• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Sun Shareholders Vote to Sell to Oracle

    July 20, 2009 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    The deed is done, the die is cast, and unless the antitrust regulators in the United States or Europe throw a spanner in the works, the deal is going to be signed on the dotted line. I am referring, of course, to software powerhouse Oracle‘s $5.6 billion acquisition of server, storage, and operating system maker Sun Microsystems.

    Last Thursday morning, shareholders of Sun gathered in its Santa Clara, California, headquarters and voted on the proposed acquisition of Sun by Oracle. And 62 percent of the aggregate shares were tendered in favor of the deal, which means that Oracle, once it gets regulatory approval, will be a server and storage company with the Solaris 10 Unix operating system and the Java programming language and runtime environment to tend to. The vote was not exactly unanimous, and clearly some people wanted to hold out for a better deal. There isn’t going to be a better deal, not with Sun’s revenues down by around a third in the quarter ended in June and very little prospect for growth until the Oracle deal is signed and completed, possibly by the end of the summer.

    Oracle’s top brass has been trying to convince Sun’s customers that it is committed to the Sparc processor and Sun’s server and storage hardware businesses, but there are plenty of people who just don’t believe it. They don’t believe that a vendor that is used to the high-margin software business is going to actually invest the resources in a lower-margin hardware business. Oracle’s co-president, Charles Phillips, talked about how Oracle created an integrated system, akin to IBM’s AS/400, with a complete stack of hardware and software that is easier and cheaper for the company to support than a matrix of possible combinations of server hardware, operating systems, middleware, and application software. While it is possible that Oracle may indeed do this with a Solaris platform, and perhaps even one based on Sparc processors, there has been nothing stopping Oracle from doing this all these years, and it has not been tempted to create an Oracle version of the AS/400.

    Of course, as I pointed out in an article over at The Register entitled Moon Macrosystems: How to build a better Sun (Go ahead. Take a crack at it), there is nothing stopping any of us from doing the same thing with Sun’s software stack, considering that it is all open source at this point. Exactly what Oracle is paying money for is unclear. It could have merely taken the code, spent $1 billion on building a Solaris practice, created X64-based Solaris System/500s or whatever you want to call them, and pocketed the rest of its cash.

    Silicon Valley is sometimes more about ego than anything else, I guess. The only way for Oracle’s Larry Ellison to feel like he is winning must be to see Sun’s Scott McNealy clearly feeling like his has lost.

    RELATED STORIES

    Jilted Sun Snapped Up by Oracle for Application Systems

    IBM Really, Really Doesn’t Want Sun

    The IBM-Sun Saga Continues–Or Rather, Doesn’t

    IBM Poised to Buy Sun, Rumors Say

    Wall Street Makes IBM, Sun Strange Bedfellows?



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 18, Number 27 -- July 20, 2009

    Sponsored by
    Raz-Lee Security

    Enhance general user productivity and provide System Admins and DBAs super-user level tools with iSecurity FileScope.

    FileScope has a simple, easy-to-manipulate user interface and does away with the need to program even a single line of code!

    In celebration of its 40th Anniversary,  Raz-Lee Security is offering a FREE one-year license.

    Request your FREE license now!

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    JDA Plots Course Forward for MMS, and–Surprise–It’s Java IBM Kills Secure Perspectives Tool

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 18 Issue: 27

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • Sundry Power Systems i Storage Announcements
    • Servers Slammed in IBM’s Second Quarter
    • IBM Sunsets More Power Systems Features
    • As I See It: Injured Wing
    • Fincham Rides Point for iManifest EMEA
    • IT Organizations Tuning Up Employee Recruitment Efforts
    • Sun Shareholders Vote to Sell to Oracle
    • IBM Cranks Out Power Systems i Redbooks
    • Criminal Enterprise or Legit Business? It Can Be Hard to Tell, Cisco Says
    • Pat Townsend Secure with New President

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • IBM i Development and Modernization is Getting A Fresche Start with Some Ground-Breaking Subscriptions
    • CloudSAFE And Focal Point Solutions Group Combine Services, Unify Brands
    • Guru: Partitioning Result Sets Using SQL
    • As I See It: Elusive Connections
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 47
    • AWS Inks Deal With Connectria To Have a Power Play
    • IBM i Shops Have Alternatives to Db2 Web Query
    • Eradani Lays Waste to API Payload Restrictions
    • Four Hundred Monitor, November 15
    • Old PHP and Other PASE Apps Break on IBM i 7.5

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2023 IT Jungle