• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • AMR Says Companies Spend Big on SOA Software

    March 17, 2008 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    IT vendors haven’t had something so exciting to salivate over and rub their hands about since the advent of Java more than a decade ago. Every new layer of abstraction in the information technology sprawl always leads to more flexibility, but it usually also comes at a price: more iron, and more software and services expenses. The question that IT vendors are wondering about now is will service oriented architecture, a means of leaving legacy applications and databases in place and then extending them with a new abstraction layer of services, be the money pot they all act like it will be.

    To try to get a handle on what companies are really spending on SOA projects, AMR Research did a survey of a bunch of companies engaged in SOA efforts, ranging in size from 500 to 10,000 or more employees. The companies were from a variety of industries, including process and discrete manufacturing, retail and wholesale distribution, telecommunications, and financial services. Companies located in the United States, Germany, and China were chosen as representative of the global economy, and 53 percent of the companies polled in those regions had SOA projects underway by the end of 2007.

    And lo and behold, this early in the SOA adoption cycle, there is no consistent pattern across industries, geography, or company size in terms of SOA project spending. Such was the way with the adoption of Internet-style computing technologies more than a decade ago, of course, when some new, small companies did a lot of investing as did some very large, established companies, with others just spending a little. But eventually a new, pervasive software technology becomes normal and spending patterns start to follow company size and employee counts and diverge based on industries.

    But that is certainly not so for SOA today, says Ian Finley, research director at AMR Research. “SOA adoption and interest varied by industry in some surprising ways,” says Finley. “Financial services, the top revenue vertical reported in vendor interviews, came in at the bottom in our SOA adoption tally. Upon further analysis, we discovered that while a smaller percentage of financial services companies have adopted SOA, those adopters are spending a great deal more on SOA than their peers in other industries. In other sectors, more of the industry has adopted SOA, but the average company spends a more modest amount.”

    Across all of the companies surveyed by AMR Research for its SOA Spending Report 2007-2008, the average company spent $1.4 million for software and services related to SOA. Survey respondents who are making SOA investments are more than doubling their spending each year, and 45 percent of those polled said they spent over $500,000 on projects. These numbers suggest some big companies are spending many millions of dollars on projects, thereby raising the class average.

    The main reasons companies were investing in SOA was to more quickly and economically change their applications, and to do so with less risk–a reason cited by 22 percent of respondents. Another 18 percent said that the SOA approach was specifically required by management for a development project (without elaborating the reason behind the decision) and another 17 percent said SOA projects were driven by the desire to reduce IT costs through the reuse of software components (how this is different from the first category is beyond me).

    RELATED STORIES

    SOA Remains Hard to Define, but Projects on the Rise

    IBM Adds Web Services and SOA Tools to the System i

    System i and the Web: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going

    IBM Repositions the Mainframe as Central to SOA

    iSeries ISVs React to SOA Standardization Initiative

    SOA: A Life-Line for the iSeries?



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 11 -- March 17, 2008

    Sponsored by
    JAMS Software

    One Scheduler. IBM i, Windows, Linux, and More.

    IBM i teams trust JAMS to schedule and orchestrate jobs across every platform in their environment. Centralized visibility, cross-platform dependency management, and alerts that reach the right person before the business feels it.

    Fewer than 5% of IBM i shops run IBM i only. The rest are managing cross-platform dependencies — often without a clear picture of how they connect. JAMS draws that map, enforces those dependencies automatically, and gives your team a single place to monitor, manage, and recover when something goes wrong.

    If you are running hundreds of CL scripts and custom RPG processes, bring them as-is. JAMS runs them exactly as they do today — except now they are visible, monitored, and part of an orchestrated workflow instead of scattered across folders only one person knows about.

    No consumption-based pricing. No surprise bills when your workload spikes. You pay based on how many machines JAMS talks to — that’s it.

    Learn More → https://jamsscheduler.com/lp/ibm-i

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    IBM Rejiggers System i and BladeCenter Deal One More Time Mainline and BPO Partner to Offer Managed Hosting and Co-Location

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 11

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Bye Bye System p and i, Hello Power Systems
    • The HP Pitch on Rehosting i5/OS Applications on Integrity
    • NetManage and Rocket Software Call Off Acquisition Deal
    • As I See It: Bringing the Funny
    • HPC Sales Account for Most of 2007’s Server Sales Growth
    • Reader Feedback on IBM and IT Jungle’s Four Hundred Stack
    • TFH Flashback: Assault, Battery Not Included
    • IBM Rejiggers System i and BladeCenter Deal One More Time
    • AMR Says Companies Spend Big on SOA Software
    • Mainline and BPO Partner to Offer Managed Hosting and Co-Location

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Inside The Encryption Key Management Changes In IBM i 7.6
    • FalconStor Moved To The Blue Lagoon, And Is Poised For Growth Because Of It
    • Guru: Claude’s SQL Tip
    • Astera Makes Extracting Legacy Report Data an AI Specialty
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 27
    • Welcoming The New IBM i Chief Architect And Other New Top Brass
    • A Deep Dive Into That Power S1112 Entry Power11 Server
    • Guru: Beyond Three-Part Naming – Running SQL Across Remote IBM i Systems
    • How IBM Bolstered IBM i Resilience In The Summer Tech Refreshes
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 26

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle