• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • IT Shops Expect iSCSI and Fibre Channel to Co-Exist

    July 31, 2006 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    If you look at the history of network connectivity, what you will see is that any protocol that comes up against Ethernet, no matter how good it might be initially, eventually succumbs to Ethernet and is supplanted. But that may not be the case until someone creates something I will call iFC, which is short for Internet Fibre Channel. Let me explain.

    A few examples illustrate the point. In many ways, IBM Token Ring was technically a better protocol, offering higher bandwidth, better error correction. So what? In the long run, Ethernet improved, and because non-IBM shops–like the service providers who were responsible for building the Internet–chose Ethernet, that technology won. Similarly, InfiniBand was invented to create a switched fabric for connecting servers to storage and servers to each other, and it offered very high bandwidth and very low latency. But it never supplanted Fibre Channel light pipes between servers and storage, and as for system interconnections, so few vendors have come to market with InfiniBand products that they are relatively expensive and exotic, and Gigabit or 10 Gigabit Ethernet links are now popular at all but some of the largest supercomputing centers and for some clustered database implementations. And with the faster Ethernet links available today, Internet SCSI, or iSCSI, links to hook storage to servers is now giving Fibre Channel a run for the money.

    But, at least according to the sentiments expressed in a survey of storage buyers done by Xiotech, a maker of storage area network (SAN) arrays for Windows, Linux, and Unix servers called the Magnitude 3D, it looks like Fibre Channel and iSCSI will co-exist for quite some time yet. Xiotech put together a survey, which got 110 responses, asking companies about their iSCSI and Fibre Channel plans. (I think 110 responses is kind of meager, but it is also typical of such surveys, so take the results as you will.)

    The respondents in the survey said that while they expected iSCSI to increase from about 5 percent of their storage connectivity today to 19 percent two years from now, they also said that Fibre Channel would grow from 34 percent of their current storage connectivity today to reach 41 percent within that two-year span. Survey respondents said they would be less dependent on direct-attached storage two years from now, dropping from about the storage connectivity they have today (and dominated by SCSI links) to about a quarter of storage links.

    iSCSI is a less expensive storage connectivity option right now, but on the typical Gigabit Ethernet networks it is used on, it also offers much lower performance than the 2 Gb/sec or 4 Gb/sec Fibre Channel links available today for SANs. So it is no surprise that survey respondents gave Fibre Channel a rating of 4.49 on a scale of 5 for performance, compared to 3.55 for iSCSI, and a rating of 4.35 for reliability and 4.16 for security, versus ratings of 3.49 and 3.41 for these same technological aspects for iSCSI. iSCSI got high marks for initial low price, with a rating of 3.55, versus 2.52 for Fibre Channel.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 15, Number 30 -- July 31, 2006

    Sponsored by
    Raz-Lee Security

    Start your Road to Zero Trust!

    Firewall Network security, controlling Exit Points, Open DB’s and SSH. Rule Wizards and graphical BI.

    Request Demo

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: Automatic Ways to Assign Group Authorities to an Object Print PC Documents to iSeries Printers

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 15 Issue: 30

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Everybody Loves SOA, Aberdeen Survey Says
    • The Blogosphere Says the IRS Uses the iSeries to Manage Bill Gates’ Personal Taxes
    • Logility’s Sales Rocket Skyward in Fiscal Q4
    • Lawson Reports Preliminary Q4 Results, Loses CFO, and Buys CAS
    • IT Shops Expect iSCSI and Fibre Channel to Co-Exist
    • Everybody Loves SOA, Aberdeen Survey Says
    • Agilysys Blames Fiscal Q1 Sales Weakness on IBM ‘Proprietary Servers’
    • As I See It: Productivity and Relationship
    • New Vendors Join SOA Collaboration Group
    • IBM Creates a Performance-Based Pricing Scheme for Software

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Public Preview For Watson Code Assistant for i Available Soon
    • COMMON Youth Movement Continues at POWERUp 2025
    • IBM Preserves Memory Investments Across Power10 And Power11
    • Eradani Uses AI For New EDI And API Service
    • Picking Apart IBM’s $150 Billion In US Manufacturing And R&D
    • FAX/400 And CICS For i Are Dead. What Will IBM Kill Next?
    • Fresche Overhauls X-Analysis With Web UI, AI Smarts
    • Is It Time To Add The Rust Programming Language To IBM i?
    • Is IBM Going To Raise Prices On Power10 Expert Care?
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 20

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle