• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • As I See It: The Programmer as Artist

    May 27, 2008 Victor Rozek

    It has been variously described as art, science, a teachable skill, a creative process, and an exercise in logic. And because it can boast of having all those properties, the nature of programming remains as elusive as good government. The challenge in pinning down the essence of programming is that no single descriptor is exact or sufficient. Almost anything you can say about it elicits a “yes, but. . .” reaction.

    Yes, programming has artistic elements, but how artistic is an accounting program? Yes, IT began as Computer Science, and during the formative years programmers wore lab coats and coded in machine language, but higher level languages have made programming much less mysterious and much more accessible. Yes, programming is a teachable skill, but not everyone can learn it, and not all those who learn it do it well. Yes, it is a creative process, but not if you work for a programming factory where pre-existing modules are cobbled together to create one-size-fits-all solutions. Yes, programming is an exercise in logic, but then again, there is a lot of spaghetti code out there.

    The first time I did any coding, I remember thinking that programming was the equivalent of translating a book from one language to another. The original text being the specification for the program, the program itself becoming the translated text. But that, too, is inadequate. Without the compiler, the program is “unreadable.” So there is a second “translation” from which the code (and the programmer) profits.

    Dependence on the compiler is one of the arguments against the proposition that programming is art. If code requires an assist from the compiler–and relies on the speed of the processor, the sophistication of the graphics card, and the user friendliness of higher level languages as well–at what point exactly is the “art” actually created? And how many contributors are doing the creating? But the same could be said for photography. Photographers get a huge assist from their cameras, but the good ones are no less artistic for that.

    Besides, very few people ever see the code, and fewer still can fully appreciate it. What we see, of course, is what the end user sees. Users, however, don’t much care how elegantly a program was written or how clever the algorithms it uses are. Most software is judged not for its elegance, but for its functionality. Does it solve my problem; does it have the features I need? As a result, business applications are valued for utility, not artistry. Think of utility as the canvas, and the user interface as the painting. Business applications may make a glorious canvas, but nobody looks at a painting and says “great canvas.” If the interface is not striking enough, the program’s creator may be the only one who knows how artistic his work really is. Which is not to say that practical software must, by definition, lack aesthetics. Even utilitarian items can be artistic. Witness the Franklin stove: simple, beautiful, useful.

    But there is another genre of programs–the ones designed to entertain (like the World of Warcraft) or to create alternate realities (like Second Life). Here, the standard for judging artistry changes. Is the program challenging; is it clever and captivating; are the graphics entertaining and visually pleasing; does it excite; is it compelling enough to be addictive?

    For centuries, art was confined primarily to painting, sculpture, and architecture. By contrast, the computer revolution is very recent and one of its unintended consequences may be to expand the parameters of art to include not just the fantastic graphic images computer technology can generate–like digital representations of fractals, for example–but the thing itself, the software and the technology that produces them. Arguably, there is more artistry in an enlargement of a computer chip than in a cubist painting by Braque.

    It is interesting to speculate what artistic giants would say about software. How would Michelangelo respond to an avatar floating through an exact replica of the Sistine Chapel in Second Life? Or how would Leonardo react to a computer-aided design system that allowed him to model one of his many inventions? Or what might Dostoevsky say if he could move paragraphs at the click of a mouse? It would, I suspect, seem like alchemy–the perfect convergence of science and art.

    As for the nature of programming, it unarguably begins as a teachable skill. But a lot of people take piano lessons and not everyone becomes Paderewski. The link between skill and art is this: With mastery, a skill has the potential of becoming an art form. Amish furniture is proof.

    Science, of course, still makes essential contributions to the programmer as artist, particularly in the development of potent languages and processor technologies. And according to at least one notable scientist, the lines between art and science naturally blur with proficiency. Einstein believed that: “After a certain level of technological skill is achieved, science and art tend to coalesce in aesthetic plasticity and form. The greater scientists are artists as well.”

    Indeed, creativity remains the essence of the coding process; and logic is the glue that holds it all together. But whether software can aspire to be called art is largely a matter of context, intention, and talent. Does the programmer have free reign to create? Does he have the time to take exquisite care with his creation? Is the outcome achieved in a daring and distinctive manner? And is the code elegantly written? (Actually, “elegance,” the unofficial standard for smartly written programs that mandates simplicity and humble resource requirements, may no longer be as relevant since memory and storage are cheap and plentiful.)

    But just when you think you can glimpse the essence of programming, there’s wetware. Modeled after biological systems, specifically the central nervous system and the human brain, wetware developers are tap-dancing on the frontiers of machine consciousness. To be sure, the creation of a sentient machine is highly problematic but, if it were possible, what would we call the creation of consciousness? We have no word for it, but whether we used science or art as the standard, it would surely rank among the greatest achievement in the history of humankind.

    Distributed consciousness is another way of looking at the Internet that, according to Wired, now supports “1 billion CPUs; 8 terabytes of traffic, with two million emails per second.” What exactly is that? Science? Most assuredly. Art? Maybe, on such a grand scale that none of us can step back far enough to see the entire picture. Certainly the Internet is more than the sum of its parts. Like Star Trek’s Borg, we are becoming neurons of a digital consciousness that stretches across the globe. But during those moments when I’m able to retrieve some esoteric bit of information with a few clicks of a mouse, it seems to be more magic than science or art.

    The accelerated pace of computer-directed change suggests that emerging technologies such as the Internet and wetware are hastening a computer-assisted evolutionary process that has acquired a life and direction of its own. Already it is becoming increasingly difficult to live in modern society without a computer and a cell phone. So who or what is in charge? Arguably, software.

    Writer and philosopher Elbert Hubbard said: “Art is not a thing; it is a way.” Although he lived in a time before computers, he provided an uncanny insight into the nature of software. It has become the way we work, the way we communicate, and the way we entertain ourselves. It is the way the future is hastened and the past is preserved. What other art form could lay claim to all of that?

    In A Man without a Country, Kurt Vonnegut says this about the arts: “Practicing an art, no matter how well or badly, is a way to make your soul grow, for heaven’s sake. Sing in the shower. Dance to the radio. Tell stories. Write a poem to a friend, even a lousy poem. Do it as well as you possibly can. You will get an enormous reward. You will have created something.”

    To that list, Vonnegut could have easily added: write a program.

    RELATED STORY

    As I See It: Soothing the Savage Programmer



                         Post this story to del.icio.us
                   Post this story to Digg
        Post this story to Slashdot

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mtfh_rc, Volume 17, Number 21 -- May 27, 2008

    Sponsored by
    PERFSCAN

    Revolutionary Performance Management Software

    At Greymine, we recognize there is a void in the IT world for a dedicated performance management company and also for a performance management tool that’s modern, easy to use, and doesn’t cost an arm and a leg. That’s why we created PERFSCAN.

    PERFSCAN is designed to make your job easier. With revolutionary technology, an easy-to-read report and graphics engine, and real time monitoring, tasks that used to take days can now take minutes. This means you will know your system better and will be able to provide better service to your customers.

    OUR FEATURES

    PERFSCAN is full of robust features that don’t require you to take a three-day class in order to use the product effectively.

    Customizable Performance Reporting

    Whether you are troubleshooting a major system problem or simply creating a monthly report, PERFSCAN lets you select any combination of desired performance metrics (CPU, Disk, and Memory).

    User Defined Performance Guidelines

    No matter if you are a managed service provider managing complex systems in the cloud or a customer analyzing your on-premises solution, PERFSCAN gives you the flexibility to define all mission critical guidelines how they need to be.

    Understanding The Impact Of Change

    Tired of all the finger pointing when performance is suffering? PERFSCAN’s innovative What’s Changed and Period vs. Period analysis creates a culture of proof by correlating known environmental changes with system performance metrics.

    Comprehensive Executive Summary

    Creating performance graphs is easy. Understanding what they mean is another thing. With one mouse click, PERFSCAN includes an easy-to-understand executive summary for each core metric analyzed.

    Combined Real-Time Monitor And Performance Analysis Tool

    With PERFSCAN’s combined built in enterprise real-time monitor and historical performance analysis capability, you will always know how your mission-critical systems are performing.

    Cloud Performance Reporting Is Easy

    Managing performance for production systems in the cloud can be a black hole to many system administrators. The good news is PERFSCAN analyzes all core metrics regardless of the location. That’s why MSPs and customers love PERFSCAN.

    Detailed Job Analysis

    PERFSCAN shows detailed top job analysis for any desired period. All metrics are displayed in two ways: Traditional Report and Percentage Breakdown Pie Chart. This toggle capability instantly shows the jobs using the most system resources.

    Save Report Capability

    Your boss lost the report you gave to him on Friday. Now what do you do? With PERFSCAN’s save report capability, any report can be retrieved in a matter of seconds.

    Professional PDF Reporting With Branding

    Creating professional looking reports for your customers has never been easier with PERFSCAN. Branding for our partners and service provider customers is easy with PERFSCAN.

    Check it out at perfscan.com

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Admin Alert: Monitoring the Monitors More Power Transitions Are on the Way

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

TFH Volume: 17 Issue: 21

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • The Way IBM Sees New Versus Prior i Platforms
    • The Server Biz Enjoys the X64 Upgrade Cycle in Q1
    • Evans Data Ranks Integrated Development Environments
    • As I See It: The Programmer as Artist
    • Reseller Mainline to Acquire Competitor Cornerstone
    • COMMON Belgium Shifts Focus from i to IBM SMB
    • That Windows-on-Power Rumor Surfaces Again
    • CDW Survey Says IT Shouldn’t Wear Green on Its Sleeves
    • Magic Software Boosts Sales, But Profits Under Pressure in Q1
    • The IT Services Business Keeps On A-Growing

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • IBM i Delivers Sizable Benefits, Forrester Consulting Reports
    • SBOMs Will Come to IBM i, Eventually
    • IBM i Backup Provider Storagepipe Snapped Up By Thrive
    • Four Hundred Monitor, June 7
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 23
    • Power10 Boosts NVM-Express Flash Performance
    • Fortra Completes Postmortem Of GoAnywhere Vulnerability
    • Guru: Binding Directory Entries
    • How Does Your Infrastructure Spending Stack Up To The World?
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 25, Number 22

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2023 IT Jungle