• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Do These Four Things to Avoid ERP Project Failure

    May 20, 2019 Alex Woodie

    Nobody wants to be part of an ERP project failure, but the fact is that these implementations rarely go perfectly smooth. There’s a wide spectrum of things that can go wrong in these massive projects, ranging from taking a little too long and going a smidgen over budget, to serious operational issues and even outright failure. It’s also the topic that the folks at Third Stage Consulting analyzed in a recent study.

    What makes The 2019 Digital Transportation, HCM, and ERP Report different from other reports on enterprise software implementations is the data-driven approach to understanding the deployments from quantitative and qualitative points of view, said Eric Kimberling, CEO and founder of Third Stage Consulting.

    “We went to look at what’s actually happening with transformations today, what are some of the challenges companies face, what are the actual results they’re achieving, and what are the trends in the marketplace,” Kimberling said in a video that accompanied the report’s release last month.

    “We also did something different this year that we haven’t done in other studies, which was to understand the factors with the highest statistical correlation with transformation success and failure,” continued Kimberling, who left Panorama Consulting last year to found his own firm.

    “Other studies out there will look at average implementation time or cost or whatever the metric may be without any sort of analyses of what’s driving those factors, which variables had the biggest impact on time and cost and results and risk, and all that good stuff.”

    The Denver, Colorado, ERP consulting firm analyzed more than 1,000 IT projects, and came to some not-so-surprising conclusions about the average costs and implementation times for ERP, HCM, and digital transformation projects.

    For starters, midsize companies with $50 million to $1 billion in revenue typically spend the equivalent of 3 percent to 5 percent of their annual revenue on enterprise software, whereby large companies (those with more than $1 billion in revenue) typically spend about 2 percent to 3 percent.

    “Large companies . . . get greater economy of scale,” Kimberling explained. “There’s a certain amount of minimum activity and investment you need to make in any sort of transformation, whether you’re $10 million or $10 billion company.”

    Also not surprising is that enterprise software implementation times for midsize companies, at 14 to 16 months, are shorter than they are for larger companies, which take on average 31 to 34 months. That’s because implementations for larger companies are usually more complicated and touch more parts of the company.

    The report got into some unexplored territory with its focus on operational disruption – or when the enterprise software implementations really start to go off the rails.

    “We’re not talking about your typical disruption, which is people fumble around with technology a little bit, they get frustrated, the go-live doesn’t go quite as smoothly as you’d like,” Kimberling said. “Those are what I would consider pretty immaterial disruptions in the grand scheme of things.

    “What we’re talking about here,” he continued, “are material operational disruptions. We can’t ship product. We can’t close the books. We can’t run payroll. We can’t update employee information in our HCM system. A lot of operational disruptions can fall into this category.”

    According to Third Stage Consulting’s report, 51 percent to 54 percent of organizations in the study experience some type of operational disruption when the “go live” button was pressed. The disruptions ranged from about one week to several months in time, Kimberling said.

    “But the real kicker is that companies who do experience operational disruption typically end up spending an additional 50 percent to 300 percent on the total cost of that transformation,” he said. “Say you spend $10 million on your actual implementation. You get to go-live, but then you lose millions of dollars of orders or backlog that you can’t fulfill. If you add that cost to your total cost of implementation, the number can balloon pretty quickly.”

    The fact that more than half of companies experience a serious operational disruption with their ERP, HCM, or digital transformation projects is a really astounding figure, when you consider it. But what’s even more compelling is the fact that the bill for operational disruption starts at 50 percent of the cost of the implementation itself. This is another way of saying that smooth implementations of major enterprise software changes are exceedingly rare endeavors.

    Third Stage Consulting went a step further and attempted to find correlations between operational disruption and other actives and drivers of the project. It came up with these four factors:

    • Clarity of defined business processes. “Those that spent more time defining clear business processes prior to or early in their transformations were less likely to experience disruption”
    • Investment in organizational change and training. “Those that implemented more complete and effective change strategies were less likely to experience disruption.”
    • Level of executive alignment among key stakeholders and the transformation project team. “Those that rated higher in executive, stakeholder alignment, and project team alignment were less likely to experience disruption.”
    • Time and effort spent during user acceptance testing and conference room pilots. “The more thoroughly a company tested its processes and systems, the less likely they were to experience disruption.”

    “Those are four tangible things you can take to your transition and say, ‘Are we really doing enough in these areas and is there something we can do better to mitigate that risk?'” Kimberling said. “Because at the end of the day, your highest line item cost in your transformation if you don’t do everything right is going to operational disruption.”

    Executives and managers might think they’re saving money by shortcutting some of these processes, but the odds of coming out on top are against them, Kimberling said. “Chances are if you don’t do things the right first time, your costs are going to be a lot higher than if you just invested the time and money up front to do it right.

    “That’s a hard thing to convey to executives and project teams if they haven’t been through these types of transformation before,” he continued. “But fortunately, the data speaks for itself.”

    RELATED STORIES

    ERP Caught Up In Cloud Updrafts

    What IBM i Shops Should Know About Digital Transformation

    ERP Upgrades: Love ‘Em or Leave ‘Em?

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: digital transformation, ERP, HCM, IBM i

    Sponsored by
    UCG Technologies

    CYBER-ATTACKS ON THE RISE. PROTECT WITH THE TRIPLE PLAY.

    COVID-19 has not only caused a global pandemic, but has sparked a “cyber pandemic” as well.

    “Cybersecurity experts predict that in 2021, there will be a cyber-attack incident every 11 seconds. This is nearly twice what it was in 2019 (every 19 seconds), and four times the rate five years ago (every 40 seconds in 2016). It is expected that cybercrime will cost the global economy $6.1 trillion annually, making it the third-largest economy in the world, right behind those of the United States and China.”1

    Protecting an organization’s data is not a single-faceted approach, and companies need to do everything they can to both proactively prevent an attempted attack and reactively respond to a successful attack.

    UCG Technologies’ VAULT400 subscription defends IBM i and Intel systems against cyber-attacks through comprehensive protection with the Triple Play Protection – Cloud Backup, DRaaS, & Enterprise Cybersecurity Training.

    Cyber-attacks become more sophisticated every day. The dramatic rise of the remote workforce has accelerated this trend as cyber criminals aggressively target company employees with online social engineering attacks. It is crucial that employees have proper training on what NOT to click on. Cyber threats and social engineering are constantly evolving and UCG’s Enterprise Cybersecurity Training (powered by KnowBe4) is designed to educate employees on the current cutting-edge cyber-attacks and how to reduce and eliminate them.

    A company is only as strong as its weakest link and prevention is just part of the story. Organizations need to have a quick response and actionable plan to implement should their data become compromised. This is the role of cloud backup and disaster-recovery-as-a-service (DRaaS).

    Data is a company’s most valuable asset. UCG’s VAULT400 Cloud Backup provides 256-bit encrypted backups to two (2) remote locations for safe retrieval should a cyber-attack occur. This is a necessary component of any protection strategy. Whether a single click on a malicious link brings down the Windows environment or an infected SQL server feeds the IBM i, once the data is compromised, there is no going back unless you have your data readily available.

    Recovery is not a trivial task, especially when you factor in the time sensitive nature of restoring from an active attack. This leads to the third play of the Triple Play Protection – DRaaS.  Companies have myriad concerns once an attack is realized and a managed service disaster recovery allows employees to keep focus on running the business in a crisis state.

    The combination of training employees with secure backup and disaster recovery offers companies the best chance at avoiding financial disruption in an age of stronger, more frequent cyber-attacks.

    Reach out to UCG Technologies to discuss your company’s security needs and develop a data protection plan that fits you best.

    ucgtechnologies.com/triple-play

     800.211.8798 | info@ucgtechnologies.com

     

    1. https://theconversation.com/cyberattacks-are-on-the-rise-amid-work-from-home-how-to-protect-your-business-151268

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 21, Number 20 Guru: Application Tracing With The QTRC APIs

    5 thoughts on “Do These Four Things to Avoid ERP Project Failure”

    • Raj Purohit says:
      May 20, 2019 at 7:03 am

      Hi Alex Woodie,

      I think, in most of the cases, the projects involved very little change management and business process reengineering. Instead, organizations focused on finding the top ERP systems based on what their competitors were using. These organizations implemented new ERP software but did not improve business processes. Ultimately, the project failed.

      Thank You,

      Reply
    • Philip Woodman says:
      May 20, 2019 at 7:07 am

      ERP project governance ensures the project team makes decisions aligned with the project goals. Use a project charter to assign certain team members the responsibility of approving requests, such as customization requests. Executives and other employees may make requests that increase project scope and cost. If you have strong project controls, you will only approve requests that align with the organizational vision. This will reduce the risk of budget and timeline overruns. ( https://www.deskera.com/erp/ )

      Reply
    • Raj Purohit says:
      May 20, 2019 at 7:09 am

      Hi Alex Woodie,

      I think, In most cases, the projects involved very little change management and business process reengineering. Instead, organizations focused on finding the top ERP systems based on what their competitors were using. These organizations implemented new ERP software but did not improve business processes. Ultimately, the project failed.

      Reply
    • Sonia Mishra says:
      February 18, 2020 at 4:49 am

      Great Post! Alex ..learned a lot about ERP implementation process

      Reply
    • Delight says:
      June 13, 2020 at 2:12 am

      Great explanation!!!
      We have need to focus on every modules of ERP. If multiple developers are on different modules then we need to take care for code migration.

      Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 29 Issue: 32

This Issue Sponsored By

  • iTech Solutions
  • ProData Computer Services
  • ARCAD Software
  • MITEC
  • WorksRight Software

Table of Contents

  • IBM Gives A Peek Of The Future At POWERUp 2019
  • Why i Reason #87: Eschewing Performance for Its Own Sake
  • Guru: Application Tracing With The QTRC APIs
  • Do These Four Things to Avoid ERP Project Failure
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 21, Number 20

Content archive

  • The Four Hundred
  • Four Hundred Stuff
  • Four Hundred Guru

Recent Posts

  • Why Open Source Is Critical for Digital Transformation
  • mrc Refreshes IBM i Low-Code Dev Tool
  • Unit Testing Automation Hits Shift Left Instead of Ctrl-Alt-Delete Cash
  • Four Hundred Monitor, March 3
  • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 23, Number 9
  • Doing The Texas Two Step From Power9 To Power10
  • PHP’s Legacy Problem
  • Guru: For IBM i Newcomers, An Access Client Solutions Primer
  • IBM i 7.1 Extended Out To 2024 And Up To The IBM Cloud
  • Some Practical Advice On That HMC-Power9 Impedance Mismatch

Subscribe

To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Contributors
  • Four Hundred Monitor
  • IBM i PTF Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Subscribe

Search

Copyright © 2021 IT Jungle

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.