• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Cisco And EMC Chase Midrange Customers With Smaller Converged Systems

    February 25, 2013 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    IBM is not the only one chasing midrange shops with converged systems. Last week, the Virtual Computer Environment partnership between Cisco Systems and EMC rolled out a new line of Vblock converged systems that the companies hope with help is radically expand its channel and then its customer base.

    The VCE partnership, which also includes server virtualization juggernaut VMware (which is majority-owned by EMC and therefore no matter what anyone says, this is still an EMC-Cisco partnership), stacks up Cisco’s C Series rack servers and Catalyst 3750-X switches, EMC’s VNXe 3150 disk arrays, VMware’s vSphere Enterprise Plus server virtualization stack, including its ESXi 5.1 hypervisor, and the Nexus 1000V virtual switch for that hypervisor into a half-rack setup that can run from 50 to 200 virtual machines. That Vblock System 100 has three to eight two-socket C220 M3 two-socket rack servers with the disk array having 6TB to 8TB of disk capacity. In an entry configuration, it costs $180,000, or about $3,600 per VM.

    The larger Vblock System 200 machine is the same basic design, but comes in a standard 42U rack and has from four to 12 servers and anywhere from 14 to 105 disk drives in its EMC VNX disk arrays and uses Cisco’s Nexus 5548 converged switches to manage both storage and server traffic (using Fibre Channel over Ethernet). The base Vblock System 200 costs $350,000 and has a beefier version of the Nexus 1000V virtual switch. It is not clear what the disk configuration or scalability limits are for the Vblock System 200, but it probably can handle 200 to 300 VMs and tens of terabytes of disk capacity.

    The interesting bit, as far as I am concerned, is that these entry converged systems are based on racks servers and rack switches, not on the “California” Unified Computing System chassis, which is a modular and integrated design that IBM has emulated with its own PureFlex systems and Flex server nodes. I guess small shops can’t afford the premium that Cisco and EMC want to charge for the real UCS iron. This may leave an opportunity for IBM to pitch a baby PureSystems machine that mixes Power and X86 server nodes in a single chassis, as I have been suggesting that Big Blue offer for the past year–ahead of the “Project Troy” machines that launched as PureSystems, in fact.

    RELATED STORIES

    PureSystems Sales Break Through The 1,000 Customer Barrier

    IBM Beats Out Cisco For Modular Server Deal

    A Closer Look At The Flex System Iron

    IBM Launches Hybrid, Flexible Systems Into The Data Center

    IBM Rolls Out iTunes-Like Store For Enterprise Apps

    Some Thoughts About IBM’s Next Generation Platform

    IBM’s Next Generation Platform Prepped For Launch

    Flex Platform: An IBM System That Goes With The Tech Flow

    Big Blue’s Software Gurus Rethink Systems

    Cisco’s California Dream: One Vendor to Supply It All

    The Data Center Is the Computer



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    Maxava

    Migrating to a new IBM Power System?

    Whether it be Power8, Power9 or Power10 – Maxava has you covered

    Our migration service moves data from the old to the new server without disruption while the business continues to operate without impacting performance. Our service avoids long periods of downtime and means businesses can reduce the risk of moving to new hardware.

    To learn more about Maxava’s migration service, call us on 888 400 1541 or VISIT maxava.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Getting Short-Term Maintenance For Your Power i Machine Entry Power7+ Servers: Those 720+ and 740+ Boxes Are Gonna Cost Ya

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 23, Number 8 -- February 25, 2013
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Help/Systems
ProData Computer Services
ASNA
United Computer Group, Inc.
RJS Software Systems

Table of Contents

  • Big Blue Jacks Software Maintenance Prices For IBM i
  • Mobility Is The Motivator For Green-Screen Migrations
  • IBM Locks Down Licensed Internal Code On Power, Mainframe Systems
  • As I See It: The Man Who Would Be Kim
  • IBM Dives Head First Into Mobile
  • Cisco And EMC Chase Midrange Customers With Smaller Converged Systems
  • Sony Ditches Power For PlayStation 4, And This Matters To IBM i
  • Incentives For IBM’s Missouri Facility Scrutinized
  • IBM Tech Conferences Feature Power, Hot Technologies
  • Manta Offers Free Student Reference Guides To Students

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • IBM Mulls Using DataMigrator as Cloud Warehouse Pipeline
  • PowerTech AV Automatically Detects Ransomware Activity
  • Infor Puts CM3 Project On Hold
  • Four Hundred Monitor, June 29
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 24, Number 26
  • Guild Mortgage Takes The 20-Year Option For Modernization
  • IBM i Licensing, Part 3: Can The Hardware Bundle Be Cheaper Than A Smartphone?
  • Guru: The Finer Points of Exit Points
  • Big Blue Tweaks IBM i Pricing Ahead Of Subscription Model
  • We Still Want IBM i On The Impending Power E1050

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2022 IT Jungle

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.