RPG Open Access Suffering from Inaccessibility

July 25, 2011 Dan Burger

You would think that in any IT community, especially one as tight as the IBM i community, there would be few, if any, secrets. But that doesn’t do justice to IBM, where apparently it is believed that loose lips sink ships. A good example is RPG Open Access. Funny how you could have something called Open Access and yet hardly anyone talks about it except the proponents of modern RPG.

Here’s a tool, officially referred to as Rational Open Access: RPG Edition, that had RPG developers overflowing sessions at the COMMON 2010 Conference. It was one of the first things off the lips of IBM i executives when they discussed the availability of the latest version of the operating system, which at that time was i 7.1.

For those who have never heard of RPG OA or are barely aware of its existence, its primary benefit is in allowing RPG opcodes, which have limited interfacing capabilities–DB2 database tables and 5250 display files are two examples–to interface with devices and resources RPG was not designed to support using its I/O model. Web browsers, mobile devices, Web services, XML files, external databases, and spreadsheets are some of the examples. This was something modern for RPG development. It showed IBM was investing in the language and in the platform.

Now what do you hear about it? Almost nothing from IBM. For a corporation that markets the heck out of “Smarter Planet,” how can they be so dumb?

I have a two-word answer for that: Rational Software. It seems like the executives there have a vendetta against the IBM i platform. Maybe it’s because IBM i users don’t buy enough Rational software. And because RPG Open Access is being used by IBM i ISVs to enhance their software, Rational might sell even less software to this market in the future. So Rational gets irrational and buries Rational Open Access: RPG Edition in the back yard.

What prevented IBM from incorporating Open Access into the IBM i operating system? Who vetoed that idea or was that idea even considered? I’d like to hear the rationale for making this an IBM software product. Could it be the profits from a $500 sale? That’s the price for ROA on a small Power Systems box. Even when ROA gets licensed for a big box, the price only tops out at $5,000. The profits in this wouldn’t even cover the cost of cleaning the executive washrooms at Rational.

Someone made the decision to make ROA so difficult to order that those who wanted it got lost in the woods and wandered around lost for weeks at a time.

That was such a misadventure that Profound Logic, one of the ISVs that has products on the market based on Open Access RPG, became an IBM reseller so that ROA buyers no longer have to put up with IBM’s inadequacies. Alex Roytman, president and CEO at Profound, would rather not be a reseller of ROA. He’d prefer that functionality be part of the IBM i operating system. He’s not alone.

Jon Paris, one of the top RPG trainers and educators, is frustrated with the way RPG Open Access has been mismanaged. Because it’s not part of the OS, a barrier to its use has been created. “A senior programmer who, in his play time, might explore what could be done with RPG OA cannot do so without asking his management to order the product,” he points out.

It has been rumored for months that a downloadable free trial of Rational Open Access: RPG Edition is forthcoming. Aaron Bartell, another well-known RPG expert and vocal supporter-vocal critic of ROA: RPG, posted a blog on July 7 that the Rational tools for Power Systems product manager, William Smith, told him that “trial licenses for Open Access for RPG (OAR) will be available in ‘just a few weeks.'”

It won’t help if the trial license period is a brief period like 30 days, Paris says with some suspicion that Rational would put that kind of limit on it. “It has to be usable in people’s spare time,” is his recommendation. “An unlimited trial with limited users would work, but I don’t see them doing it.”

It’s bewildering that Rational Developer for Power Systems (RDP), which is, at minimum, an $800 product has a 60-day trial offer, but those interested in Open Access are still waiting for something comparable.

In the end, Paris says, RPG OA belongs in the OS.

Bartell agrees it should not be a standalone product and has indicated that barriers to its use would be eliminated, or at least diminished, if it was part of a compiler purchase.

The amount of time that’s passed since Rational Open Access: RPG Edition has become available–more than a year–and the lack of going-to-market skill seems like it should be an embarrassment to IBM. I have not heard an ISV utter a discouraging word about the technology, but other than those interested in RPG OA for its Web application development benefits, which are currently being used by looksoftware, ASNA, and Seagull, there hasn’t been much action.

One exception is RJS Software, where Vern Hamberg has headed up a program to use RPG OA to simplifying remote database access. Hamberg, by the way, authored a paper on RPG OA titled Open Access for RPG Special Report: What It Is, How It Works, and Hands-On Experience. It was published by System iNews and is worth reading; you can read it at this link.

How much of this inaction can be attributed to bad decision making and weak follow-through is impossible to accurately gauge. However, noting these missteps leads to an obvious conclusion that it didn’t help matters and the opportunity to strike while the iron was really hot was missed. Until RPG OA becomes easy to acquire for the majority of RPG developers, its value will remain underappreciated.

IBM pats itself on the back for listening to its customers. This is one of those cases that proves otherwise. And the peculiar thing is that it wouldn’t take very much at all to get this right.

Profound to Resell RPG Open Access for IBM

RJS Adopts OAR to Simplify Remote Database Access

IBM Considers Offering Trials of RPG OA

Seagull Likes RPG Open Access for SOA

Profound Brings RPG:OA-Like Features to V5R3 and V5R4

Open Access for RPG Grabs Attention at COMMON

RPG Open Access Is No Panacea, Say BCD and LANSA

Profound Delivers First RPG Open Access ‘Handler’

RPG Open Access Spurs Development for looksoftware

                     Post this story to del.icio.us
               Post this story to Digg
    Post this story to Slashdot

Tags:

Best Practices for Doing IBM i Cloud Backup & DRaaS Right

In the technology business for 30+ years including more than a decade in cloud backup and disaster recovery, we’ve learned a few things along the way. Here are best practices to follow – and land mines to avoid.

RELIABILITY. Up to 71% of restores from tape contain failures.

BEST PRACTICE: Use disk-to-disk technology for backups.

With disk-to-disk technology, your backup data resides on disk drives, proven to be far more reliable than tapes. When your backup completes, you know the data is secure and accessible on the disk drive. With tapes you never really know if your data is usable until you try to restore it, at which point it’s too late.

BREADTH OF OFFERING. Choice in product and service offerings meet your business’ needs.

BEST PRACTICE: Don’t settle for less than what you need.

Vendor offerings vary widely. Some are designed primarily for consumers and others for enterprise data centers. Choose a solution that scales and offers the features you need to provide the level of service you expect. De-duplication and delta-block technologies will improve performance, reduce your data footprint and save you money. Find out if their de-duplication offering is at the file level or the block level. Make sure the solution can back up servers, PCs, and laptops as well your applications.

SECURITY. 60% of organizations using tapes don’t encrypt their backups.

BEST PRACTICE: End-to-end encryption with no “back door.”

Using encryption with tape makes backups run slowly and often takes too long to fit within a backup window. As a result, most people simply turn encryption off, creating a security risk. Even with the physical safety of disk-to-disk backup, encryption is essential. Look for 256-bit AES. Find a solution that encrypts your data during transmission and storage. Make certain there isn’t a “back door” that would let someone else view your data.

ACCESSIBILITY. Companies waste thousands of hours waiting on tapes.

BEST PRACTICE: Ensure that you can get your data back with minimal delay.

You should have direct access to your backups, with no time spent on physical transport (no trucks, no warehouses). Restores should take minutes, not hours or days. Set yourself up to work with your data, not wait for it. Make sure your solution provider can meet your Return-to-Operations (RTO) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) which determine how quickly you can recover your data and maintain business continuity. Inquire about onsite and offsite replication that provide both improved performance and a solid disaster recovery strategy.

CYBER SECURITY. More than 80 percent of U.S. companies have been successfully hacked, according to a Duke University/CFO Magazine Global Business Outlook Survey.

BEST PRACTICE: Regular cyber security training and phishing tests for all employees using company email are essential to your organization.

Your end-users are the weak link in your network security. Today, your employees are frequently exposed to advanced phishing attacks. Trend Micro reported that 91% of successful data breaches started with a spear-phishing attack. Be sure your vendor of choice includes cyber security training as part of their backup and DR package.

SCALABILITY. Some backup systems can’t scale readily.

BEST PRACTICE: Invest in a data protection architecture that can grow with your business.

You should be able to back up your data no matter how large it grows. Starting small? Look for an option that handles your backups automatically. Then, as you grow, gives you tools to manage complex environments. Look for “changes-only” and compression technologies to speed backups and save space. And insist on bandwidth throttling to balance traffic and ensure network availability for your other business applications. Make sure that their solution offerings rely on common technology to scale easily as your business––and data––grow.

COST-EFFECTIVENESS

BEST PRACTICE: Calculate the true total cost of tape-based back up.

A 2019 Server OS Reliability Survey found that one hour of downtime costs at least $100K for 98% of companies to over $5 million for 34% of surveyed companies. When you do the math, the dollars make sense: Go with disk-to-disk. Unlike tape, there are close to zero handling costs—no rush deliveries, loading, accessing, locating, or repeated steps. And there’s one benefit you can’t factor directly: Reputation. Reliability and security can make an incalculable difference with just one avoided breach or failure.

COMPLIANCE. Most companies have problems satisfying privacy, security, and data retention regulations.

BEST PRACTICE: Choose a data protection partner who has deep know-how about compliance, and the technology to ensure it.

Disaster Recovery. Most companies lack a comprehensive, tested plan for disasters.

BEST PRACTICE: Find a vendor that delivers a complete DR solution.

You can’t say your data protection is complete until you have a disaster recovery plan that is itself complete and tested. Your backup vendor should have both the product mix and professional services team to help you prepare for a worst-case scenario. Make sure they can help configure your backups so you rebound quickly. Best bet: A vendor who can train you to deal with disasters confidently, based on your company’s actual configuration.

EASE OF USE. Some companies don’t —or can’t—manage their backups from one place.

BEST PRACTICE: Get control and reporting you can use anywhere, with ease. Managing your backup environment should be simple, and the software you use should eliminate any guesswork that could lead to lost data. You should know at all times if your data is protected across your entire network—including remote offices—by simply looking at a dashboard. The software should be simple to configure using wizards, yet powerful enough to meet your specific needs with customizable views, job propagation, and roles-based security.

OPERATING SYSTEM AND PLATFORM SUPPORT. Most backup vendors support a limited range of OS, server types, and applications.

BEST PRACTICE: Look for broad and deep technology that supports your complete environment. Your backup solution should accommodate your environment, not vice versa.

CUSTOMER SUPPORT. Backup vendors’ product support varies widely.

BEST PRACTICE: Find a vendor whose support is passionate, maybe even slightly obsessed. Customer support should be one of your vendor’s main selling points. You shouldn’t have to wonder if they’ll be there to help when you need them most. Do they offer phone support or email only, and who exactly are you talking to when you call that 800 number? Find a vendor that will treat your data as if it were their own.

REPUTATION. Does your backup vendor have a quality reputation and the financial resources to stay in business for the long haul?

BEST PRACTICE: Find a vendor with strong financial backing and customer references. There are a lot of vendors that have come and gone. When you consider a service provider, look for one that has strong financial backing, a solid business plan and the ability to be in business as long as your data needs to be stored. Ask for customer references and case studies as their customers are the best validation you can get.

Visit VAULT400.com/proposal to receive a FREE analysis and proposal

DOWNLOAD SOLUTIONS BRIEF:
Best Practices for IBM i Cloud Backup & Recovery

DURING THIS UNPRECEDENTED TIME, DON’T WAIT FOR YOUR BUSINESS
TO SUFFER A DISASTER TO TAKE ACTION.

Serving the US, Canada, & Latin America

VAULT400 Cloud Backup & DRaaS is an IBM Server Proven Solution.

800.211.8798 | info@ucgtechnologies.com| ucgtechnologies.com/cloud

To the First Responders serving on the front-lines during the COVID-19 pandemic,
we extend our heartfelt gratitude.