• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • ON vs. ON

    November 28, 2007 Hey, Professional

    In ON vs. WHERE, I demonstrated that an outer join yields different results depending on whether you place a selection expression in the ON clause or the WHERE clause for a secondary file. Now I want to follow up on that tip by looking at the difference between the ON and WHERE clauses for a primary table.

    Here’s the invoicing data I used in the previous tip. We have header information:

    SELECT H.* FROM INVHDR AS H
    
    Invoice  Company   Customer      Date
    47566      1           44     2004-05-03
    47567      2            5     2004-05-03
    47568      1        10001     2004-05-03
    47569      7          777     2004-05-03
    47570      7          777     2004-05-04
    47571      2            5     2004-05-04
    

    And we have related details:

    SELECT D.* FROM INVDTL AS D
    
    Invoice   Line   Item      Price  Quantity
    47566      1     AB1441    25.00      3
    47566      2     JJ9999    20.00      4
    47567      1     DN0120      .35    800
    47569      1     DC2984    12.50      2
    47570      1     MI8830      .10     10
    47570      2     AB1441    24.00    100
    47571      1     AJ7644    15.00      1
    

    Notice that the following query contains a selection expression in the WHERE clause:

    SELECT H.INVOICE, H.COMPANY, H.CUSTNBR, H.INVDATE,
           D.LINE, D.ITEM, D.QTY                      
      FROM INVHDR AS H                                
      LEFT JOIN INVDTL AS D                           
        ON H.INVOICE = D.INVOICE                      
     WHERE H.COMPANY = 1                              
    
    Invoice Company Customer   Date     Line  Item   Quantity
    47566       1       44   2004-05-03   1   AB1441     3 
    47566       1       44   2004-05-03   2   JJ9999     4 
    47568       1    10001   2004-05-03   -   -          -
    

    The result set includes data for company one invoices only. Watch what happens if I move the selection expression to the ON clause:

    SELECT H.INVOICE, H.COMPANY, H.CUSTNBR, H.INVDATE,
           D.LINE, D.ITEM, D.QTY                      
      FROM INVHDR AS H                                
      LEFT JOIN INVDTL AS D                           
        ON H.INVOICE = D.INVOICE                      
       AND H.COMPANY = 1
    
    Invoice Company Customer   Date     Line  Item   Quantity
    47566       1       44   2004-05-03   1   AB1441     3  
    47566       1       44   2004-05-03   2   JJ9999     4  
    47567       2        5   2004-05-03   -   -          - 
    47568       1    10001   2004-05-03   -   -          - 
    47569       7      777   2004-05-03   -   -          - 
    47570       7      777   2004-05-04   -   -          - 
    47571       2        5   2004-05-04   -   -          -
    

    This query differs from the previous one in that all invoice headers are in the resulting table, not just those for company number one. Notice that details are null for other companies, even though some of those invoices have corresponding rows in the details file. What’s going on?

    Here’s the difference. When a selection expression is placed in the WHERE clause, the resulting table is created. Then the filter is applied to select the rows that are to be returned in the result set. When a selection expression is placed in the ON clause of an outer join, the selection expression limits the rows that will take part in the join, but for a primary table, the selection expression does not limit the rows that will be placed in the result set. In this case, all header rows are placed in the result set, but only company one header rows are allowed to join to the details.

    Contrast the use of an expression involving a field of the primary file with the use of an expression involving a field of the secondary file. Here’s a query from the previous article. The ON clause refers to the item number, which is stored in the secondary file:

    SELECT H.INVOICE, H.COMPANY, H.CUSTNBR, H.INVDATE,
           D.LINE, D.ITEM, D.QTY                      
      FROM INVHDR AS H                                
      LEFT JOIN INVDTL AS D                           
        ON H.INVOICE = D.INVOICE                      
       AND D.ITEM = 'AB1441'                          
    
    47566       1         44   2004-05-03     1   AB1441     3  
    47567       2          5   2004-05-03      -  -           - 
    47568       1      10001   2004-05-03      -  -           - 
    47569       7        777   2004-05-03      -  -           - 
    47570       7        777   2004-05-04     2   AB1441   100  
    47571       2          5   2004-05-04      -  -           -
    

    A selection expression in the ON clause does not behave identically for primary and secondary tables in an outer join. In both cases, ON restricts the rows that are allowed to participate in the join. However, all rows from the primary file, but not all secondary rows, are returned through the result set.

    –Ted

    RELATED STORY

    ON vs. WHERE



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    FalconStor

    Simplify Secure Offsite Data Protection for IBM Power with FalconStor Habanero™

    IBM i teams are under growing pressure to ensure data is protected, recoverable, and compliant—without adding complexity or disrupting stable environments.

    FalconStor Habanero™ provides secure, fully managed offsite data protection purpose-built for IBM Power. It integrates directly with existing IBM i backup tools and processes, enabling reliable offsite copies without new infrastructure, workflow changes, or added operational overhead.

    By delivering and managing the service end-to-end, FalconStor helps organizations strengthen cyber resilience, improve disaster recovery readiness, and meet compliance requirements with confidence. Offsite copies are securely maintained and available when needed, supporting recovery, audits, and business continuity.

    FalconStor Habanero offers a straightforward way to modernize offsite data protection for IBM i: focused on simplicity, reliability, and resilience.

    Learn More

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Sponsored Links

    RJS Software Systems:  Make your office paperless with WebDocs
    COMMON:  Join us at the annual 2008 conference, March 30 - April 3, in Nashville, Tennessee
    LANSA:  Hear how System i shops achieved modernization with RAMP

    IT Jungle Store Top Book Picks

    The System i RPG & RPG IV Tutorial and Lab Exercises: List Price, $59.95
    The System i Pocket RPG & RPG IV Guide: List Price, $69.95
    The iSeries Pocket Database Guide: List Price, $59.00
    The iSeries Pocket Developers' Guide: List Price, $59.00
    The iSeries Pocket SQL Guide: List Price, $59.00
    The iSeries Pocket Query Guide: List Price, $49.00
    The iSeries Pocket WebFacing Primer: List Price, $39.00
    Migrating to WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
    iSeries Express Web Implementer's Guide: List Price, $59.00
    Getting Started with WebSphere Development Studio for iSeries: List Price, $79.95
    Getting Started With WebSphere Development Studio Client for iSeries: List Price, $89.00
    Getting Started with WebSphere Express for iSeries: List Price, $49.00
    WebFacing Application Design and Development Guide: List Price, $55.00
    Can the AS/400 Survive IBM?: List Price, $49.00
    The All-Everything Machine: List Price, $29.95
    Chip Wars: List Price, $29.95

    System i Developers and .NET 2.0, Part 2: Web Development Using ASP.NET AJAX Admin Alert: Basic Tools for the System i Admin Tool Chest

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 7, Number 41 -- November 28, 2007
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

ProData Computer Services
Help/Systems
Guild Companies

Table of Contents

  • System i Developers and .NET 2.0, Part 2: Web Development Using ASP.NET AJAX
  • ON vs. ON
  • Admin Alert: Basic Tools for the System i Admin Tool Chest

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Q&A With IBM’s New GM Of Power, Hillery Hunter
  • When IBM i Skills Become A Resilience Risk
  • Guru: Load A Varying-Dimension Array With One SQL Fetch
  • You Have To Speak IBM’s Language If You Want To Be Heard
  • Raz-Lee Revs iSecurity Suite With 2026 Updates
  • The Big Easy: Connecting The Dots On Big Blue’s AI Strategy For IBM i
  • From Migration To Maturity: The Cloud Reality For IBM i Shops
  • COMMON Dances To A Fresh New Tune In New Orleans
  • Eradani Touts Native Git Connection As AI Tools Spread
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 17

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle