• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • IBM Really, Really Doesn’t Want Sun

    April 20, 2009 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    This is getting ridiculous. Well, maybe it was ridiculous from the beginning. Anyway, the latest reports are that server and operating system maker Sun Microsystems was, as of the end of last week, still interested in renewing acquisition talks with IBM. However, Big Blue has, according to sources, lost interest. Again.

    Bloomberg reported on late Wednesday (April 15) that people familiar with the situation said that Sun was still interested in selling itself to Big Blue, but it was sticking to its line that IBM had to assure Sun’s board of directors that it would commit to the deal and see it through various antitrust regulators. The ghost of antitrust lawsuits with the U.S. Department of Justice, and consent decrees that IBM signed in 1956 and amended in 1969 to govern its behavior, seem to be haunting Big Blue.

    And rightly so. The very governments that will be looking at the deal are big users of IBM mainframes and Unix iron from Sun, and if there is only one guy controlling those two platforms, competition will cease. Right now, only the high-end Unix server market puts any competitive pressure–albeit somewhat indirectly–on the mainframe market. And it would not be surprising to see very big mainframe and Unix shops get involved if IBM tries to do the deal. Perhaps with a lawsuit arguing over the establishment of the relevant market for determining with IBM would have a monopoly in high-end servers and therefore be subject to regulation again.

    A decade ago, IBM was able to argue that the relevant market for mainframes and AS/400s was the server market at large, even though we all know that IBM has a monopoly on both platforms and customers have legacy lock-in that gives IBM great sway over prices and profits from these products. There is no law against a monopoly, but monopolies are regulated, and that usually means lower profits. So if IBM thinks a Sun deal might revive scrutiny of the System z and Power Systems and their relevant market, you can understand why the company is reacting to Sun as if it had just stepped on a rattlesnake snake. It is not, I am convinced, about the money that IBM is willing to pay for Sun (just shy of $7 billion), but rather the profits that are at stake and the possible effects on profits that a Sun acquisition will have if someone sues to block the deal, and some bureaucrat or judge decides IBM charges too much for mainframe and Power Systems hardware and software.

    I don’t spend my day listening to the squawking and raving on CBNC, but I do read the newswires religiously, and Reuters reported on Thursday morning (April 16) that sources told CNBC that IBM is no longer interested in buying Sun precisely because of the increased legal scrutiny the deal would face. Sun apparently asked IBM to come back to the bargaining table earlier last week, but regulatory agencies told Big Blue, according to these sources, that the deal might take six to nine months to get regulatory approval.

    And that would mean not only that Sun’s business would stall, affecting its value and its revenue stream, but that IBM would have to provide regulators with lots of detailed sales and market share data for its server and operating system businesses to prove that the Sun acquisition would not damage competition. Which is, of course, perfectly idiotic. Of course IBM buying Sun would lessen competition. But, then again, so does a Sun that is being run by Wall Street and some private equity firms, too. So that is not a test of anything, ultimately, except the problem with being a public company when you are trying to make big transitions and ride out a bad economy at the same time, as Sun is trying to do.

    As far as I know, no one has formally asked Eric Holder, the attorney general in the Obama Administration, or Scott Hammond, acting assistant attorney general in charge of the department’s Antitrust Division, what they think about a tie-up between Sun and IBM. But as you can see from a listing of Hammond’s speeches over the years during his tenure at the DoJ, he is not too keen on cartels and he is big on criminal enforcement of rulings relating to antitrust matters.

    RELATED STORIES

    The IBM-Sun Saga Continues–Or Rather, Doesn’t

    IBM Poised to Buy Sun, Rumors Say

    Wall Street Makes IBM, Sun Strange Bedfellows?



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 18, Number 15 -- April 20, 2009

    Sponsored by
    ARCAD Software

    [Webinar Series] Demystifying DevOps on the IBM i

    Join us for this 3-Part Roundtable Webinar Series, where ARCAD experts will demystify the move to Git and an automated process with options that work for everyone!

    This Series will be an engaging discussion on key DevOps topics as Git, Builds, Automation and much more.

    Part 2: Branching & Building (Thursday, February 9th, at 12:00PM ET / 9:00AM PT)

    During this 2nd session, we will discuss Feature/Release and Branch Management and building the branches with tools like Bob and ARCAD.

    Part 3: DevOps – Automated Workflow (Thursday, February 23rd, at 12:00PM ET / 9:00AM PT)

    During this 3rd session, we will discuss what can be automated in the IBM i DevOps process starting from the build to other steps in your workflow.  We’ll discuss pipeline tools like Jenkins and the new automation features of Git packages.

    Register NOW

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: And /QOpenSys and /QOpenSys and /QOpenSys and. . . Nimsoft Delivers Business View of IT with BSM Express

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 18 Issue: 15

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • The State of PHP on the Power Systems i
    • IBM Tweaks Some i Deals, Nukes Some Old i Tools
    • Come On Out, Power6+, You Win
    • As I See It: Berry Berry Annoying
    • First Quarter Sees Largest Tech Job Losses Since 2002
    • IBM Really, Really Doesn’t Want Sun
    • Lawson Sways BPCS Consultancy to M3’s Reseller Rolls
    • IBM and Chip Partners Plot Course for 28 Nanometer Designs
    • Economic Stimulus Programs Put IT Under the Microscope
    • IBM Expands SOA Marketing With Partners in Mind

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Power Systems Did Indeed Grow Revenues Last Year
    • The IBM Power Trap: Three Mistakes That Leave You Stuck
    • Big Blue Decrees Its 2023 IBM Champions
    • As I See It: The Good, the Bad, And The Mistaken
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 5
    • N2i Gains Traction Among IBM i Newbies
    • Realizing The Promise Of Cross Platform Development With VS Code
    • 2023 IBM i Predictions, Part 3
    • Four Hundred Monitor, January 25
    • Join The 2023 IBM i Marketplace Survey Webinar Tomorrow

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2022 IT Jungle

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.