this Freescale MRAM is that is was made with a comparatively ancient 180 nanometer chip technology at Freescale. IBM has demonstrated MRAM with cycle times as low as 2 nanoseconds using more modern processes. Flash memory has its limits because it takes microseconds, not nanoseconds, to move data from the cells on the flash memory to the read/write buffer, although once the data is there, it can move at speeds approaching Motorola’s current MRAM.

    It would be interesting to see memory makers really push MRAM technologies to the limits and for server makers to stop messing around so much with chip speeds and get MRAM devices, which can compete on price with DRAM and offer many of the benefits of flash memory without the drawbacks. At the very least, MRAM is perfect for replacing the battery-backed SRAM units that sit as front-ends to main memory and disk controllers on a lot of servers.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 15, Number 28 -- July 17, 2006

    Sponsored by
    FOCAL POINT SOLUTIONS GROUP

    IntellaFLASH™

    FPSG is the only hosting provider that offers IntellaFLASH™.  IntellaFLASH was created by FPSG and is an exclusive FPSG solution that provides the following:

    • No User downtime for production backups
    • Supports BRMS and Tivoli Storage Manager
    • Provides near Continuous Data Protection (CDP)
    • Create point-in-time copies of your entire environment within minutes
    • Easy and quickly repeatable
    • Processes are tied into Job Schedulers
    • No user downtime for planned outages
    • No disruption to the send and receive process production, and DR stays in sync during the Switch test
    • Supports heterogeneous environments
    • Create test/development environments on the fly
      ⇒ Simplify operating system/application upgrade testing efforts
      ⇒ Improve quality assurance testing

     

    Watch our IntellaFLASH™ Video to learn more

    Let’s Discuss Your Custom Solution Needs

    ContactUs@FocalPointSg.com

    Follow us on LinkedIn

    focalpointsg.com | 813.513.7402

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: Moving a Subsystem into its Own Shared Pool Don’t Depend on Arrival Sequence

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 15 Issue: 28

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • IBM Offers Low Financing Rates for System i5 Upgrade Leases
    • Server Virtualization Is Mainstream, Says Yankee Group
    • Sundry Summer Announcements for the System i5
    • Midrange IT Professionals Working Overtime, Bigtime
    • A Closer Look at the Economics of the Solution Edition for JDE
    • Attachmate Completes NetIQ Acquisition, Previews Vista Support
    • Time Sharing: An Old Concept That’s Still With Us
    • JDA Completes Manugistics Deal, Warns of Weaker Second Quarter Results
    • As I See It: The Donking Life
    • Freescale Claims Breakthrough in MRAM Memory

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • COMMON Set for First Annual Conference in Three Years
    • API Operations Management for Safe, Powerful, and High Performance APIs
    • What’s New in IBM i Services and Networking
    • Four Hundred Monitor, May 18
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 24, Number 20
    • IBM i 7.3 TR12: The Non-TR Tech Refresh
    • IBM i Integration Elevates Operational Query and Analytics
    • Simplified IBM i Stack Bundling Ahead Of Subscription Pricing
    • More Price Hikes From IBM, Now For High End Storage
    • Big Blue Readies Power10 And IBM i 7.5 Training for Partners

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2022 IT Jungle

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.