• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Symantec Survey Says DR Planning and Testing Are Inadequate

    October 29, 2007 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    It’s a story you hear over and over again in the data center. Disaster recovery plans are only as good as the changes you make after you test the plan and see that it fails. According to a study performed by Symantec, which sells the Veritas stack of file systems and related tools used in clustered Unix, Windows, and Linux environments, IT departments have some work to do on their disaster recovery plans.

    The Symantec study indicates that 91 percent of the IT organizations polled that have disaster recovery plans carry out full scenario testing of those plans, but when they run the test scenarios, the plans fail in some significant way about half the time. The Symantec study shows that 48 percent of the companies polled have had to implement their disaster recovery plans. Some 77 percent of CEOs apparently do not show up for DR planning committee meetings, either, which doesn’t help motivate organizations to take DR seriously.

    Symantec did not present any disaster occurrence frequency for companies with DR plans, which is odd, but did say that 44 percent of the companies that said they had no DR plan have had a disaster hit them, 26 percent said they had it happen two or more times, and 11 percent said they were affected three or more times.

    In terms of what drives IT managers to do DR planning, 69 percent said natural disasters were the primary reason, followed by computer virus and malware attack (57 percent of respondents), and war or terrorism (31 percent of respondents).

    “IT executives are taking a fresh, hard look at their disaster recovery and business continuity strategies,” explains Sean Derrington, director of storage management product marketing at Symantec. “To protect against downtime, organizations must implement high availability and disaster recovery across their enterprise environments. They must also maintain procedures for non-disruptive disaster recovery testing that continually evaluate the effectiveness of their disaster recovery strategy without impacting the production environment.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Midrange Shops Get Disaster Recovery Services from IBM

    Admin Alert: The System i High Availability Roadmap

    Online Backup and Recovery Goes Virtual

    Disaster Recovery in a Truck Unveiled by IBM, Cisco



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 16, Number 42 -- October 29, 2007

    Sponsored by
    Lightedge

    Your IBM Power Cloud Strategy Should Start With “Why?”

    Moving IBM i to the cloud isn’t just an infrastructure decision.

    A hardware refresh, data center exit, IBM i skills gap, disaster recovery requirement, or broader cloud initiative can each lead to a very different architecture.

    At Lightedge, we start by understanding what you’re trying to accomplish. Then we look at the workload, application dependencies, resiliency requirements, operating model, and long-term strategy to determine where that workload belongs.

    Managed IBM Power cloud? IBM Power Virtual Server? DR in the cloud? A hybrid architecture connecting IBM Power with AWS or Azure?

    There isn’t one right answer for every IBM i environment.

    Start with the business requirement. Understand the workload. Then decide where it belongs.

    Explore IBM Power cloud, managed services, and hybrid solutions from Lightedge.

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    SAP Boosts Sales and Profits in the Third Quarter IBM’s Math on User-Priced System i Versus Vintage Machines

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 16 Issue: 42

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • GST Offers Blow-Out Pricing on System i Features
    • Symantec Survey Says DR Planning and Testing Are Inadequate
    • SAP Boosts Sales and Profits in the Third Quarter
    • SPEC Launches Java Messaging Benchmark
    • CCSS Inks Distribution Deal in Nordic Region
    • GST Offers Blow-Out Pricing on System i Features
    • Gartner Says CIOs Will Be Measured on IT and Business Agility
    • As I See It: Survey Says . . .
    • Ask TPM: Two System i Questions, and Two Responses
    • Midrange Shops Get Disaster Recovery Services from IBM

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Will Power Chips Get A Converged Arm Instruction Set Like Z Mainframe CPUs?
    • Thinking About Moving IBM i To The Cloud? Don’t Start With The Quote
    • Precisely To Add Ransomware Protection In MIMIX 11
    • It’s D-Day For Cybersecurity, AI Firms Warn
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 30
    • Oracle Dips A Toe Into IBM’s EBCDIC World
    • When Your Small IBM i Team Is Really A Team Of One
    • Guru: Putting Failure Handling In Its Place
    • Inside The Security Enhancements In ACS
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 28: A Crazy Number of Security Vulnerability Patches

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle