• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • IBM Clarifies Power8 Chippery And Performance

    September 8, 2014 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    A few weeks back, The Four Hundred gave you some details about the performance of Power8 systems and how they were doing a little bit better than IBM had expected on a series of benchmark tests compared to the prior generation of Power7+ machinery. In that story I also discussed the two versions of the Power8 chip and IBM wants to clarify some of the specifics of the Power8 chips and the benchmark results.

    Here’s the background. Systems performance engineer Alex Mericas, who works in IBM’s Systems and Technology Group, gave a presentation at the Hot Chips 26 conference in early August talking about the Power8 processor. In the story Power8 Packs More Punch Than Expected, which was based on his presentation, I suggested that the dual-chip module versions of the Power8 chip, which are used in what are called the Power8 Scale-Out systems by IBM and which were announced in April, were actually cut from a single Power8 die. It is not completely illogical to think this, considering that the Power8 Scale-Up chip, as IBM is calling the one it showed off a year earlier at Hot Chips 25 and which will be used in larger enterprise-class systems, has a maximum of 12 cores and each half of the dual-chip module, or DCM in the IBM lingo, has a maximum of six cores.

    “We actually have two different chips,” explains Mericas. “What we did is we actually cut the design by roughly 60 percent. But they are actually two whole completely different chips in the Scale-Out systems versus the Scale-Up. We are not making one chip and then sorting them to see which ones to chop up.”

    Both sets of chips are implemented using IBM’s 22 nanometer processes and fabbed at its chip plant in East Fishkill, New York.

    Mericas is not involved in the chip manufacturing part of IBM Microelectronics, so he could not answer my speculation that the odds are higher getting yields on a smaller die size than on a larger one, which seems logical to me. This could be a benefit of having a smaller six-core variant of the Power8 chip, but it is not the reason to create one in the first place.

    “For the Scale-Out systems, the main thing we were worried about was having enough I/O for the system,” Mericas explains. “The original Scale-Up chip would only have 32 lanes of PCI-Express per socket. And particularly since we are trying to push our CAPI interface, we would end up eating up a good bit of our I/O and potentially not leave enough I/O for what these small systems really need. And with this two chip design, we were able to optimize this Scale-Out system around having more I/O capability.”

    The Power8 Scale-Up chip has all of the cores on the same die, plus a memory capacity of up to 1 TB per socket and very high memory bandwidth to go with it. The Power8 Scale-Up also sports 32 PCI-Express 3.0 links, with 16 lanes being configurable as Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface (CAPI) ports to hook into accelerator co-processors based on GPUs, DSPs, or FPGAs on a PCI card and link them into the virtual memory of the Power8 complex. The Power8 Scale-Out chip is a little wider on the I/O, and has 48 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes per socket, with up to 32 of them being configurable as CAPI ports. So if you want to run an accelerator in a fat x16 slot, you can put two accelerators into a Power8 Scale-Out machine compared to one for the Scale-Up variant, and in either case you have another 16 lanes of PCI-Express 3.0 per socket to hook other peripherals like disk controllers or network interface cards into the system.

    The decision to make two Power8 chips was done in a very early design stage, well before first silicon, and had been part of the Power8 strategy for quite some time ahead of the launch in April, Mericas said.

    Some other things to note. In the table presenting the relative performance of Power7+ and Power8 systems, the table showed the relative performance of the Power8 Scale-Out data shown at Hot Chips 25 with the Power8 Scale-Up data run on the new machines launched in April. These were not normalized to a specific cloud frequency, which was not clear in the data shown. Rather, IBM ran it on the fastest 16-core Power 740+ system and on the fastest 24-core Power8 S824 system and showed the relative performance. The commercial workload that is probably most relevant to IBM i shops was a mathematical average of a bunch of different benchmarks; Mericas did not divulge which ones.

    I just noticed something else interesting in the presentation from Hot Chips 26 that I missed a few weeks ago, and that is the big improvement in hardware encryption with the Power8 chips:

    The Power8 core and chip has accelerators for AES encryption and SHA hashing algorithms in on the chip and in the core, and the RAID CRC/syndrome checksum accelerator that is new with Power8 is in the core as well. The interesting bit in that chart above is that Power8 has user-mode instructions to accelerate common algorithms, and on the SPECjbb2013 Java application benchmark the tweaks to the hardware encryption lead to a 10 percent improvement in performance. Also, look at how few cycles per byte the SHA and AES functions take on Power8 as implemented in hardware compared to doing these algorithms in software on Power7 and Power7+ processors. This is a radical improvement.

    RELATED STORIES

    Partners Need To Get Certified–For Power8 And IBM i

    Power8 Packs More Punch Than Expected

    IBM Readies More Power8 Iron For Launch

    Counting The Cost Of Power8 Systems

    Four-Core Power8 Box For Entry IBM i Shops Ships Early

    Thanks For The Cheaper, Faster Memories

    Threading The Needle Of Power8 Performance

    Lining Up Power7+ Versus Power8 Machines With IBM i

    IBM i Shops Pay The Power8 Hardware Premium

    As The World Turns: Investments In IBM i

    Doing The Two-Step To Get To Power8

    What’s New in IBM i 7.2–At a Glance

    IBM i 7.2 Available May 2

    IBM i Runs On Two Of Five New Power8 Machines

    IBM i TR8, Database Driven

    Big Blue Launches IBM i 7.1 TR8 As 7.2 Looms

    Big Blue Talks About IBM i And PureSystems

    Power8 Launch Rumored To Start At The Low End

    Rumors Say Power8 Systems Debut Sooner Rather Than Later

    Power Systems Coming To The SoftLayer Cloud

    Intel’s Xeon E7 Brings The Fight To IBM’s Power8

    IBM Pushes Performance Up, Energy Down With Power8

    IBM Licenses Power8 Chips To Chinese Startup

    What The System x Selloff Means To IBM i Shops

    Power Systems Sales Power Down In The Fourth Quarter

    New Year’s High Def, Most Def

    All Your IBM i Base Are Belong To Us

    IBM i Installed Base Dominated By Vintage Iron

    Big Blue Gives A Solid Installed Base Number For IBM i

    Reader Feedback On Big Blue Gives A Solid Installed Base Number

    Power8 Offers Big Blue And IBM i A Clean Slate

    Power8 And The Potential Oomph In Midrange And Big Boxes

    IBM Aims NextScale Hyperscale Boxes At Clouds–And Possibly Power8

    Power8 Processor Packs A Twelve-Core Punch–And Then Some

    IBM To Divulge Power8 Processor Secrets At Hot Chips

    IBM Forms OpenPower Consortium, Breathes New Life Into Power



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    Krengeltech

    When it comes to consuming web APIs on your IBM i, your options often boil down to one of two things:

    First, you end up having to rely on a variety of open source and non-RPG solutions. This adds developer complexity, taking away time that could have been better spent invested in other projects. Of course, open source software is free, but generally comes at the cost of no professional support, which adds an element of risk in your production environment. RXS is completely professionally supported, and is complemented by a staff of trained IBM i developers who can address your nuanced development challenges, head on.

    Second, if you choose not to pursue an open-source solution, you’re often left having to shake up your current program architecture with proprietary software, external dependencies, and partial RPG implementations – many of which are sub-par compared to RPG-XML Suite’s wide range of features. RXS aims to simplify the efforts of developers with tools like code generators, useful commands, and subprocedures written in 100% RPG – no Java. Because they are entirely RPG, the RXS subprocedures are easy to add to new or existing ILE programs and architecture, helping to cut your development time. RPG-XML Suite offers powerful capabilities in an accessible, easy-to-implement format.

    With RPG-XML Suite, you can accomplish a variety of complex tasks, such as:

    • Calling REST and SOAP web services from your IBM i
    • Offering APIs from your IBM i
    • Creating JSON & XML
    • Parsing JSON & XML
    • Text manipulation, Base64 encoding/decoding, CCSID handling, hashing and encryption functions, and more.

    To try RXS for yourself, we recommend a free proof of concept, which not only gives you access to all of RPG-XML Suite’s subprocedures and utilities but also includes a tailor-made software demonstration that can be used as a starting point for your future API implementations.

    For a free proof of concept, contact us at sales@krengeltech.com, or visit our website for more information.

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Automatically Detecting And Re-Enabling Disabled NetServer Profiles Database Deficiencies Not Only a Hardware Solution

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Volume 24, Number 29 -- September 8, 2014
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

Maxava
New Generation Software
Profound Logic Software
HiT Software
Shield Advanced Solutions

Table of Contents

  • Plotting Out A Power Systems Resurgence
  • Cloud Vendors Team Up To Offer Hybrid IBM i-X86 DR Service
  • IBM Clarifies Power8 Chippery And Performance
  • As I See It: I See England, I See France, I See Techie Underpants
  • Server Refresh Cycle Begins Anew
  • Reader Feedback On Coming Face To Face With An IBM i Recruit
  • Inspur Joins OpenPower To Build Power Machines
  • IT Job Creation Outpaces The U.S. Economy In August
  • Paper Or Digital Forms? Having It Both Ways
  • Open The Door, Let The Future In

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Guild Mortgage Takes The 20-Year Option For Modernization
  • IBM i Licensing, Part 3: Can The Hardware Bundle Be Cheaper Than A Smartphone?
  • Guru: The Finer Points of Exit Points
  • Big Blue Tweaks IBM i Pricing Ahead Of Subscription Model
  • We Still Want IBM i On The Impending Power E1050
  • DRV Brings More Automation to IBM i Message Monitoring
  • Managed Cloud Saves Money By Cutting System And People Overprovisioning
  • Multiple Security Vulnerabilities Patched on IBM i
  • Four Hundred Monitor, June 22
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 24, Number 25

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2022 IT Jungle

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.