Jinfonet Adds Geo Analysis to Reporting Software

June 3, 2014 Alex Woodie

Users who are interested in working with their data from a geographic standpoint will find the new version of Jinfonet Software‘s JReport to their liking.

JReport version 13 introduces a new Geo Analysis component that allows users to work with and visualize their data in a geographic manner. Users can scroll up and down in the maps and see how their data stacks up by different geographic region, including cities, counties, states, and regions.

JReport 13 brings the new Geo Analysis capabilities.

Jinfonet says the new Geo Analysis feature, which works with maps from OpenStreetMap and Google Maps, extends traditional data analysis on static maps and provides a more dynamic method of interacting with geographic data. Users can customize how their geographic visualizations appear by adjusting the shape, size, and color of properties and labels in the map.

JReport 13 also brings heat maps and scrollable real time charts to the HTML5 interface. The product also gives users new layout options that allow them to scale charts by height and width. Jinfonet says product performance gains resulted from tweaking its data fetching and in-memory cube technology.

JReport is a lightweight suite of business intelligence tools that is often embedded into other Web applications. The software–which not only can pull data from DB2 for i but run on the IBM i server itself–includes a drag-and-drop report designer, a report distribution and management tool, an ad-hoc reporting and multi-dimensional module, a dashboard module, and mobile interfaces.

JReport 11 Brings New Dashboard, Mobile Options

Jinfonet Adds Interactive Elements to Reporting Tool

Jinfonet Boosts Performance of Reporting Tool

Jinfonet Launches JReport 8

                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot

Tags:

Do the Math When Looking at IBM i Hosting for Cost Savings

COVID-19 has accelerated certain business trends that were already gaining strength prior to the start of the pandemic. E-commerce, telehealth, and video conferencing are some of the most obvious examples. One example that may not be as obvious to the general public but has a profound impact on business is the shift in strategy of IBM i infrastructure from traditional, on-premises environments to some form of remote configuration. These remote configurations and all of their variations are broadly referred to in the community as IBM i hosting.

“Hosting” in this context can mean different things to different people, and in general, hosting refers to one of two scenarios. In the first scenario, hosting can refer to a client owned machine that is housed in a co-location facility (commonly called a co-lo for short) where the data center provides traditional system administrator services, relieving the client of administrative and operational responsibilities. In the second scenario, hosting can refer to an MSP owned machine in which partition resources are provided to the client in an on-demand capacity. This scenario allows the client to completely outsource all aspects of Power Systems hardware and the IBM i operating system and database.

The scenario that is best for each business depends on a number of factors and is largely up for debate. In most cases, pursuing hosting purely as a cost saving strategy is a dead end. Furthermore, when you consider all of the costs associated with maintaining and IBM i environment, it is typically not a cost-effective option for the small to midsize market. The most cost-effective approach for these organizations is often a combination of a client owned and maintained system (either on-prem or in a co-lo) with cloud backup and disaster-recovery-as-a-service. Only in some cases of larger enterprise companies can a hosting strategy start to become a potentially cost-effective option.

However, cost savings is just one part of the story. As IBM i expertise becomes scarce and IT resources run tight, the only option for some firms may be to pursue hosting in some capacity. Whatever the driving force for pursing hosting may be, the key point is that it is not just simply an option for running your workload in a different location. There are many details to consider and it is to the best interest of the client to work with an experienced MSP in weighing the benefits and drawbacks of each option. As COVID-19 rolls on, time will tell if IBM i hosting strategies will follow the other strong business trends of the pandemic.

When we say do the math in the title above, it literally means that you need to do the math for your particular scenario. It is not about us doing the math for you, making a case for either staying on premises or for moving to the cloud. There is not one answer, but just different levels of cost to be reckoned which yield different answers. Most IBM i shops have fairly static workloads, at least measured against the larger mix of stuff on the public clouds of the world. How do you measure the value of controlling your own IT fate? That will only be fully recognized at the moment when it is sorely missed the most.

CONTINUE READING ARTICLE

Please visit ucgtechnologies.com/IBM-POWER9-systems for more information.

800.211.8798 | info@ucgtechnologies.com

Article featured in IT Jungle on April 5, 2021