• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Cisco’s UCS Mini Enters The Midrange Arena

    September 29, 2014 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Over the past five years, some remarkable changes have happened in the systems business. IBM‘s Power Systems business has dropped from around $5 billion down to around $3 billion and Cisco Systems has built a converged system business that has gone from zero to $3 billion. Cisco has gotten more than its fair share of the blade server market with green-field applications like private clouds and virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), and now it is looking both low and high to expand its business further.

    The fact that Cisco is trying to move from enterprise-class blade servers to minimalist machines aimed at hyperscale datacenter operators does not matter much to IBM i shops, except inasmuch as they might buy cloudy Windows or Linux instances or software-as-a-service (SaaS) offerings that might happen to be based on such iron. If you are curious about what X86 machines Cisco has launched for hyperscale customers, I did an in-depth story on them over at my other job at EnterpriseTech, which has all the feeds, speeds, and dollars. Suffice it to say, the Unified Computing System (UCS) M-Series modular servers have some clever engineering, and a companion super-dense storage server that can put 60 disks in a 4U rack enclosure for a maximum capacity of 360 TB is no slouch, either.

    What concerns IBM i customers, and perhaps moreso the resellers who sell Power Systems and Flex Systems who will now have Cisco as a competitor, is the UCS Mini machine that Cisco has also announced recently. The UCS Mini does a couple of things to make the existing UCS blade server enclosure (which takes up 6U of space in a rack) suitable for remote office, small office, and back office uses where midrange machines have been popular for decades.

    First, the UCS chassis is equipped with 110 volt power suitable for Asian markets and 120 volt power suitable for North American markets. Then, Cisco is swapping out the UCS 6248 fabric interconnects, which allows up to 160 nodes to be linked to the same integrated Ethernet switching in the UCS chassis, with the UCS 6324 fabric interconnect. The UCS 6248 fabric interconnect allows for four double-width or eight single-width B-Series blades to be linked to each other and the integrated switch over virtualized network interfaces. Each blade can have up to an aggregate of 80 Gb/sec of bandwidth allocated to it. The UCS Mini will also allow for up to C-Series rack servers to be hooked to the chassis over the integrated switching. At the moment, the UCS Mini only supports B200 M3 single-wide blades, with other blades based on the just-announced “Haswell” Xeon E5-2600 v3 processors from Intel on the drawing board.

    Todd Brannon, director of product marketing for Cisco’s Unified Computing System line, tells The Four Hundred that in the spring of 2015 Cisco will be able to daisy chain two UCS Mini enclosures together with some C-Series racks to expand to a total of 23 nodes. (That’s 16 in the two enclosures plus the seven rack machines.) This is arguably more than enough compute capacity for most small and midrange customers.

    The economic arguments that Cisco is making for the UCS Mini will sound familiar to OS/400 and IBM i shops, who have heard similar sales pitches over the years for both Power-based BladeCenter blade servers and Power-based Flex System machines. Brannon says that compared to similar rack configurations that midrange shops might acquire, the UCS Mini will have 80 percent fewer cables, use 34 percent lower power, cost 29 percent less in terms of initial capital expenses, and will offer a 36 percent total-cost-of-ownership advantage.

    The base UCS Mini machine comes with the chassis, four platinum-level 2,500 watt power supplies, and two UCS 6324 fabric interconnects. The system comes with two B200 M3 single-wide nodes, and Cisco has some pretty modest compute in these nodes with each one having two of Intel’s four-core Xeon E5-2609 v2 processors, which cycle at 2.5 GHz and has 10 MB of L3 cache. These “Ivy Bridge” E5-2600 v2 processors top out at 12 cores, and the new Haswell Xeon E5-2600 v3 processors can go up to 18 cores. Cisco is putting 64 GB of main memory on each of the two nodes. The UCS Mini includes licenses to Cisco’s UCS Manager in-chassis manager as well as the UCS Central uber-manager that spans multiple enclosures and racks. Add it all up, and the whole shebang lists for $19,391, not including operating systems or hypervisors, under a deal that Cisco calls the UCS Mini Entry SmartPlay Special Offer. The Value Plus SmartPlay configuration boosts the memory to 128 GB on four nodes, which are equipped with E5-2660 v2 processors that have 10 cores, 25 MB of L3 cache, and 2.2 GHz clock speeds. This setup costs $48,547.

    It would be interesting to see how the Dell VRTX and Cisco UCS Mini machines stack up against Flex Systems using Power8 processors and running IBM i, and I will therefore get to work trying to figure that out for you. Stay tuned.

    RELATED STORIES

    How Does The Flex System Stack Up Against Cisco’s UCS?

    Dell Goes After SMBs With Data Center In A Box

    IBM Rolls Out PureFlex-IBM i Bundle With Decent Discounts

    Oracle Revamps Its Database Appliance Server For Midrange Shops

    Power7 Is The End Of The Line For Power Blades

    We Need A Baby PureSystems Running IBM i

    A Closer Look At The Flex System Iron

    IBM Launches Hybrid, Flexible Systems Into The Data Center

    The Dreamy And Flashy Power 720 P05 Machine

    More On That Dreamy And Flashy Power 720 P05 Machine

    Oracle Tries To Woo Midrange Shops With Database Appliance

    Cisco’s California Dream: One Vendor to Supply It All



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags:

    Sponsored by
    Lightedge

    Your IBM Power Cloud Strategy Should Start With “Why?”

    Moving IBM i to the cloud isn’t just an infrastructure decision.

    A hardware refresh, data center exit, IBM i skills gap, disaster recovery requirement, or broader cloud initiative can each lead to a very different architecture.

    At Lightedge, we start by understanding what you’re trying to accomplish. Then we look at the workload, application dependencies, resiliency requirements, operating model, and long-term strategy to determine where that workload belongs.

    Managed IBM Power cloud? IBM Power Virtual Server? DR in the cloud? A hybrid architecture connecting IBM Power with AWS or Azure?

    There isn’t one right answer for every IBM i environment.

    Start with the business requirement. Understand the workload. Then decide where it belongs.

    Explore IBM Power cloud, managed services, and hybrid solutions from Lightedge.

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Admin Alert: What’s The Danger Zone For IBM i Disk Utilization? How IBM Stacks Up Entry Power8 Machines Against X86 Iron

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Volume 24, Number 32 -- September 29, 2014
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

ARCAD Software
Infinite Corporation
BCD
Profound Logic Software
MiNET Communications, Inc.

Table of Contents

  • Cisco’s UCS Mini Enters The Midrange Arena
  • How IBM Stacks Up Entry Power8 Machines Against X86 Iron
  • Will VIOS Pushback Drive Direct-Attached Disk Comeback?
  • Mad Dog 21/21: Two-Minute Warning
  • IBM Clarifies IBM i 6.1.1 And Support Withdrawal
  • More Reader Feedback On Power8 Processing Power And What Matters
  • IBM Deals On V3700 Arrays, Preps Dedupe For FlashSystem
  • Town Considers AS/400 Replacement
  • For The Love Of Frank
  • IBM Opens North Carolina Cloud Center

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • IBM’s Bob AI Assistant Can Now Live In Your Datacenter
  • Start Where the Data Lives: Best Practices for Taking IBM i Into AI
  • Guru: A Modernization Experiment Using IBM Bob 2.0
  • How Are IBM i Shops Using AI? Fortra and COMMON Want to Know
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 34
  • It Is Time Once Again To Take The IBM i Marketplace Survey
  • PHP’s Evolution On The IBM i Platform Continues
  • Protecting IBM i Data For The AI Revolution
  • Guru: Two More Small But Handy RPG Enhancements: LIKE(*EXT) And %LOOKUPNE
  • IBM i Integration Gives Costco Shoppers Real-Time Inventory

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle