• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Lessons from a Bad MSP Trip

    August 8, 2011 Dan Burger

    A few weeks ago, I wrote an article about hosted services in the IBM i market. Although there are many offerings, the only area where there’s a noticeable customer interest is in data backup and recovery. You can find plenty of vendors offering everything from exclusively backup to disaster recovery and high availability. Competition is good, but comparisons are not always easy. Services and prices vary and sometimes surprises are not pleasant.

    The perception of managed service providers is pretty good overall. There are many more companies that are pleased than those that believe they were mistreated. One of the mistreated companies came to my attention recently. It makes a good example of what can go wrong.

    I’ll mention no names and completely avoid the “he said, she said” can of worms. Doing so does not change the lesson to be learned. So how do you get the expected value from the agreed upon price?

    In the circumstance I was told about, the company was expecting to get a managed disaster recovery service. What it got was a lot of trouble: multiple backup losses that resulted in reseeding data on both iSeries and Windows servers. A lot of time and effort was expended, and in the end the contract with the managed service provider was canceled and the search for a new MSP began.

    I don’t know any more of the details of this failed project. But I’ll tell you what I think MSPs should deliver. They need to deliver project management skills. There needs to be continual communications on project status and especially on potential problems. A vendor who calls itself a managed service provider better be big on service.

    Buyers of a service better be sure the vendor they choose provides good service. The number of MSPs has expanded rapidly in the past few years. There will be a shakeout coming and a primary reason for some companies leaving this business will be an inability to provide service. Applying the bigger is better rule doesn’t substitute for getting references from companies of similar size and business requirements. It’s just as faulty to assume big vendors don’t do well in the small to midsize market.

    Buyers should also beware of basing decisions on the lowest price. Low prices can help quickly develop a customer base, but it can also indicate a vendor that is cutting corners on infrastructure and services. One of the price point issues to pay attention to is testing. A disaster recovery system has to be tested. Four times per year is a best practices standard. Companies that don’t test get bit the hardest when unplanned downtime comes calling. Some managed DR providers have a specified number of system tests built into their pricing. Others charge separately for each test and that is over and above the monthly contract price. Closely compare how vendors describe testing. There can be considerable differences. Anything less than a test that proves your business can run off a target machine is not indicating DR readiness.

    You have to solve a problem before you can talk about the value you attained.

    RELATED STORIES

    Hosted Services And Great Expectations

    Big Blue Doesn’t Compete Against i Cloud Backup Vendors

    I, Cloud-i-us

    SaaS Surfs the Cash Conservation Wave

    The SMB Channel Wants to Sell SaaS and Managed Services



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    Maxava

    Migrate IBM i with Confidence

    Tired of costly and risky migrations? Maxava Migrate Live minimizes disruption with seamless transitions. Upgrading to Power10 or cloud hosted system, Maxava has you covered!

    Learn More

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: A Starter Program to Find Damaged Objects in i OS 6.1.1 IBM’s Multi-Faceted Mobile Strategy

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 20, Number 27 -- August 8, 2011
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Maxava
PowerTech
Cosyn
VAULT400
RJS Software Systems

Table of Contents

  • Lean Mean Green Screens
  • IBM Uncorks RPG Open Access Trial Version
  • The OCEAN View: More Skills, Less Blame
  • Mad Dog 21/21: Debit And Taxis
  • Vision and Maxava Prep for November Trial
  • The IT Sector Creates Jobs In July, Boosting A Jittery and Jumpy Economy
  • Lessons from a Bad MSP Trip
  • COMMON Europe Updates Top Concerns i Budget Data
  • IBM Tweaks Rational Developer Prices, Adds New Power Systems UPS
  • The SAP App Giant Rises in Q2

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Big Blue Raises IBM i License Transfer Fees, Other Prices
  • Keep The IBM i Youth Movement Going With More Training, Better Tools
  • Remain Begins Migrating DevOps Tools To VS Code
  • IBM Readies LTO-10 Tape Drives And Libraries
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 23
  • SEU’s Fate, An IBM i V8, And The Odds Of A Power13
  • Tandberg Bankruptcy Leaves A Hole In IBM Power Storage
  • RPG Code Generation And The Agentic Future Of IBM i
  • A Bunch Of IBM i-Power Systems Things To Be Aware Of
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Numbers 21 And 22

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle