• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • IT Vendor Market Cap Follies

    November 5, 2007 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    The world is a funny place. Funny in terms of “ha ha” as well as in funny as “downright strange.” Someone sent me an email last week, laughing because the market capitalization of Apple Computer had surpassed that of IBM.

    Market cap–the value of all of the shares outstanding in public companies as reckoned by the price of shares on Wall Street–is as good a measure as any about what the world thinks of that company. But considering the amount of flim-flam and nonsense in people’s reasons for valuing companies–well, at least some of the time–maybe market cap goes too far sometimes.

    To get a sense of reality, I like to gauge the market cap of any IT company against its annual earnings. If the company is healthy, growing, and profitable, the ratio should be well above one; if it falls below one, you are either a giant retailer hitting up against some limits (like Wal-Mart is), or you are a struggling manufacturer in the North American or European markets (as General Motors is). Check out this table below for your amusement.

    Market Annual
    Company Cap Revenue Ratio
    IBM $156.6 B $91.4 B 1.71
    HP $132.8 B $91.7 B 1.45
    Microsoft $346.7 B $51.1 B 6.78
    Intel $154.8 B $35.4 B 4.37
    Apple $163.5 B $24.0 B 6.81
    Sun Microsystems $18.6 B $13.9 B 1.34
    Dell $66.4 B $57.4 B 1.16
    Google $219.5 B $15.0 B 14.63
    Yahoo $40.5 B $6.4 B 6.33
    eBay $47.4 B $6.0 B 7.90
    Amazon $36.4 B $10.7 B 3.40
    General Motors $21.1 B $207.3 B 0.10
    Wal-Mart $179.1 B $348.7 B 0.51
    Berkshire Hathaway $203.1 B $98.5 B 2.06

    It just cracks me up that General Motors, with over $207.3 billion in sales in its last annual report, has a market cap of a mere $21.1 billion. That’s just crazy. And I also think it is perfectly insane that Google, with $15 billion in sales in its past 12 months, now has a market cap of $219.5 billion–a ratio of nearly 15 to 1 against revenues. All the profits generated by the S&P 500 for the past several decades does not justify such a multiple, but if you bought Google at $200 bucks a share and you are sitting at it at north of $700 a share, you are feeling pretty smug about right now. Microsoft‘s multiple is high, but that is because it has 1.5 monopolies–one on the desktop and half a one in the data center–which means it can profit as if it were a $200 billion company even though its latest annual sales are only just above $51 billion in its latest fiscal year. It also seems ridiculous as well as ironic that Google is now worth more than Berkshire Hathaway, the financial empire built by Warren Buffett, a friend of Bill (Gates that is, not Clinton) who is often vying with him as richest man in the world and who has donated his riches to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to do some good in the world.

    That Apple has a multiple in the same range as Microsoft just goes to show that Steve Jobs is just as smart as Bill Gates, but he didn’t start with a monopoly. But, if the iPod is any indicator, he may end up with one. (My wife just got me an iPod Nano, which I have resisted plugging in until this newsletter is completely written.) Intel is under competitive pressure from Advanced Micro Devices, and even though its fortunes have recovered in recent quarters, its market cap to revenue ratio shows the pressure, since Intel used to be valued right up there with Microsoft only a few years ago. It also shows that hardware doesn’t drive profits the same way it used to, and software still does. Again, Gates got the better part of the Wintel duopoly. Which is no surprise, now is it?



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 16, Number 43 -- November 5, 2007

    Sponsored by
    LaserVault

    Integrate Virtual Tape to Automate Your Backups And Strengthen Your Ability To Recover From Cyber Attacks And Disasters

    With most IT departments stretched thin, finding something that can quickly free up IT time is definitely a bonus. That’s why it’s important to stop and take a look at integrating virtual tape into your backup and recovery. Virtual tape is one of those technologies where once you have it, you’ll wonder why you didn’t do it sooner. See a demo and get a $50 gift card.

    But what is it about using virtual tape that makes it so worthwhile? Why is it that so many IBM i shops are already using or considering using virtual tape for all or part of their backup and recovery systems?

    Virtual tape and virtual tape libraries offer a way to both simplify and strengthen backup and recovery operations. By incorporating virtual tape technology, automation of backups becomes possible resulting in hundreds of hours saved annually for IT departments and personnel.

    “We needed to find a replacement that would lower the maintenance cost and reduce complexity of our backup and recovery functions without a major disruption to our operations.” David Fray, Director of Enterprise Systems, ABC Financial

    LaserVault ViTL is a virtual tape and tape library solution developed specifically for use with IBM Power Systems (from AS/400 to iSeries to Power 9s). With ViTL you can:

    • Replace physical tape and tape libraries and eliminate associated delays
    • Automate backup operations, including the ability to purge or archive backups
    • Remotely manage your backups – no need to be onsite with your server
    • Save backups to a dedupe appliance and the cloud
    • Recover your data at lightspeed greatly improving your ability to recover from cyberattacks
    • And so much more

    Sign-up now to see a ViTL online demo and get a $50 Amazon e-gift card when the demo is complete as our way of saying thanks for your time. Plus when you sign-up you’ll receive a free facts comparison sheet on using virtual tape vs tape so you can compare the functionality for yourself.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: Limiting System i User Sign-ons the Smart Way XAware Takes the Open Source Plunge

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 16 Issue: 43

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • IBM to Recycle Silicon Wafers for Solar Cells
    • The System i Still Owns the SAP BI Data Mart Benchmark
    • IBM Brags About Its Power6 Server Shipments
    • IBM to Pump $1.5 Billion into Security Products, Services
    • Neuwing, IBM to Quantify and Monetize IT Energy Savings
    • IT Vendor Market Cap Follies
    • Ask TPM: Enticing Users to Upgrade Their i5/OS Hardware
    • BluePhoenix Rides Legacy Modernization to Another Successful Quarter
    • Project ECLipz Surfaces, But Not the Way You Think
    • The Latest i5/OS V5R4 PTFs: What Is Going On?

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • IBM Mulls Using DataMigrator as Cloud Warehouse Pipeline
    • PowerTech AV Automatically Detects Ransomware Activity
    • Infor Puts CM3 Project On Hold
    • Four Hundred Monitor, June 29
    • Guild Mortgage Takes The 20-Year Option For Modernization
    • IBM i Licensing, Part 3: Can The Hardware Bundle Be Cheaper Than A Smartphone?
    • Guru: The Finer Points of Exit Points
    • Big Blue Tweaks IBM i Pricing Ahead Of Subscription Model
    • We Still Want IBM i On The Impending Power E1050
    • DRV Brings More Automation to IBM i Message Monitoring

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2022 IT Jungle

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.