• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Reader Feedback On Oracle Takes On IBM Power With New Sparc T5 Systems

    April 8, 2013 Hey, TPM

    I won’t say “Is this a joke?” although it is very tempting.

    I enjoy reading your articles, even though I had only a light period with managing any OS/400 (V4R2 days). My focus is AIX and Unix, since 1979 actually.

    When you test these systems look closely at the specs for transfer between chips and cores. My experience with AIX and Power is that customers do not like doing the planning required to get the most out of the box. NUMA is “boring,” and planning your workloads to work with it is a headache for some; not doing the planning can be a nightmare.

    Question: Has Oracle published its benchmarks? I have not been looking hard, but I did not see any reference to any in your article either.

    Something else I am curious about: If Oracle makes special processing hooks for Oracle, are they not required to publish the specs or run the risk of Europe and/or USA agencies starting an antitrust action? (Not my area, but it is a question that crossed my mind.)

    The T5, based on what I am told, does not worry me technically–so I appreciate your more “neutral” presentation. I expect them to have lots of surprises when customers try to get all they can out of it. Paraphrase: “16 DIMMs, one for each core–for balance!” When I read that I thought–many sleepless nights and terrible dreams. Glad it is not my box.

    –Leo

    It will be interesting to see what will happen as both IBM and Oracle tune up their software to take advantage of specific features in their hardware. I am not sure what the legality is regarding providing access to the specs of those hardware-specific features for accelerating software, such as databases, but it seems to me that you are absolutely allowed to innovate and make software run better. The issue becomes one of when one vendor wants to have access to those features.

    I can’t imagine IBM making a big fuss and wanting to use database acceleration features for DB2 when it runs on Sparc-based systems. But DB2 8.2, 9.1, 9.5, 9.7, and 10.1 are supported on Solaris 10 and 11 operating systems running on Sparc T series and Sparc Enterprise M servers, so technically it is possible that IBM may want to do this.

    I think it is far more likely that Oracle and IBM will square off with their respective hardware and software stacks and increasingly tune their software to run with their specific hardware. The trouble is that no matter how well IBM has done to improve DB2’s market share among the Unix faithful, Oracle still is the dominant supplier of database software on Unix systems, and that means IBM needs for whatever optimizations Oracle cooks up for Sparc to translate over to Power iron. IBM cannot give Oracle a big performance lead on Sparc iron over Power iron, or it will start losing Oracle database customers who will shift back to Sun hardware.

    The question really, then, as far as I can see is: What can IBM do to give DB2 a big performance edge while keeping parity with Oracle on its own database? IBM can add lots of things to DB2 to speed it up, as it demonstrated with the BLU Acceleration feature for DB2 10.5 that IBM previewed last week. BLU Acceleration is analogous to the hybrid columnar data store that Oracle cooked up for its Exadata storage servers, and is only available for reporting and analytics workloads, but should make its way into transaction processing systems at some point. Oracle can’t just give up on Power Systems iron, either, although as Oracle’s behavior with Itanium systems from Hewlett-Packard show, if Oracle thinks it can gain an edge by removing support of a platform, it is perfectly willing to undermine that platform for a longer term gain. There is no question, two years after saying it would stop developing software for Itanium that the Sparc platform is perceived as having a more viable future than the Itanium platform. Neither product is selling at anywhere near the volumes of IBM’s Power Systems, of course.

    –TPM

    RELATED STORIES

    Oracle Takes On IBM Power With New Sparc T5 Systems

    Oracle Revamps Its Database Appliance Server For Midrange Shops

    PureApplication Systems Get Power7+, But Not IBM i

    Big Blue Pits PureData Appliance Against Ellison’s Exadata

    JDE Throwdown: IBM i Versus Oracle Stacks

    Oracle Has Built A Modern, Cloudy AS/400

    Oracle Takes The Midrange Fight To IBM

    Oracle Tries To Woo Midrange Shops With Database Appliance

    IBM’s DB2 Pure Scale–Not Quite iDatabase V1

    Oracle-Sun Exadata V2, Meet iDatabase V1

    HP and Oracle Launch Database Machine, and So Can IBM with i



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    Maxava

    Migrating to a new IBM Power System?

    Whether it be Power8, Power9 or Power10 – Maxava has you covered

    Our migration service moves data from the old to the new server without disruption while the business continues to operate without impacting performance. Our service avoids long periods of downtime and means businesses can reduce the risk of moving to new hardware.

    To learn more about Maxava’s migration service, call us on 888 400 1541 or VISIT maxava.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    CM First Uses Hometown COMMON as Launch Pad for IBM i Tools BCD Tackles Mobile App Development with WebSmart Mobile

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 23, Number 14 -- April 8, 2013
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Infinite Corporation
ASNA
Profound Logic Software
HiT Software
RJS Software Systems

Table of Contents

  • Midrange Power7+ Servers: The IBM Sales Pitch
  • IBM i Looks For ‘Social Security’ On Silver Anniversary
  • IBM Lets MSPs Have Utility-Priced IBM i 6.1 For Clouds
  • As I See It: Rigging Reputation
  • The 21 IBM Fellows Who Helped Build The IBM i Server
  • Reader Feedback On Oracle Takes On IBM Power With New Sparc T5 Systems
  • The Spirit Of John Earl Lives On In Scholarship
  • IBM Extends Power Systems Trade-In Deal In Europe
  • Abacus Running On Clouds At COMMON, Gives Free Trial
  • Maxava Versus Vision Solutions Trial Date Delayed Again

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • IBM Mulls Using DataMigrator as Cloud Warehouse Pipeline
  • PowerTech AV Automatically Detects Ransomware Activity
  • Infor Puts CM3 Project On Hold
  • Four Hundred Monitor, June 29
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 24, Number 26
  • Guild Mortgage Takes The 20-Year Option For Modernization
  • IBM i Licensing, Part 3: Can The Hardware Bundle Be Cheaper Than A Smartphone?
  • Guru: The Finer Points of Exit Points
  • Big Blue Tweaks IBM i Pricing Ahead Of Subscription Model
  • We Still Want IBM i On The Impending Power E1050

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2022 IT Jungle

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.