• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • That Windows-on-Power Rumor Surfaces Again

    May 27, 2008 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    I don’t know exactly how this rumor got started up again, but it did. Some people contacted me late last week and said that they heard from someone who heard from someone who attended the COMMON Europe Conference in Barcelona that ran in mid-May that IBM and Microsoft were working on a port of the Windows operating system to the Power6 processors.

    According to one telling of the rumor, Mark Shearer, the former general manager of the former System i division and now vice president of marketing and offerings for IBM’s Business Systems division, told people at COMMON Europe that Windows on Power was in the works.

    I hate to burst anyone’s bubble–and in this case, I really mean I hate to, since I have argued that IBM and Microsoft should do this and I wish that Windows had never left the Power platform–but I am going to. I contacted my sources at IBM, who asked Shearer if he had said any such thing, and he denied saying it or giving anyone the impression that Windows was being ported to Power6.

    Even if Windows Server 2008 is never ported to the Power6 or Power7 processors, I think the next best thing would be to get a native .NET runtime environment ported to the i, AIX, and Linux operating systems running on Power iron. This could be best accomplished through a licensing agreement between IBM and Microsoft, but using the open source Project Mono clone of the .NET runtime environment, which is controlled by commercial Linux distributor Novell might be the easiest way to accomplish this task. Embedding .NET into i, AIX, and Linux should be no more difficult, in theory, than making Java and its virtual machines run on Power. And that certainly works.

    If you want such capability, or think it will help the i or AIX platforms, you should lean on IBM and work through the local user groups and the larger COMMON and COMMON Europe user groups for the OS/400-i5/OS-i platform to get this functionality in as a formal requirement.

    RELATED STORIES

    Does Native .NET Support Matter for the System i?

    Reader Feedback on Native .NET for System i

    Next Up on the System i: Native .NET

    Soltis and Friends Give Their Visions for the iSeries

    Big Blue Should Do Power Windows, Too



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 21 -- May 27, 2008

    Sponsored by
    ARCAD Software

    [Webinar] Git on IBM i: A True Look at What It Takes

    Ready to bring your IBM i development into the modern DevOps era? Join Jeff Tickner, CTO North America, and Alan Ashley, Sr. Solutions Architect, for a practical look at what it really takes to migrate to Git on IBM i and how to do it right.

    What you’ll discover:

    • Modern DevOps approaches to bring teams together and boost efficiency with flexible Git options
    • Bi-directional push/pull operations and pipeline automation
    • Best practices based on years of real-world experience
    • ARCAD’s seamless and highly optimized Git integration in action

    Whether you’re evaluating Git for the first time or planning your migration strategy, this session will provide a clear, actionable path forward.

    Register Now!

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    COMMON Belgium Shifts Focus from i to IBM SMB CDW Survey Says IT Shouldn’t Wear Green on Its Sleeves

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 21

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • The Way IBM Sees New Versus Prior i Platforms
    • The Server Biz Enjoys the X64 Upgrade Cycle in Q1
    • Evans Data Ranks Integrated Development Environments
    • As I See It: The Programmer as Artist
    • Reseller Mainline to Acquire Competitor Cornerstone
    • COMMON Belgium Shifts Focus from i to IBM SMB
    • That Windows-on-Power Rumor Surfaces Again
    • CDW Survey Says IT Shouldn’t Wear Green on Its Sleeves
    • Magic Software Boosts Sales, But Profits Under Pressure in Q1
    • The IT Services Business Keeps On A-Growing

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • More Power Systems Price Hikes, This Time They Are “Directional”
    • AI Is Not Just For Developers, It Is For Everyone At Your Company
    • Guru: Finding Data In The Forest – Exploring Three-Part Naming In SQL
    • Former IBMer’s New Book Puts The Midrange In The Spotlight
    • Have You Tried To Buy A Server Lately?
    • GenAI Is The Death Of Deterministic Project Budgeting
    • PTC Adds Support For VS Code With Implementer 12.7
    • Guru: Single Threading A Program Execution
    • As I See It: Push Back
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 21

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle