• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Reader Feedback on Fractal Expressionism

    February 14, 2011 Victor

    I wonder what your relationship with Richard Taylor is? This is very old news and has no value of bringing it as new. The last anyone has heard from Taylor was 2005. Why did you conveniently leave out the fact that Taylor’s fractal analysis has been debunked years ago? I have seen several paintings that are clearly not by the hand of Jackson Pollock who passed his fractal test. Are you willing to put down $100 million for those paintings? And what are we going to do with some of the known works from Jackson Pollock that did not pass Taylor’s test? Burn them?

    You write: “Shortly thereafter, a number of organizations worldwide adopted Taylor’s method for authenticating works of art.” Please name one organization that has done so. Not too difficult, just one.

    Your article is filled with mistakes and only shows one side of the story. You seem to be good friends with Richard Taylor since you wrote this “a@#-kissing” article. When you talk to him, can you ask him why he has never gave up his test results for peer-review like every other respected scientist would do?

    If his science would really be so ground-breaking as you suggest, Mr. Taylor would be the leading Pollock expert in the world, very strange that we never heard from him again, after his science was debunked.

    I am sure you want to do your pal Taylor a little favor, maybe he is short on cash, but next time be a bit more correct. There is not one institution in the world who uses his science, he is not affiliated with the Pollock Krasner Foundation. And his “science” has never been used to authenticate a painting.

    Taylor is a nice guy who made a computer program that can recognize fractal patterns, but the conclusion he makes from his analysis is just as laughable as your article.

    –Jeff

    To answer your question: I have no relationship with Richard Taylor, I’ve never met the man. As I indicated, much of the information in the article came from a piece written by Taylor himself. If you’re suggesting he outright lied about everything, then your anger would be justified. But I don’t think that’s the case.

    In any event, I saw no reason to treat this like an investigative piece, nor to treat Taylor like a “hostile witness.”

    I’m sure his method would not be applicable in every instance with every artist, but apparently he got it right the case I cited, and his conclusions were supported by the Harvard pigment study. I don’t think Taylor ever aspired to become an art expert–he’s a physicist. I just found the crossover to be fascinating. For the moment, that’s all I can tell you.

    If you have further issues with Taylor, I encourage you to take them up with him.

    –Victor

    RELATED STORIES

    As I See It: Fractal Expressionism

    Google does fractals in HTML5–Take a break with Julia and Mandelbrot

    Benoit Mandelbrot, father of fractals, dies at 85–An interdimensional explorer



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    FalconStor

    Begin Your Journey to the Cloud with Hybrid Cloud Date Protection and Disaster Recovery

    FalconStor StorSafe optimizes and modernizes your IBM i on-premises and in the IBM Power Virtual Server Cloud

    FalconStor powers secure and encrypted IBM i backups on-premise and now, working with IBM, powers migration to the IBM PowerVS cloud and on-going backup to IBM cloud object storage.

    Now you can use the IBM PowerVS Cloud as your secure offsite copy and take advantage of a hybrid cloud architecture or you can migrate workloads – test & development or even production apps – to the Power VS Cloud with secure cloud-native backup, powered by FalconStor and proven IBM partners.

    Learn More

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    IBM Unveils Local Storage Option for Cloud-Based Backup Service TPS Delivers IBM i Version of MFT Solution

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 20, Number 6 -- February 14, 2011
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

ASNA
New Generation Software
Maxava
ManageEngine
WorksRight Software

Table of Contents

  • More Software Pricing Carrots for IBM i Shops
  • iSam Blue Predicts Falling HA Costs
  • When IT Attacks: Disasters of the Technology Kind
  • Mad Dog 21/21: The Daily Nothing
  • IBM Tweaks Power Systems Deals, Enables Encryption and Web Development
  • Reader Feedback on Fractal Expressionism
  • Ken Olsen, Midrange Giant, Dies at 84
  • Toronto Night School Plugged into IBM i LUG
  • 2011 IT Spending is on the Mend, Says ESG
  • Magic Software Shoots Skyward Again in Q4

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • To Comfort The Afflicted And Afflict The Comfortable
  • How FalconStor Is Reinventing Itself, And Why IBM Noticed
  • Guru: When Procedure Driven RPG Really Works
  • Vendors Fill In The Gaps With IBM’s New MFA Solution
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 27
  • With Power11, Power Systems “Go To Eleven”
  • With Subscription Price, IBM i P20 And P30 Tiers Get Bigger Bundles
  • Izzi Buys CNX, Eyes Valence Port To System Z
  • IBM i Shops “Attacking” Security Concerns, Study Shows
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 26

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle