• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CDW Survey Says IT Shouldn’t Wear Green on Its Sleeves

    May 27, 2008 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    IT professionals are, by nature, a pretty skeptical lot. You’d expect that, after being told so many promises about how such and such a technology was going to make their lives easier, and maybe it did and maybe it didn’t, and, to be fair, after making their own predictions about the impact of their own code or IT architecture, which may or may not have panned out for end users. And so it is during the new energy crunch and this whole “green IT” phenomenon. People sometimes over do it.

    That is not to say that large data centers are not in the middle of their own crisis over power, cooling, compute density, and scalability, because they most certainly are. But the issues that affect the largest data centers, with their mountains of consolidated IT gear, do not necessarily affect small and midrange business in the same degree.

    According to a survey of IT people done by distributor CDW, which focuses on the small and medium business market, the terms “green IT” and “sustainable IT” are not well known to the IT professionals that are its customers, even though 74 percent of these same executives are somewhat or extremely familiar with the power management and virtualization technologies that are themselves key components of green IT.

    Perhaps more importantly, while the IT pros say, in general, that green IT technologies are important to them, their bosses–the presidents and owners of the companies that they work for–are less concerned about IT-specific energy costs than they are controlling energy costs across the entire company. This stands to reason. For a lot of companies, the energy consumed by a half rack of servers in the corner of one building doesn’t stack up against other issues. (I mean, how could it?) So it comes as no surprise that among the 557 companies surveyed by CDW, only a third of the companies had initiated a green initiative (IT or otherwise) to try to reduce energy consumption within their department or across their company. And of those that do have a green initiative, a little less than a third of these companies have not yet brought the IT department into the equation. In many cases, the green initiatives that do related to IT are more about recycling displaced servers and PCs in an environmentally sound way, not worrying about virtualizing and sharing components or reducing power and cooling requirements.

    “IT decision makers, like many business executives, are very happy to accept environmental benefits from their choices,” explains Mark Gambill, vice president and chief marketing officer at CDW. “But their first requirement is that marketers help them solve operational problems and offer a solid business case. There are many paths to a greener IT operation, whether or not they are marked with green signs. This survey says that IT professionals may be applauded for being green, but they are rewarded for making good IT decisions.”

    It sure isn’t easy being green, is it, Kermit? Unless you are talking about saved dollar bills, of course. Then, out comes the envy–which is also green. When electricity costs 50 cents a kilowatt hour, we’ll see how this CDW survey pans out when the company runs it again.

    RELATED STORIES

    Microsoft Hands Out Half a Million for Green Computing

    IGEL Touts the Green Effect of Thin Clients

    Green Computing Tops Gartner’s List of 10 Hottest Technologies

    IBM Sees Green in Going Green in Data Centers

    How To Build a Green Data Center

    Uncle Sam Pushes Energy Star Ratings for Servers

    Power Company Gives Rebates on Energy-Efficient Servers

    AMD’s Green Grid Project to Educate IT on Power Issues

    The Balance of Server Powers

    Lean, Mean Green Machines



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 21 -- May 27, 2008

    Sponsored by
    Lightedge

    Your IBM Power Cloud Strategy Should Start With “Why?”

    Moving IBM i to the cloud isn’t just an infrastructure decision.

    A hardware refresh, data center exit, IBM i skills gap, disaster recovery requirement, or broader cloud initiative can each lead to a very different architecture.

    At Lightedge, we start by understanding what you’re trying to accomplish. Then we look at the workload, application dependencies, resiliency requirements, operating model, and long-term strategy to determine where that workload belongs.

    Managed IBM Power cloud? IBM Power Virtual Server? DR in the cloud? A hybrid architecture connecting IBM Power with AWS or Azure?

    There isn’t one right answer for every IBM i environment.

    Start with the business requirement. Understand the workload. Then decide where it belongs.

    Explore IBM Power cloud, managed services, and hybrid solutions from Lightedge.

    Share this:

    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    That Windows-on-Power Rumor Surfaces Again Magic Software Boosts Sales, But Profits Under Pressure in Q1

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 21

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • The Way IBM Sees New Versus Prior i Platforms
    • The Server Biz Enjoys the X64 Upgrade Cycle in Q1
    • Evans Data Ranks Integrated Development Environments
    • As I See It: The Programmer as Artist
    • Reseller Mainline to Acquire Competitor Cornerstone
    • COMMON Belgium Shifts Focus from i to IBM SMB
    • That Windows-on-Power Rumor Surfaces Again
    • CDW Survey Says IT Shouldn’t Wear Green on Its Sleeves
    • Magic Software Boosts Sales, But Profits Under Pressure in Q1
    • The IT Services Business Keeps On A-Growing

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • Will Power Chips Get A Converged Arm Instruction Set Like Z Mainframe CPUs?
    • Thinking About Moving IBM i To The Cloud? Don’t Start With The Quote
    • Precisely To Add Ransomware Protection In MIMIX 11
    • It’s D-Day For Cybersecurity, AI Firms Warn
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 30
    • Oracle Dips A Toe Into IBM’s EBCDIC World
    • When Your Small IBM i Team Is Really A Team Of One
    • Guru: Putting Failure Handling In Its Place
    • Inside The Security Enhancements In ACS
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 28, Number 28: A Crazy Number of Security Vulnerability Patches

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle